chickenhawks

Who's Your Daddy??? Questioning vs. Reinforcing CW #2 (The Political Duality of Rep v. Dem Pt 6b)

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 18:33

In my last diary, I drew a distinction between "cultural hegemony" and "conventional wisdom", with reference to how they function in terms of Kegan's model of cognitive development:

Conventional wisdom can be thought of as the rationalization of specifc roles and relationsihps [things which define the Level 3 self], while hegemony is the rationalization of the entire level three subject of realm-the totality of all roles and relationships.  The way that one moves from Level 3 to Level 4 is not by one big jump, but by gradually becoming aware of of specific roles and relationships-at first, only in specific situations, then gradually more generally, and finally as part of a larger structure that eventually encompasses all of Level 3-at which time you have evolved to full Level 4 consciousenss.

I'm now going to turn my attention to something that has a bit of the character of both--that is, the myth of the GOP as the "Daddy Party."  I'm going to start with the more concrete, specific aspects of this, which are more in the way of conventional wisdom--that the GOP is the party of "real men," while the Democrats have nothing but "girly-men."

In one sense, this is a very broad notion, more on the order of hegemony.  But when you see it specifically invoked, enacted or represented in various concrete instances, it is much more like conventional wisdom.  Certainly, the idea that Bush--who ducked out on his National Guard service--was more of a man and more of a warrior than Kerry, who had gone to war and won a number of medals, was a very concrete piece of conventional wisdom.

Because the myth of the "Daddy Party" has this dual character, it is particularly useful to take on.  What's more, it's very much in the news lately, with heightened attention to Hillary Clinton's gender, Obama's play to black homophobia, and increased attention to the military policy, Iraq and the "war on terror."  I'm going to touch on some of these issues in future diaries, but in this diary, I want to focus specifically on the notion of "real men," and just how phony the Republicans are.

There's More... :: (15 Comments, 3064 words in story)

End Game: The War Party's Last Gasp (w/Video)

by: background n015e

Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 12:19

It's ironic Bush is recommending his staff read Bill Kristol's latest drivel, "Why Bush Will Be A Winner."  Fortunately for Bush, he doesn't read.  Otherwise he would know Kristol recently wrote this hate-filled screed:
For President Bush, loyalty is apparently a one-way street; decency is something he's for as long as he doesn't have to take any risks in its behalf; and courage--well, that's nowhere to be seen.  Many of us used to respect President Bush.
Unfortunately for Bush, lots of adults do read.  That is why old chickenhawks like Kristol lack credibility with the rest of us.  It also explains why the purveyors of perpetual war are busy grooming a new crop of spokesmen in a futile effort to continue fooling the masses. 

Like old wine in new bottles, these "fresh conservative voices" are being used to con people into swallowing the same War Party swill everyone rejected in 2006.  It's an old trick that shows how desperate they are to push a poor product. 

Here's the good news:  We just found their Achilles Heel...

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 910 words in story)





Donate to Open Left




blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
USER MENU

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search