copyright

Amazon's Orwellian actions illustrate the absurdity of American copyright law

by: Ian Welsh

Mon Jul 20, 2009 at 06:30

By now you may have heard of Amazon remotely erasing from their electronic books, the Kindle, copies of 1984 and Animal Farm. The reaction has been generally scathing, but it's a different aspect brought to light which I want to comment on. To whit, 1984 and Animal Farm were erased because the copyright holder objected. But...

While the copyright on “1984” will not expire until 2044 in the United States, it has already expired in other countries, including Canada, Australia and Russia. Web sites in those countries offer digital copies of the book free to all comers.

 George Orwell died in 1950.  Fifty-nine years ago.  In the US copyright on 1984 will note expire untill 94 years after he died.  The constitution gave Congress the right to set intellectual property laws to encourage people to create new works, but the idea that anyone would care whether or not their work is still under copyright 94 years after they died is ludicrous.

This, in fact, primarily the work of one company.  Call it the Mickey Mouse Protection Act, because the law went into effect to make sure Mickey Mouse didn't go into the public domain.

The problem with copyrights, patents and so on is that they stifle innovation and creativity.  The ability of everyone to take what has already been done and build on it is at the heart of progress, whether technological, intellectual or creative.

It is also one of the conditions for modern style capitalism and industrialization.  Knowledge must be reasonably free, everyone must be able to use it.  If it isn't, you move swiftly to a position where IP producers start extracting monopoly profits, which strangles the use of new ideas.

Americans are obsessed with intellectual property because it's one of the few things the US still has a surplus in with the rest of the world.   But strangling information also strangles innovation and growth.  The price is too high, and it is paid by America as well as America's customers.

 

Discuss :: (3 Comments)

Reform Copyright Laws to Stop Rabid Viacom

by: mildewmaximilian

Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 18:24

Viacom won a court order forcing YouTube to turn over data on every video viewed by registered users. Their goal is clearly to sue and/or intimidate users of YouTube and similar sites for viewing copyrighted material. (Before long, look for somber propaganda ads in movie theatres threatening, "If you watch a copyrighted video on YouTube, you can be sued.")

Fuck that world. Let's push back hard. We need a complete overhaul of copyright laws to bring them into line with the moral standards of our generation. My quick suggestions: Make every television clip older than 25 years free to upload, download and view in most cases. For more recent clips, I suggest a two-week window of free use around any broadcast date thereof. (How do you like your own medicine, assholes? You're going to stick actors and writers with no-pay online windows? Well we're going to do it right back to you!) Another way to go would be to allow a limited number of views or downloads for every media clip as a "community record." I could also support the revocation of corporate charters and broadcast licenses of media companies that wage war against the communities they exist to serve.

Discuss :: (2 Comments)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox