duty of criticism

Lyndon B. Johnson: We Shall Overcome

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 11:01

I want to address a fundamental misunderstanding that seems to be directed at just about everyone here at Open Left-the notion that just because we frequently critricize Obama, we therefore hate him.  This is, quite frankly, such an absurd notion on its face that I've been remise in not addressing it sooner. So let me be as clear as possible:  To criticize a politician is not necessarily to attack him.  Indeed, it is simply the most basic duty of a citizen, and a necessary precondition for the politician being criticized to reach their full potential.

Our leaders are not kings, indeed, they are not even our leaders.  They are followers of the true leaders-those who recognize injustice and refuse to accept it.

Left: Civil Rights marchers paid the price of freedom in Selma, Alabama a week before LBJ took up their cause and introduced the Voting Rights Act, using their rallying cry, "We Shall Overcome." Congressman John Lewis was among those beaten.

Officeholders, on the other hand, may not be true leaders, but they are (1) public servants and (2) official leaders.  On both counts, listening and responding to public criticism is, quite simply, an integral part of the job they've taken on.  Bad things happen when they forget this-but worse things happen when the people themselves forget this.  And that's what we seem to be in danger of, when Obama supporters start treating him like a man who can do no wrong, a man that none of us should criticize.  We rightly criticize coservatives for taking this same attitude toward palapable fools, but the atttitude itself is fust as flawed when directed toward far superior men.

And that's where Lynodon Johnson comes it.  You see, the Vietnam War was such a terrible event in our history, such a long, drawn-out, bloody crime, that it's difficult for most people to remember all the other things that Lyndon Johnson did-the things that, unlike the Vietnam War, he actually believed in.  In order to really understand how bad the Vietnam War was, morally and political for our nation, you have to appreciate how good Lyndon Johnson really was.  He was, in terms of his domestic record, the second greatest President of the 20th Century-second only to FDR.  Part of his greatness was born of his own intentions, and part of it came from his openness to others.

There's More... :: (84 Comments, 2228 words in story)






Donate to Open Left




blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
USER MENU

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search