|
Marketing works. That's why they do so much of it. It makes people think they need things that they not only do not need, and that in fact often harm them.
Marketing often manipulates people in very deep ways that many people cannot overcome. Today they're even using brain scans to learn how to take advantage the brain's wiring to manipulate people. Marketing can be so powerful that it can even convince people to kill themselves, but to hand over their money first. Think tobacco.
We have societal marketing diseases. Obeisity. The housing bubble. Global warming. Deforestation.
Modern marketing is truly a case of people on their own vs the wealthy and powerful. When a company spends $15 million on a marketing campaign that isn't $15 million divided by 300 million people in the US, that is each of us being exposed to $15 million worth of marketing.
THIS is marketing:
This is not as subtle as most marketing but it's the same thing. Pushed around by bullies? Feel bad about yourself? Want to protect your family? (Also, note that the only trouble involved in buying a Hummer is 5 seconds spent signing something: debt.)
Marketing works. Wall Street is in the business of getting people into debt. "Borrowing to make up for stagnant incomes, $4-500 a month in interest payments." Borrowing to buy a car that is heavily marketed and makes you ashamed to drive your older car that works fine? Priceless."
In July I asked here, Should We Ban Manipulative Marketing?
Here is one more reason I think we should step in and regulate marketing and advertising. Advertising is the science of getting our attention. The most effective advertising gets us to stop what we are doing and pay attention to the ad.
But have you considered the extent to which such advertising is a distraction from our lives? We have public nuisance laws that prevent people from disturbing the peace. So what about advertising? At what point does advertising rise to the level of attention-grabbing distraction that we have a right to take control and prohibit? Good advertising gets our attention - and our attention is OURs.
I think we have the right to think about the things we want to think about. A concurrent right then would be the right not to have our attention distracted -- not to have things shoved in our face.
So suppose that we require companies to get our permission to expose their advertising to us? Suppose we charged a fee for the right to promote products and services to us?
How much junk do YOU believe you need?
None? That's priceless. Literally.
|