tea baggers

Weekly Pulse: Pelosi Makes Her Move; GOP Rep. Calls for Coup

by: The Media Consortium

Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 12:08

Weekly Pulse: Pelosi Makes Her Move; GOP Rep. Calls for Coup

By Lindsay Beyerstein, Media Consortium blogger

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has laid out a strategy to pass health care reform in the next couple of days by allowing the House to vote on the details of the reconciliation package instead of the Senate bill itself. As usual, progressives are fretting that winning will make them look bad. On the other hand, conservatives are baying for blood and calling for revolution.

'Deem and pass'

Nick Baumann of Mother Jones discusses the parliamentary tactic known as "deem and pass" (D&P), which House Democrats plan to use to avoid voting for the Senate bill before the Senate fixes the bill through reconciliation. The House doesn't want to sign a blank check. If the health care bill passes the House first, there's no guarantee that the Senate will make the fixes as promised.

Originally, the hope was that the Senate could do reconciliation first. The problem is that you can't pass a bill to amend a bill that isn't law yet. That would be like putting the cart before the horse. To clear that hurdle, the House will invoke a rule that deems that Senate bill to have passed if and when the House passes the reconciliation package.  It's sort of like backdating a check. Ryan Grim explains the process in more detail on Democracy Now!

D&P does not equal treason

Progressives like Kevin Drum worry that D&P will make the Democrats look bad. Meanwhile, the Tea Party crowd is calling for Nancy Pelosi to be tried for treason, as TPM reports. The bottom line is that D&P is no big deal. Republicans used the process 36 times in 2005 and 2006; Democrats used it 49 times in 2007 and 2008. D&P is constitutional. We know because it has already been upheld by the Supreme Court. Kevin Drum writes, "If you have a life, you don't care about the subject of this post and  have never heard of it."

Teabag revolution

There is no joy in Tea Party Land, as Dave Weigel reports in the Washington Independent. The tea baggers are frantically lobbying to stop the bill, but the reality is starting to sink in. Their leaders are shifting from trying to kill the bill to planning the tantrum they're going to throw when it passes:

While many held out hope that plans to pass the Senate's version of  reform in the House would stall out, others pondered their next steps.  Some, like Rep. Steve King (R-IA), took a dark view of what might  come.

"Right now, they're civil, because they think they have a chance of  stopping this bill," said King to reporters, waving his arm at a pack of  "People's Surge" activists forming a line to enter the Cannon House  Office Building. "The reason we don't have violence in this country like  they do in dictatorships is because we have votes, and our leaders  listen to their constituents. Now we're in a situation where the leaders  are defying the people!" Later, King would expand  on those remarks and speculate on a possible anti-Washington revolt  in which Tea Parties would "fill the streets" of the capital.

Sounds like King is calling for a revolution, doesn't it? As it turns out, that's exactly what he says he wants if health care reform passes. Eric Kleefeld of TPMDC reports that King is hoping for something akin to the uprising that overthrew the Communists in Prague in 1989. "Fill this city up, fill this city, jam this place full so that they  can't get in, they can't get out and they will have to capitulate to the  will of the American people," King said in an interview with the Huffington Post.

Women and health care reform

Health care reform seems poised to pass. Amid the heady excitement, there's a sense of gloom in the reproductive rights community. Bart Stupak was defeated, but health care reform will probably end private insurance coverage for abortion.

In The American Prospect, Michelle Goldberg urges feminists to support reform anyway. She argues that the women suffer disproportionately under the status quo. If reform passes, it will insure 17 million previously uninsured women. Expanding health care coverage might help reverse rising maternal mortality rates in the United States.

A recent report by Amnesty International found that at least two women die in childbirth every day in the U.S., a much higher rate than most developed countries. The anti-choicers had the advantage because they were willing to kill health reform over abortion. The pro-choice faction did not allow itself the luxury of nihilism.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about health care by members  of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse  for a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care and immigration issues, check out The Audit, The Mulch, and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Caving on the 9/11 Trial Would Send All the Wrong Messages

by: Daphne Eviatar Human Rights 1st

Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 13:17

The Washington Post reports today that President Obama's advisors are planning to recommend that the administration reverse its decision to try the September 11 suspects in federal court and instead opt for military commissions. That's more than just disappointing, given the overwhelming consensus of military and legal experts that civilian courts are more effective for prosecuting terrorists. If the president were to heed that advice, it would also be astonishingly bad politics.
There's More... :: (0 Comments, 653 words in story)

Tea-Bagging The GOP? Scozzafava Drops Out. What's It All Mean? You Tell Me!

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Oct 31, 2009 at 16:30

Dede Scozzafava droping out of the NY-23 race caught me by surprise.  I was getting set to write a diary tomorrow about how the third-party conservative challenge of  Doug Hoffman was inspiring other Tea Bagger types, and how this dynamic might portend a fragmentation of the GOP that could cause me to re-evaluate my sense of how party dynamics might unfold, and what this might mean for progressive organizing.  The candidates mentioned so far--David Ryon in OH-15 (Mary Jo Kilroy) and Bradley Rees in VA-5 (Tom Perriello), for example--may not be very serious threats.  But things are extremely fluid right now, in case you haven't noticed.  To I was all set to talk about possibly revising my earlier views.  But then Scozzafava suspended her campaign.  And suddenly Hoffman wasn't third party anymore.  He's the new GOP candidate.  And so the big question of the moment right now is this, IMHO: does this mean an intensification of the GOP civil war, or a turning point toward a swift consolidaiton?

Either way, I'd argue, progressives should not be basing our strategy on what happens on the other side of the aisle.  But we should keep an eye out for strategic shocks and the opportunities they portend.  One thing is certain, though: Hoffman's success is a sure message for progressives in one respect, one we never should have needed: if you don't fight, you can't win.  We need to be looking at primaries all around the country in 2010. And in some places, we need to thinking about independent general election runs.  Not just for Congress, but for Senate.

Rather than pontificate at length, I'm setting my initial tentative analysis I had planned on doing aside.  I want to hear what others think in response to this development.  I have a plenty long, plenty wonky diary to come 2 hours hence.  For now, it's your turn.

Discuss :: (45 Comments)





Donate to Open Left




blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
USER MENU

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search