tort reform

Weekly Pulse: Don't Snort Bath Salts, Kids

by: The Media Consortium

Wed Jan 26, 2011 at 12:27

by Lindsay Beyerstein, Media Consortium blogger

According to Robin Marty of  Care2.org, today's young whippersnappers are snorting bath salts and plant food to get their kicks. I knew I was getting old when I had to check the media to find out  about the latest youth drug menace.

But, before you go and blow your allowance at the Body Shop  or the garden center, keep in mind that "bath salt" and "plant food"  are just euphemisms that web-based head shops use to sell these amphetamine-like drugs , according to a 2010 report by the UK Council on the Misuse of  Drugs. The active ingredients of this legal high are mephedrone and methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV).

Despite what the media would have you believe, these  designer drugs are not ingredients in common household  products. You cannot get high on actual bath salts or plant food.  Sorry. Gardeners, if you bought exotic imported "plant food" online, and  it arrived in an impossibly tiny packet, don't feed it to your plants.

Anti-choice black op linked to James O'Keefe

At least a dozen Planned Parenthood clinics across the country have recently been visited by a mysterious, self-proclaimed "sex trafficker" who was apparently part of a ruse to entrap clinic employees. Planned Parenthood reported these visits to the FBI.

In each case, the man reportedly asked to speak privately with a clinic worker, whereupon he asked for health advice regarding the underage, undocumented girls he was supposedly trying to traffic.

Jodi Jacobson reports at RH Reality Check:

[Prominent anti-choice blogger] Jill Stanek and  other anti-choice operatives, including Lila Rose of Live Action Films  are effectively claiming responsibility for sending  pseudo "sex  traffickers" into [Planned Parenthood] clinics, and also warn of "explosive evidence,"  of which they of course present.....none.  They appear to have no  credible response to exposure of their efforts to perpetrate a hoax on  Planned Parenthood.

As Jacobson points out, sex trafficking is a very real problem. And a sex trafficking hoax diverts time and resources that the authorities who could be hunting down real traffickers. She adds:

Victims of sex trafficking, after all, also need sexual health services because they are effectively being raped regularly and are more likely  to contract sexually transmitted infections and experience unintended  pregnancies. Does this help them get treatment?

Lila Rose of Live Action Films is a former associate of right wing hoaxster James O'Keefe, who orchestrated a sting operation against the social justice group ACORN. O'Keefe was sentenced last year to three years' probation for scamming his way into the offices of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) in January, 2010.

Sex, lies, and the classroom

To mark the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the National Radio Project presents a discussion of sex ed in American schools, federal funding for sex ed, and advocacy by interest groups and parents. Guests include Phyllida Burlingame of the ACLU and Gabriela Valle of California Latinas for Reproductive Justice.

Hot coffee!

Remember the woman who sued McDonald's after she spilled a hot cup of coffee in her lap? Corporate interests made Stella Liebeck into a national joke, even though she won her suit. Hot Coffee is a new documentary that tells the story behind the one-liners. Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! interviews Ms. Liebeck's daughter and son-in-law.

McDonald's corporate manuals dictated that coffee be served at 187 degrees, in flimsy styrofoam cups. A home coffee maker usually keeps the brew between 142 to 162 degrees, and most people pour their Joe into something sturdier than a styrofoam cup. If you spill that coffee on yourself, you have 25 seconds to get it off before you suffer a 3rd degree burn. Whereas if you spill 187-degree coffee on yourself, you've got between 2 and 7 seconds.

Companies are expected to produce products that are safe for their intended use. McDonald's was serving coffee to go, through drive-through windows, with cream and sugar in the bag. By implication, it should be safe to add cream and sugar to hot coffee in a car. In the pre-cup-holder era, millions of Americans were probably steadying their coffees between their legs to add cream and sugar every day. A responsible restaurant would not dispense superheated liquids in flimsy to-go cups. Indeed, McDonalds' own records showed that 700 people had been scalded this way.

In 1992, the plaintiff was a passenger in a parked car, attempting to add cream and sugar to her coffee while steadying the cup between her knees. When she opened the lid, the cup collapsed inward, dousing her with scalding coffee. The 79-year-old woman sustained 3rd degree burns over 16% of her body. She needed skin grafts to repair the damage. Initially she only sued to recoup part of the cost of the skin grafts. But the judge who heard the case was so outraged by McDonald's disregard for customer safety that he urged the jury to award punitive damages.

Another theme of Hot Coffee is how medical malpractice caps are forcing taxpayers to cover the medical costs of people who are injured by negligent health care providers.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive   reporting about health care by members of The Media Consortium.  It  is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse for  a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on  Twitter. And for the best   progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care  and  immigration issues, check out The Audit,  The Mulch,   and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of  leading independent media outlets.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Beating Back Bad Compromises

by: Mike Lux

Wed Nov 11, 2009 at 21:00

I have been pleased at the unity of progressives in working together to fight off the truly awful Stupak language in the Senate, and then in conference committee. I continue to feel very good about our chances of doing so. In the meantime, other people with bad ideas keep offering "compromises" that would do a great deal of damage to American families. One of the worst ideas is talk about using so-called "tort reform" (otherwise known as taking the rights of victims of terrible mistakes by health care providers to have a jury trial on their lawsuits) as an incentive to keep Blue Dogs on board, because "tort reform" supposedly addresses health care spending and deficits. In fact, according to the CBO, it does almost nothing to address either of these. If you want to know who is really hurt by so-called tort reform, it is all of us. Because any one of us could become one of the 98,000 Americans victimized by medical malpractice every year, by doing these kinds of tort "reforms, you lower the incentives for providers to clean up their act. Some of their heart-wrenching videos (here, here and here) will tell just a few of these stories.
Discuss :: (15 Comments)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox