Via Political Wire, it appears that McCain's vast policy experience and knowledge of international affairs is derived from wikipedia:
A Wikipedia editor notices some similarities between Sen. John McCain's speech today on the crisis in Georgia and the Wikipedia article on the country Georgia. They appear similar enough that most people would consider parts of McCain's speech to be derived directly from Wikipedia.
First instance: one of the first countries in the world to adopt Christianity as an official religion (Wikipedia)
vs.
one of the world's first nations to adopt Christianity as an official religion (McCain)
Second instance After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Georgia had a brief period of independence as a Democratic Republic (1918-1921), which was terminated by the Red Army invasion of Georgia. Georgia became part of the Soviet Union in 1922 and regained its independence in 1991. Early post-Soviet years was marked by a civil unrest and economic crisis. (Wikipedia)
vs.
After a brief period of independence following the Russian revolution, the Red Army forced Georgia to join the Soviet Union in 1922. As the Soviet Union crumbled at the end of the Cold War, Georgia regained its independence in 1991, but its early years were marked by instability, corruption, and economic crises. (McCain)
Now, I love wikipedia, and think it is a great resource. However, lifting your report on a subject directly from an encylopedia is something most people are encouraged to stop doing in, oh, about the sixth grade. If you, your policy team, and your speech writing team are still doing it when commenting on an international crisis while running for President of the United States, that's both pathetic and scary.
If McCain becomes President, we all need to make sure that wikipedia is carefully updated, since it will apparently inform our government on how to handle an international crisis. A properly updated wikipedia could end up determining the fate of the world.
I actually don't think it's such a big deal that organizations edit their own wikipedia entries, but it is kind of hilarious and instructive. The Democratic Leadership Council has of course been doing it, and you can see a partial list of their edits here.
The DLC has both supported and criticized the policies of President [[George W. Bush]].
To:
The DLC often criticized the policies of President [[George W. Bush]], but much of the criticism is seen as measured and nuanced.
Other edits include change removing comparisons of New Democrats and Grover Cleveland, and an edit of modifying Will Marshall's background from someone who has impressive right-wing credentials to someone who has been accused of having right-wing credentials.
Someone over there also has a bit of an obsession with British tennis player Tim Henman.
