Bio:
I'm a full-time organizer in San Francisco as Project Director of California VoterConnect. Married to front pager and Obama supporter Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, and working with Vote Hope and many other campaigns in CA.
I guess Obama v. Krugman/Klein is winding down now and as usual I missed it. But I have some thoughts regarding rules of engagement in the war of ideas, Krugman's political judgement and why mandates aren't the right next step. Details on the flip:
A few months ago, Washington Monthly published The New Vision, by venerable JFK speechwriter Ted Sorenson. While certainly a powerful message, I believe Mr. Sorenson's speech failed to directly address three pressing tactical issues facing the country at this point: our lack of a clear, distinct and progressive economic program, the need for a broader and more participatory politics, and how we might begin to rebuild our shattered faith in government. These issues were also addressed to varying degrees in Matt Bai's The Argument.
In the discussion following these two works, it seemed clear that the left certainly does have an Argument, but that argument just isn't sharply focused enough to work as a political force. The following post (and this accompanying slide presentation) is the speech I'd like to hear, and an explicit attempt to refine that focus.
The High Road: Principles for a 21st Century Economy
Dan Ancona
October 1st 2007
We stand here together today near a turning point in the American and global economy. Globalization, the information economy and planetary environmental degradation are forcing us to confront new and difficult challenges; planetary scale challenges unlike any that human society has faced. Like all difficulties, these new difficulties contain opportunities, and the opportunities before us are planetary-scale as well. Technology is unlocking new forms of cooperation and expanding the limits of human potential, but our democracy has not adapted to these profound changes.
