|
![]() |
![]() Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement. blog advertising is good for you blog advertising is good for you
LIBERAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE BLOGS
|
||||
|
![]() |
![]() Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement. blog advertising is good for you blog advertising is good for you
LIBERAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE BLOGS
|
||||
If we lived in a government like Israel's system, what ministries should progressives offer centrist Democrats and Blue Dogs to induce them to form a center-left rather than a center-right coalition? I've always been an advocate of holding firm on liberal economic issues and buying cooperation with compromises on non-economic issues, so I'd prefer to use ministries dealing with non-economic issues as trading chips.
I sincerely believe that progressives need to engage in horse trading to maximize political effect, but I don't feel as if there is any sense of prioritization in order to give a sense of what to hold firm on and what to compromise on to win votes for key issues. The House Progressive Caucus insisting on a public option is a start and there needs to be more of that. I would argue for holding Afghanistan-related legislation hostage, withholding things like body armor from the troops if necessary to get the point across.
Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both