I meant on a personal level
Publically, he was quite masterful, although many of his reforms ended up creating him many political enemies since he pushed them through very aggressively, and eventually, he no longer had the political capital to push any more through--especially after Washington, his patron, left office--and basically left government. Perhaps this was the only way to do what he wanted to do, but clearly, his political style was not sustainable in the long run.

He was, really, the exact opposite of today's Dems in terms of political approach. He was the consummate partisan, to the point where he was viscerally hated by his adversaries--a favor which he returned. In a way, he was much more like Bush, in terms of being hyperpartisan, but with brains, logic and even heart. And look as what he had to show for it. So while I agree that he was politically very successful in getting his many reforms through, on a personal level, he ended up destroying himself politically in the process.

We could use a few Hamilton-like Dems these days. I.e. Obama's attack dog in congress, or as cabinet secretary--for progressive reform, of course.

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


Others have rated this comment as follows:
- None at this time
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search