PS
And an even more obvious point: popular vote metric undervalues the states that choose to hold caucuses. If that was a relevant metric, the said caucus states would make a different choice.
The margins for Obama would be lower in a primary but the raw numbers would be much larger. So in that regard, Obama is also undercounted using that fallacy that PV is a relevant metric because a lot of his victories were held in caucus states.

Others have rated this comment as follows:
The Animal 4
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search