Why McCain Is Losing

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 21:30


Earlier this evening, in the commercial break between The Simpsons and Seinfeld, I saw the following John McCain advertisement on the teevee:


Considering that I live in Philadelphia and only watch about five hours of television a week, my first reaction was that the reports of McCain not running any advertisements in Philadelphia are simply wrong. My second reaction was that this ad is a perfect example of why John McCain will lose this election.

The ad, like much of McCain's messaging lately, focuses on energy independence, global warming, and standing up to other Republicans. Not to be too much of a concern troll, but there is simply no way that a Republican can win a campaign with this message. It is the exact same thing that caused Democrats to lose elections for the past two decades: McCain is admitting that the opposing party is right. Not only will this anger McCain's base, but when even the Republican nominee for President admits that Democrats are right on global warming, odds are that people will just vote for actual Democrats instead of the Republicans who are trying to act like Democrats. To quote Arianna Huffington quoting George Lakoff:

As cognitive psychologist George Lakoff told me: "Democrats moving to the middle is a double disaster that alienates the party's progressive base while simultaneously sending a message to swing voters that the other side is where the good ideas are." It unconsciously locks in the notion that the other side's positions are worth moving toward, while your side's positions are the ones to move away from.

McCain's message focus for over a week now has been on how we need progressive change on energy and global warming. Even if his policies don't match, he is at least running on a progressive, Democratic message. Not only does this imply that Democrats have the right ideas on energy, global warming and other ideas, McCain's ad explicitly says that he stood up to other Republicans on this issue. In other words, McCain is bluntly saying that Democrats are right, and Republicans are wrong.

I don't know how you win an election by making "the other guys were right along" the focus of your message. Seems to me that it will only reinforce the growing notion that Democrats were right all along, and result in more people voting for Democrats. While McCain might be claiming in low-key conference calls that he was right and Obama was wrong on Iraq, that is not the focus of his paid media, campaign appearances, or press releases at this time.

If McCain wants to win this election, he needs to convince people that Republicans are right, and Democrats are wrong, not the other way around. Now, granted, that might be an impossible task right now, so perhaps he is simply stuck between a rock and a hard place on this one. He can either run defending a message, a party and ideas that the vast majority of the country now opposes, or instead run a campaign where he says the other party was right all along. That is a pretty tough place to be in, and it is why he is losing this campaign right now.

As a final note, while Obama appears to be moving to the right in the general election, it should be noted that he paid media, which is what most voters will actually see, is generally vague and doesn't talk about standing up to his own party. Obama isn't overtly opposing his own party or base in his advertising like McCain is. His positioning toward the center seems to be directed more toward pundits, news junkies, and the highly engaged. . In other words, right now he is interested in securing favorable media coverage from The Village, and in collecting $4,600 donations from Clinton's heavy hitting fundraisers.  

Chris Bowers :: Why McCain Is Losing

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
His best option (4.00 / 3)
is to redefine the Republican brand.  He should go back to what did so well for him in 2000: "I'm from the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan.  I believe in campaign-finance reform, fiscal responsibility, free and open trade, responsible environmental policy, and a strong national defense.  I'm running for President because I want to bring the country back to the Republicans and the Republicans back to their roots.  That is truly a cause greater than myself, and I'm honored to be the standard-bearer in that fight."

Fortunately for us, the smart, savvy, inspiring McCain I remember from 2000 has given way to a smarmy, imbecilic, tired old man.  As McCain himself said, "My friends, that's not change we can believe in."

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...


It would only work (4.00 / 1)
In the presence of some other issue, like a scandal hurting Obama.  McCain may just have to play for time and keep his head above water and try and avoid becoming a Dole:  An object of ridicule.

If the polling stays with Obama leading double digits and 300+ in the EC, I could see Republicans saving their powder (and money) for a better cycle, and doing like Digby thinks they will:  Setting McCain up to take the fall and claim he lost for not being a "true scotsman conservative"


howevever... (0.00 / 0)
I agree it's a major problem, but Bush won in 2000 as being a "different kind of Republican". Doesn't that frame implicitly state that there is something wrong with the party? Sure, he didn't use that messaging in 2004, but a war time president winning by so little was really shocking.

I don't think McCain's campaign angle is so surprising---you don't have to be so smart to realize that giving tons of money to the rich is a really dumb way to help the poor, and the country has grown wise to it (losing your job, your house, and paying $4 gallon gas can do that).

The big question is, can he pull this con off? Bush certainly was able to by discussing his compassion in religious terms, but McCain doesn't have nearly the appeal with evangelicals. This is where I think Obama has the biggest advantage: he seems authentic when he talks about helping the disadvantaged. Bush was able to sell himself as someone to trust by tying his need to help with his religion, but McCain can't do that. People will look at him and see the craven power hungry short old crusty man that he is.

Beyond Iraq: A Time to Break Silence


Bush didn't attack conservative ideals directly.... (0.00 / 0)
....like McCain is.  Bush said he was a "compassionate conservative" which is mushy talk for, "I'm not as mean as Newt Gingrich, just trust me on that, K?..."  The base knew it was code, and they played along.  The independents who voted for him just got played, period.

It was also a different time.  The Republican brand was not sullied, and while some in the base had reservations about him, they were willing to vote for, "Anyone but Clinton's VP."  Since Bush's stolen election, the Republicans have become way more purity oriented, and are not willing to tolerate dissenters.  Bush also had a strong evangelical following that is absent from the McCain camp which has zero base of support.  It's a huge wonder that McCain even won the nomination.  Most Republicans hate his guts!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
the base hates McCain's guts .. (4.00 / 1)
but the money wing loves him(though not as much as Romney) .. but McCain was due .. because he paid his dues(like Dole)

[ Parent ]
I don't know how much the money wing.... (0.00 / 0)
...actually loves him.   I think they felt he was their best bet at winning the election and keeping the gravy train rolling along.  

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Isn't that what counts for the money wing the most? .. (4.00 / 1)
the one who will do their bidding .. like Commander Codpiece is now

[ Parent ]
It's a huge wonder that McCain even won the nomination. (4.00 / 1)
Yeah, a field of candidates so breathtakingly inept that this guy came out on top is something to behold indeed.

I only wish it had lasted longer, but I'll always remember the laughter...


[ Parent ]
I'll remember the collosal sigh of relief when Guliani lost (4.00 / 1)
He would have been fun to run against, but the risk of him being President was too scary...

[ Parent ]
Unless, of course (0.00 / 0)
After Obama gets past this reintroduction phase, he starts to talk like a 'reformer that stood up to both parties.'  It is going to depend on what he talks about policy wise in his general election campaign.  

Maybe McCain can form... (0.00 / 0)
...the Republican Leadership Committee or the Red Dog coalition!  That would guarantee is consecutive victories for decades!

I'm stunned that McCain would effectively copy the perennially losing strategy of the DLC.  You'd think a man of his age would know that the DLC hasn't won anything in over a decade.

This is very bizarre behavior from a Republican.  While many Republican candidates have made attempts to "moderate" themselves, none of them have spit in the face of their base like McCain has.  He's not just spitting in their face, he's taking gravel and rubbing it into their eyes!


REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


I rather Liked that Ad! (0.00 / 0)
But then, I'm a Democrat who would cut off his own hand before voting for McCain.

Not that I believed the part about "standing up to the Republican party," but a sound alternative energy policy sounds nice  . . . to LIBERALS!

I can't see those ads as effective with Republicans. Maybe they're not supposed to watch and only Democrats and independents are supposed to see them?

I can only imagine what people in Kentucky and Tennessee and Texas would make of this ad! It looks like something Nancy Pelosi would run on!

"He stood up to the President and sounded the alarm on global warming! Muhahahahahha!


I rather Liked that Ad! (0.00 / 0)
But then, I'm a Democrat who would cut off his own hand before voting for McCain.

Not that I believed the part about "standing up to the Republican party," but a sound alternative energy policy sounds nice  . . . to LIBERALS!

I can't see those ads as effective with Republicans. Maybe they're not supposed to watch and only Democrats and independents are supposed to see them?

I can only imagine what people in Kentucky and Tennessee and Texas would make of this ad! It looks like something Nancy Pelosi would run on!

"He stood up to the President and sounded the alarm on global warming! Muhahahahahha!


It worked for Lieberman (0.00 / 0)
I don't know how you win an election by making "the other guys were right along" the focus of your message.

I don't know either, but it worked for Joe Lieberman.  I guess it depends on how credible voters feel about "... and I'm one of the other guys."  Joe won by flagrantly lying about who he was and what he stood for.

It strikes me that McCain (0.00 / 0)
is running as a Nixon Republican, circa 1972.  Tough on national defense, but running away from the party on domestic issues (which Nixon never really cared about).  

I have been waiting for months for McCain to say we need "Peace with honor" in Iraq.



USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox