Democrats Sell Out Public On Healthcare.

by: NABNYC

Tue Aug 18, 2009 at 22:26


The Democrats Have Received Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars In Bribes To Make Sure They Will Not Pass A Law To Provide Americans With Health Care.

It's suddenly become popular to speculate about what on earth is going on with the Democrats. Why haven't they just written and passed a law to provide all Americans with healthcare. Something simple such as Medicare for All, for example. Anyone who wants to can buy into Medicare, with premiums presumably much lower than what private insurance charges. Also sliding scale or subsidized for low-income people. Anybody who wants private insurance is free to keep it. Why not do what is most obvious, simplest to do, and would solve the problem?

We hear silly speculation while people ignore the obvious. For example, I've heard that the Democrats "have no stomach" for confrontation with the Republicans. Someone has suggested that the Democrats are just too nice, they don't want to pass a law unless their Republican friends will support it. Another theory is that the bedrock of Obama's presidency is a desire for bipartisanship -- a belief that unless the Republicans support a policy, he won't sign the bill. I've also heard that the Democrats have "lost their way," the poor dears, have suffered a "failure of will," or simply "do not have the spine" to stand up to the Republicans. I've now begun hearing that the Republicans have "won" on this issue. Really? How is it possible that the Republicans can win anything when they've only got 21% of the country supporting them?

I actually got an e-mail yesterday from Barbara Boxer's son, who is apparently involved in politics, and is trying to raise money for some Democratic candidates who want to run for office in 2010. He had the nerve to start his e-mail solicitation by explaining to me that the Democrats currently have a razor-thin majority in Congress, a slim advantage, and we must send more money to the Democrats so they can win more seats. And then, when they've got 80%, or maybe 90% control, then maybe they'll actually do something to help the people. My response, too vulgar to be repeated here, was that I would not send one penny to any Democrats, and am seriously thinking about campaigning to throw them all out of office. It's like the rich people on Wall Street whining that their bonuses aren't as big this year. These people just don't understand how bad it is out here in the real world.

But anyway, I have no time for such speculation, nor am I inclined to participate in such nonsense.

The Democrats never intended to pass a program to provide healthcare for the citizens. It was just a slogan for them. Under Clinton, the Democrats abandoned the working people and became the party of the corporation. Corporations give them money, and the Democrats do whatever the corporations tell them to do. The Democratic Party is a criminal enterprise and we're the victims. Their motto should be "Show Me The Money."

Go ahead -- complain to somebody. It's like the cops are coming into your little corner business and shaking you down every week for money. What're you going to do? Call a cop? We're in the same position. The Democrats are involved in a criminal enterprise, looting the treasury, robbing us blind, selling their votes, betraying the constitution and their oath of office, hiring consultants at millions of dollars to prepare slick campaigns to fool us into thinking they really like us.

Have you ever known teenagers who truly believe that some teen heartthrob "likes" them. They can tell because when they saw the heartthrob, it seemed like he was looking right at them? Harmless fantasy. But our whole society is infected with it, well past the teen years, it has passed from amusing distraction to psychotic delusions. If you think that anyone in the Democratic party "really" cares about you or your life, or your credit card bills that you can't pay down, or your old refrigerator that is making such weird noises but which you cannot afford to replace, about the aching tooth that you can't get fixed, about the soft tires that may kill you on your commute, about your aching back and insomnia and grinding despair because you cannot dig out of this hole -- if you think the Democrats, or even one of them, cares at all about you or your problems, you are delusional.

The criminal enterprise works like this. First, No-Change Obama held secret (they called them "private") meetings with the big-money boys in the Medical Industry. First he met with the health insurance big-boys in a secret meeting. What was discussed? Is it possible, dare I be so cynical as to suggest that they negotiated a shake-down, a pay-off. The insurers agree to give a certain amount of money to the Democratic politicians if the politicians promise they will not even consider single-payer, Medicare for all, or anything that will cut into the profits of the insurance industry. Is that what was discussed? If not, why was the meeting secret?

Next, No-Hope Obama held secret (they called them "private") meetings with the Drug Dealers of America, who call themselves the Pharmaceutical Industry. Another shake-down and sell out. I believe there were also meetings with God -- the AMA, the representative of all the doctors in this country who think they are God because they have succeeded, through propaganda, in convincing the public that they are God, and they need to steal millions every year from every community in this country while providing routine, uninspired services to the local population, and bribing politicians to pass laws so they can't be sued for their too-frequent malpractice.

The Democrats refuse to pass any law to provide healthcare for Americans because they have taken so much money in bribes from the Medical Industry, and have been promised millions more in the future. The Democrats are corrupt. They are criminals. They are running a criminal enterprise, deceiving and selling out the public while they make themselves rich. So sad, but ultimately true.

We can't afford to buy the Democrats' loyalty because we're not as rich as the corporations. The only way we can get anything out of our government would be massive civil disobedience -- massive work shut-downs, a general strike, a confrontation between millions of our citizens and the bureaucrats who are selling us out. There is no other way.

(From the Center for Responsive Politics):

The group of people known as "Health Professionals" give more money to politicians, as a group, than all but four other categories. Health Professionals include doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, everyone providing health-care services as well as their "profesional" associations. What do they want? More Money. That's why they keep paying so much in bribes to our politicians. They want to be paid more from Medicare. They want the government to pay them more for everything they do.

They want laws passed making it impossible for any victim to sue any doctor or healthcare professional for malpractice, even if they cut off the wrong leg, even if they kill somebody, even if they were drunk at the time they provided the services. And most important of all, they want to prevent the government from setting up a program that would provide healthcare for all Americans, subject to a compensation scheme established by the government. These people paid $82 million to politicians during 2008. What did they get for their money? We're seeing the results right now: no healthcare program to help the citizens of this country.
http://www.opensecrets.org/ind...

But that's not all. The insurance industry paid $47 million to the politicians in 2008. What is it they wanted in return for that money? Well, just to start, they don't want a single-payer healthcare system which would put them out of business. They don't want a public option which would allow Americans to opt out of the private insurance field. And guess what? For $47 million, it appears that they were successful in bribing the politicians to do exactly what they want. http://www.opensecrets.org/ind...

But that's not all. This is like one of those game shows where they keep telling the winner about more and more prizes that they've won. That's not all. In addition to all the bribes paid to our politicians as described above, they also got a whole bunch of money from the Drug Dealers of America aka the pharmaceutical companies. You know. The ones that keep telling us that they're going to cure cancer, but instead we keep seeing commercials on TV with supermodels pushing drugs that will make our eyelashes thicker. They kicked in an additional $30 million in bribes to the politicians in 2008 to make sure that nobody passes a law to require discounted prices on any drugs sold to Americans. Or maybe, better put, would be to say that Congress could pass a law saying the Drug Dealers can no longer charge Americans three times, or ten times what they charge people in other countries. http://www.opensecrets.org/ind...

I hope the progressives voices in the media stop all this silly speculation about what might explain the refusal of the Democrats to do what is right, obvious, apparent, and most cost-efficient: let everyone buy into Medicare.

The reason the Democrats won't do it is because they have negotiated shake-downs with the big-boys from the medical industry, they have taken bribes and arranged for future bribes of hundreds of millions of dollars, and they don't care that Americans cannot afford healthcare and so end up living in pain and misery, suffering, and dieing young.

Why is it the Republicans keep showing up at public meetings, often brandishing weapons to suggest they will violently overthrow the government if some of us are allowed to buy into Medicare? How did this get so crazy so fast? Why aren't these people being arrested and who is encouraging Americans to bring guns out in public to terrorize their neighbors? All of this is happening because the Democrats have allowed it to happen, I suspect they even want it to happen, so they can now go back to the public in September and say "Well, we tried to pass healthcare reform, but the Republicans wouldn't let us.

I've got a better idea. Let's just have a general strike. The Democrats keep ignoring us. I don't have enough money to bribe them, but I'm sure willing to go sit down somewhere, in a road or an office or in front of a building, and see if I can get their attention that way.

http://NABNYC.blogspot.com  

NABNYC :: Democrats Sell Out Public On Healthcare.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"I don't have enough money to bribe them" (0.00 / 0)
Maybe not, but you plus, say, 30 million other Americans do, so to speak. If 30 million people invested $20/per month, each, into a sort of political Christmas Club, that $600 million per month. In two years time, that's $14.4 billion.

Considering that it costs about a billion dollars to run a presidential campaign, that still leave 14.4 billion to elect everybody else. While that may not seem quite enough, note that television advertising is partly cost-effective because Americans still do not have anything like an e-democracy. When there is an e-democracy, and it's 'tuned' to reach out to the non-politically active voters, the cost-efficiency of television advertising will go down, and compare very poorly with the cost-efficiency of a properly networked e-democracy ("properly networked" means 'outward-facing', where the networks are not necessarily internet-based).

Methinks you are making this problem too hard. I have to admit that I am arguing using a lot of theoretical constructs that are not reality, yet. Nevertheless, from an electronic infrastructure point of view, there is no doubt that an e-democracy can be built. I say that with confidence, being a programmer.

Tell me something, NABNYC, if there was a viable e-democracy in place, already, and if you plus 30 million other Americans, by chipping in $20/mo, reach those otherwise-hard-to-reach Americans for a populist candidate that reflected the will of "we the people" (thus ensuring a win), would you fork over such a "bribe"? Or would you still say "I don't have enough money to bribe them", when in fact, as part a collective, you wouldn't need to bribe anybody, but rather express your will and your voice in the form of a very modest donation?


435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


$1.00 Is Too Much; A Million Dollars Is Not Enough. (0.00 / 0)
My point is that the entire concept of "citizenship" has been reduced to "spend money, send money" to the politicians.  It's insane.  Why should I send money to John Kerry, for example, who is a multi-millionaire?  I'm not a rich person.  Why should any of us send even a penny to either of the two political parties, both of which take hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes from corporate American every year?

We need to change this system, not try to out-bid the corporations.  We need to pass a law making it illegal for our politicians to accept money, or a promise of anything of value, for anyone.  Live on their salary.  And when they leave office, for 5 years, they should be prohibited from working for any business that came before them while in office, or from earning more than a modest income.  Each campaign should be limited to a very small amount of money, a few public debates, that's it.  

I'm not giving any of them so much as a penny.  It's like a cocaine addict.  They want more more more money.  And what do they do with that money?  Hire propaganda PR firms to create campaigns based on polls:  what does the public want them to say?  That's what they say.  

As long as our politicians are allowed to sell their votes for millions of dollars paid to them and their family members, hidden away in offshore private equity and hedge funds, there is no hope for a real democracy, or for a government that will do anything for the people.  Our government belongs to the corporations, and serves only their needs.  The corporations give them money, and their allegiance goes to the guy with the checkbook.


[ Parent ]
Well, I was mostly thinking about funding DECENT candidates (0.00 / 0)
Especially non-incumbents.

I think you're making emotional arguments. Even Ralph Nader has to pay for gasoline and TV time. With money. I have a hard time taking seriously any attempt to make a radical change in our government that doesn't address the campaign finance issue. And I do mean, address it given the government is already corrupted, and will never pass significant campaign finance laws, shut down the revolving door, etc., until we get better people elected.

Good laws in that realm will come after we get decent people in. That means that their financial campaign needs have to come from "we the people", like it or not. The good news is that this is very doable. If you're unemployed, or otherwise can't affort $20/month, fine - I deliberately chose a figure that is significantly less than the amount of voters. We'll give you, personally, a pass.

But I'm not giving a pass to the American public, collectively speaking. If the American public is too stupid and/or cheap to crowdfund good candidates, and organize such that the good candidates need far less money than the corrupt incumbents do, to get the same number of votes, then they deserve what they get.

When something if hard, yes, that's a valid excuse. But when it's easy? Sorry, no excuses will cut it with me, in this case. If somebody won't run a marathon every other day in order to have a good government, then I don't blame them. I won't do it either. But if citizens have the opportunity to invest $20 and, say, 5 hours per month to get a decent government which won't rob them and their children blind, they shouldn't come crying to me.

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox