Senate reconciliation update: debate time shortened, Democrats to vote against all amendments

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Mar 24, 2010 at 11:36


Here is where the process stands in the Senate right now.

  • Democrats shorten debate time, Friday finish now possible  Senate Democrats have shortened the amount of time for debate, originally scheduled for 20 hours, to about 11.5 hours.  This could potentially allow the process to be completed on Friday, instead of on Saturday.  I have already heard from one Senate aide that Friday is in fact possible now.

    Senate Democrats did this by splitting debate time in half between the two parties, and then yielding almost all of their half of the debate time. David Waldman:

    Senate Dems have yielded back all their time on the reconciliation bill, which will cut debate time in half. Republicans still have about 8 1/2 hours remaining, so now they'll talk themselves blue for a while, and we'll start voting about 7 hours sooner than we otherwise would. I would have expected Dems to simply reserve their time and make Republicans speak all at once, and then yield back. But either way, this says to the GOP, there's nothing you can do with speeches and we have the votes, so let's let you vent and get it over with already. OK by me!

    With the Senate convening today at 9 a.m. eastern, this will bring debate time to a close around 5:30 p.m., eastern.  Votes on amendments will begin at that point.

  • Only Republicans have submitted amendments  In the extended entry, I have posted a complete list of the 33 amendments Republicans have filed, along with the various motions to commit they have filed.

  • Only Republicans have submitted amendments--no Democrats are going to offer any.  In an attempt to prevent the bill from being changed, and thus requiring another vote in the House, Democrats are pledging to vote against any and all amendments.  This means that, even if Republicans offer a public option amendment, Democrats would vote against that, too:

    "Democrats in the Senate are very unified that this is not going back to the House," Sen. Wyden (D-Ore.) told the Huffington Post on Tuesday, minutes before the Coburn amendment was introduced.

    Just how unified? If Republicans, in a bit of legislative trickery, offer an amendment to the Senate reconciliation bill that allows for the establishment of a public option for insurance coverage, Democrats -- despite longing for the proposal for more than a year -- won't even take the bait.

    "We would know it is a game," Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) told the Huffington Post. "We would vote against it. It is that simple."

    So, just in case you were unsure, there isn't going to be a public option in the new health insurance exchanges, at least as part of this legislative effort.  Democrats are not going to offer one and, even if someone broke ranks to do so, it would receive less than a handful of Democratic votes.

  • Final vote to occur after all amendments and motions to commit are cleared  Senators get to minutes to explain their amendments, and then a vote is taken.  If Republicans keep forcing roll call votes, that process will take an entire day.  However, final passage on Friday still seems quite likely.

  • Republicans now focusing on organizing around, not defeating, the bill. Since Senate Democrats have pledged to vote against any and all amendments, the Republican strategy now focuses on getting Democrats to vote against things like denying Viagra to convicting sex offenders.  The goal is to then use these votes for soundbites in attacks ads in November.  Brian Beutler:

    As the Senate gets closer to voting on a health care reconciliation bill, the Republican strategy to derail the Democrats' plans is getting creative--and dirty. Their strategy is clear: with Democrats determined to pass a clean bill, Republicans will force them to vote down politically juiced-up amendments, and likely turn them into political ads meant to characterize Dems as sympathetic to sex offenders and fraudsters.

    At this point, Republicans are just using the health reform bill as an organizing moment.  They are list-building and preparing attack ads.  However, Democrats have actually raised more money than Republicans since Sunday.

  • Unemployment Extension also in the mix  The other main business that the Senate must handle this week is as unemployment extension.

    At the beginning of the month, the Senate passed a 30-day extension. With a two-week Senate recess coming up once reconciliation is over, they need to pass a bill that extends benefits for another year.  The bill ding just that is still working its way through the sausage factory:

    A bill extending enhanced unemployment benefits for the rest of the year is backed up behind health care reconciliation and a two-week break starting after this week. "Although the Senate passed the yearlong extension, they paid for the tax extenders part of that bill with offsets the House set aside for health care," said Judy Conti, a lobbyist for the National Employment Law Project. "Sen. Reid's office has been very clear that the only way they can move it is through unanimous consent."

    If anyone objects to unanimous consent for the stopgap measure, there's no time to make it happen before the break -- and on April 5, the previous extension will expire, meaning that people on unemployment will receive letters or robocalls from their state workforce agencies informing them that they will be ineligible for additional "tiers" of benefits they've been counting on.

    If the Senate fails to get unanimous consent, this bill will not pass before the scheduled recess.  A Senate aide told me they still hope to pass the bill this week, but that requires Jim Bunning not to object again.  The plan of action if Jim Bunning denies unanimous consent, and restarts his one-man filibuster, is unclear.

That is where the process stands this morning. The Republican amendments can be found in the extended entry.
Chris Bowers :: Senate reconciliation update: debate time shortened, Democrats to vote against all amendments
Motions to Commit:
  • Crapo motion to recommit -- Report the same back to the Senate within 3 days with changes that provide that the combined effect of this Act, and the PPACA, shall not result in an increase in Federal tax liability for any taxpayer with adjusted gross income of less than $200,000 / $250,000

  • Enzi motion to recommit -- Report the same back to the Senate within 1 day with changes that strike the employer mandate that will lower wages and increase unemployment and add an offset

  • Alexander motion to recommit - Report the bill to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate with instructions to report the same back to the Senate within 1 day with changes to reduce the interest paid by student borrowers by 1.5 percentage points and to add an offset.

36 amendments filed as of 11:20AM
#3553 -- To repeal the government takeover of health care. (Vitter)

#3554 -- Prohibiting use of funds to fund the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). (Vitter)

#3556 -- To reduce the cost of providing federally funded prescription drugs by eliminating fraudulent payments and prohibiting coverage of Viagra for child molesters and rapists for drugs intended to induce abortion. (Coburn)

#3557 -- To require that each new bureaucrat added to any department or agency of the Federal Government for the purpose of implementing the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be offset by a reduction of 1 existing bureaucrat at such department or agency. (Coburn)

#3558 -- To revoke the powers given the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (Coburn)

#3559 -- To help the President keep his promise that Americans who like the health care coverage they have now can keep it. (Coburn)

#3560 -- To implement policies from the President's proposal to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid and save taxpayer dollars.

#3561 -- To ensure nondiscrimination on abortion and respect for rights of conscience. (Coburn)

#3562 -- To exempt class ! medical devices from taxation under the excise tax on medical device manufacturers. (Coburn)

#3563 -- To repeal the new $375 million program directing the very same Federal Government that has amassed a $12 trillion debt to lecture Americans about financial responsibility. (Coburn)

#3564 -- To make sure the President, Cabinet Members, all White House senior staff and Congressional Committee and Leadership staff are purchasing health insurance through the health insurance exchanges established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (Grassley)

#3565 -- To exclude devices for persons with disabilities from the medical device tax. (Inhofe)

#3566 -- To require all Members of Congress to read a bill prior to casting on a vote on the bill. (Coburn)

#3567 -- To prevent Medicare from being used for new entitlements and to use Medicare savings to save Medicare. (Gregg)

#3568 -- To protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District of Columbia to define marriage. (Bennett)

#3569 -- To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure Medicare beneficiary access to physicians, eliminate sweetheart deals for frontier States, and ensure equitable reimbursement under the Medicare program for all rural states. (Grassley)

#3570 -- To eliminate the sweetheart deals for Tennessee, Hawaii, Louisiana, Montana, Connecticut, and frontier States. (McCain)

#3571 -- To allow individuals 30 and over to enroll in the catastrophic plan if they are not eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions through the Exchange. (Collins)

#3572 -- To provide for an assessment of Medicare cost-intensive diseases and conditions. (Collins)

#3573 -- To ensure more timely access to home health services for Medicare beneficiaries under the Medicare program by allowing nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists and certified nurse midwives to order home health services. (Collins)

#3574 -- To preserve student choice in higher education loans. (LeMieux)

#3575 -- To preserve student choice in higher education loans. (LeMieux)

#3576 -- To address judicial review. (McCain)

#3577 -- To protect Medicare beneficiary access to hospital care in rural areas from recommendations by the Independent Payment Advisory Board. (Roberts)

#3578 -- To protect Medicare beneficiary access to health care from recommendations by the Independent Payment Advisory Board. (Roberts)

#3579 -- To strike the medical device tax. (Roberts)

#3580 -- To repeal the limitation on health flexible spending arrangements under cafeteria plans. (Roberts)

#3581 -- To repeal the limitation on deductions for over-the-counter medicine. (Roberts)

#3582 -- To ensure that Americans can keep the coverage they have by keeping premiums affordable. (Barrasso)

#3583 -- Ensuring that the self-employed are eligible for the transitional small business tax credit. (Snowe)

#3584 -- Preempt States from subsequently adopting their own employer mandate legislation that would target small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. (Snowe)

#3585 -- Open plans providing catastrophic coverage to all and allow premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to be allowed for that coverage. (Snowe)

#3586 -- To enroll Members of Congress in the Medicaid program. (LeMieux)

#3587 -- To strike provisions relating to payments for imaging services. (Brownback)

#3588 -- To exclude pediatric devices and devices for persons with disabilities from the medical device tax. (Inhofe)

#3589 -- To provide expansion States with a transitional reduced State share for coverage of parents under Medicaid. (Snowe)


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Foolish Democrats (0.00 / 0)
They'll be forced to vote on politically damaging amendments and they'll vote no on anything that could make the bill more popular--all to avoid a process issue that is probably going to come up anyway.  It's political malpractice

I think it's the smart thing to do (0.00 / 0)
Agree in advance to what you will support.  Negotiate internally within the caucus before things come to a vote.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

[ Parent ]
Chris, there are several more congresisonal ballot polls... (0.00 / 0)
...up at pollster.com.  They are all from this weekend and  pre-HCR vote.

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


You forgot a few (0.00 / 0)
#3590 -- To declare that the Senate stands in favor of Good Things, and is opposed to Bad Things.

#3591 -- To prevent the drowning of innocent, furry little orphaned baby bunnies in a burlap sack thrown into the Potomac River by a heartless government bureaucrat.

#3592 -- To act upon the secret plan of our friend from Arizona, Sen. McCain, to capture Osama bin Laden so that we can win the War on Terra.

Well, we can at least hope that this exercise in embarrassment will remind the Democratic members of the US House of Lords that their institution is, in fact, broken and in desperate need of a structural tear-down.


3593-- (0.00 / 0)
To prevent the President from kidnapping children from their homes to raise them in secret camps as killer soldiers.

3594-- To prevent the President from arbitrarily sending white people to concentration camps.

3595-- To prevent the Secretary form forcing women to have abortions.

3596-- To prevent the President from colluding with Terrorists.

3597--  To prevent forcing all individuals who want to get married to someone of the opposite sex of first having to try the gay lifestyle in order to be sure they aren't gay.

3598-- To prevent instant amnesty to all illegal aliens who pledge to vote democratic for the rest of their lives.

3599-- To assure that the government will not socialize all industry.

3600--  To prevent brainwashing of children in elementary school that there is no God and anyone who believes in God is an idiot.

3601-- To prevent the government from taking away all our guns.

Next fall:  Democrats want to force women to have abortions, to allow terrorists to destroy us, to force the gay lifestyle on us, to give amnesty to illegal aliens, to socialize America, to take away our guns, to brainwash our children to be atheists and to kidnap some of them to raise them as killer soldiers.  Democrats want to give powers to the President to send white people who oppose these things to concentration camps!  They voted for all of this!

(Wait a second.  Tea Partiers already believe all this.  Oh well.)

Educate, Agitate, Organize, Mobilize, Act!


[ Parent ]
Is it a bad sign that at this point (0.00 / 0)
I feel more sympathetic to the Republicans than the Democrats?

First off, they might actually offer an amendment for a PO, which is more than the Democrats can say.

Secondly, Democrats will of course vote against the PO while hiding behind the process excuse.  They'll find any reason to reject the PO.

Thirdly, the Republican strategy of offering juicy amendments and daring the Democrats to vote it down is... well I dunno if it's brilliant, but it sure is a sexy way of sticking it to the other side.  That's the kind of stuff I wish we'd do more often to them.  I really think that, for all the craziness, Republicans have done a great job as the obstructing minority, and it seems to be working.


What exactly is the argument against having to send the reconciliation sidecar back to the House? (4.00 / 1)
What, they can't get the votes?  That's what they said about the comprehensive bill too.  That's what they always say.

What, it's a pain in the ass?  Oh they're too tired... oh poor baby!  Let me hand you a tissue... Give me a break.  STFU and do your damn job.


anyone knows what happened to previous reconciliation bills after they went to the senate? (0.00 / 0)
did they pass the exact same bill that the house passed, or did they modified the bill and send it back to the house?

Usually (0.00 / 0)
The House and Senate pass different bills and resolve the differences in conference.  The conference agrees on a single compromise bill and both Houses then vote on it.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

[ Parent ]
Why can't we have that this time? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
This bill is smaller (0.00 / 0)
Reconciliation is generally used for big must-pass budget bills.  This was small enough that the Democrats could agree internally on what goes in the bill and pass the reconciliation fix without modification.

Given what Mike Lux has said, it seems like adding a public option would lose enough votes in the House to kill the bill.  Democrats holding firm on no amendments in the Senate is equivalent to Bart Stupak standing up and speaking out against the Republican "motion to recommit" and add anti-abortion language.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


[ Parent ]
As HousesofProgress asked over there, let's get some names (0.00 / 0)
If there are 7-8 votes that would flip on the public option, who are they?  If no one knows, how does anyone know there are 7-8, as opposed to 1-2 or 58-69?

I'm sick of all this anonymous shit.  Hey, I believe there are about 224-229 votes in the House for a mandate requiring all Americans to suck a donkey's cock twice a day!  I heard this from my secret anonymous White House birdie who lives in the recesses of my colon.


[ Parent ]
past reconciliation bills (0.00 / 0)
109th congress: http://www.govtrack.us/congres...

108: http://www.govtrack.us/congres...

107: http://www.govtrack.us/congres...

104: http://www.govtrack.us/congres...

103: http://www.govtrack.us/congres...

I found them by searching for reconciliation here http://www.govtrack.us/congres...
filtering by enacted, and looking for reconciliation act in the results


[ Parent ]
Tactical move for next week... (4.00 / 1)
For anything that might be remotely "good" (it's hard to tell what would fall into that category from just the titles)... reintroduce them again next week to force Republicans to vote in a situation where they might pass.

For example, I bet a lot more Democrats would be willing to sign up all of Congress for Medicare than Republicans.

They call me Clem, Clem Guttata. Come visit wild, wonderful West Virginia Blue


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox