Economic apartheid... with MAPS!

by: Paul Rosenberg

Fri Dec 17, 2010 at 09:00


Digby writes about the NYT census/google map and what it helps reveal about the Versailles elite and the rest of us:

Click on the two maps and you will see that average Americans are living very differently than the beltway celebrity millionaires and realistically are as likely to just "go out and get some of that wealth" (as Roger Simon says they should do) as they are to become an Olympic swimmer or a ballerina. Sure, it's possible, but unless you are a really, really great athlete, constructing your future around it doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

I think it's particularly illuminating to look at DC in context, using the map option that displays income change over the past decade.  This is the first decade in like, forever that incomes generally went down (not for the top 1%, of course, but for just about everyone else).  But this wasn't universally the case, and the geographic distribution is most revealing.  Let's start by looking at DC in a broad, more-than-half-of-the-country overview, and then zoom in:


[Click to Enlarge in New Window]

Closer:


[Click to Enlarge in New Window]

Closer:


[Click to Enlarge in New Window]

Beltway:

Now let's look at the census tract figures for four census tracts close to the seats of power:

And five more tracts:

Now, if you lived in this kind of economic environment, how out of touch with average Americans would you be?

Now add on 24/7 corporate propaganda, and more lobbyists per square inch than anywhere in at least 10 light years or so, and, well, you get the picture.  There's just no way these people can possibly have a clue... that they don't have a clue.

Paul Rosenberg :: Economic apartheid... with MAPS!

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
While I appreciate the maps & the data, the proof and the pudding of your argument (4.00 / 1)
And I agree, if the Versailles elites at least saw a normal American once or twice a year beyond crowds at a fundraising rally, they might be tempted to gain access to something resembling empathy, or even sanity.

Actually having real people, representing real people, so that real people issues would already be understood, even before attempting to find that pesky 'empathy' (I know I left it in the closet beside the holiday decorations, it must have been moved when we got the new Japanese bathroom design for the Master bedroom ensuite) and would therefore not need a focus group to understand the inclination to have "shelter," "a job" or "food."

There's just no way these people can possibly have a clue... that they don't have a clue.

But I have to say, these people, this collection of sycophants and hangers-on, this gaggle of desperate fawning late empire courtiers, couldn't find a clue if you covered them in clue juice, set them down in the middle of the clue herd, at the height of clue mating season.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


My experience with politicians says... (0.00 / 0)
...the real wealth is not reported and the favors escape the view of IRS. With offshore accounts and other devices our elected and appointed officials can gain fortunes by playing ball with corps and elites. It used to be called bribery, but even that term has been rarely used or investigated by media.

Bribery Is As Old As The Hills (4.00 / 2)
And sure, it's a part of the mix.

But things have changed substantially over the past 30-40 years, and we're talking about something much more pervasive than individual acts of bribery.  We're talking about an inability to even see that there's a real problem in a country that's quite literally falling apart.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
isn't the election system partly behind this? (0.00 / 0)
what do you expect when a candidate has to have millions to have a shot at winning in the vast majority of the races?

public financing is needed very badly...


Yes, That's Part of It (0.00 / 0)
But far from being the whole ball of wax.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
It would be great if all this inequality were simply ignorance (4.00 / 1)
And of course that explanation gives hope to those without these benefits.  But I think it is just as likely that these people do know about the "other" people and just don't give a shit.

Take for instance my congressman, Kurt Schrader.  A cunning individual.  He is a veterinarian and farmer.  Runs as a Democrat.  I have voted for him twice.  His votes in this recent issue of tax cuts passed yesterday are very telling.  Now this crafty little bastard wants to run as a Democrat, not so unlike Obama, because his conscience or something just doesn't allow him to go down the road of fantasy politics and economics demanded of nominate able GOP candidates. So he spends his time as a congressman calling himself a "Blue Dog" and trying desperately to satisfy his leadership and mixed working class and upper middle income electorate that he is a true soldier.  Of course, veterinarian/farmers are not working class.  They are much more upper middle income, if not well to do.  So we have the true Shakespearian Dichotomy of elitist liberal politics.  I.e., I have to be true to my own class for the need of self-preservation, but I am also benevolent and must have sympathy for the people.  

And how does he accomplish this?   Well take the recent tax cut bill.  He conveniently votes against the amendment to adjust the inheritance tax back to traditional levels, but votes against the bill as a whole, which he knows will be safely passed.  So in one fell swoop he protects his own interests and those of his class, while creating the "intentional" illusion of concern for those who elected him.

I'm sorry, I just don't see the evidence that if these people met a working class stiff they might identify with him.  They know exactly what they are doing.  My only puzzlement is, why would working people keep holding out hope that these people would offer any hope for the future?  Now or in 100 years?  I see no more fact based evidence that people will have any greater salvation with this doctrine than with hope for the kingdom of God.  

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


I think the point stands (0.00 / 0)
but I'm not sure about the measure.  Do these numbers reflect actual improvement for the people in DC, or do they reflect increasing gentrifiction (i.e. richer people displacing poorer people, rather than people becoming more wealthy)? Looking at some of the neighborhoods I am more familiar with in NE, I suspect it is the latter (although there is no reason to think the same process is operating across all the neighborhoods in DC, which are very different).  

Unemployment numbers might be a better measure (but they obviously only capture one element of insecurity), or foreclosures.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


That said (0.00 / 0)
there is no doubt that the Village is totally separated from those who are suffering - their world is different from the rest of the country, and even from the other neighborhoods in DC.  For example, the Washington Post barely noticed what goes on outside of NW.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]
Clarification (0.00 / 0)
It's not really important for my point which is the more predominant trend.  The world they inhabit is one in which things are just getting better and better.  If it's by things getting better and better for the same people all around them, or if there's more churning, so that those who aren't doing better get replaced by those who are, the end result is the same, in terms of the environment it creates.

Does this make more sense to you?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Definitely (0.00 / 0)
The world they inhabit is one in which things are just getting better and better.

This is the key, and it's undeniable.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS