Bloggers and Donors: A Donor's Perspective

by: Rob McKay

Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 10:20


( - promoted by Chris Bowers)

New Progressive Coalition and Democracy Alliance have both sent very thoughtful and interesting responses to my recent post on bloggers and donors, and I encourage folks to read them and respond. I like both of the posts a lot, and I think their ideas about how to move forward are useful. I have also gotten a lot of other constructive feedback from individuals in the donor, and plan to do another post soon on this topic. -Mike

First of all, I would like to thank OpenLeft for the opportunity to respond to your post about connecting donors to the blogosphere, and offer some insight from one donor's perspective as well as some insight into the Democracy Alliance organization. 

As a longtime donor to progressive causes and campaigns, I have witnessed the evolution of the progressive movement.  As a Board member for a number of progressive organizations, including Mother Jones and the Ms. Foundation for Women, I've had valuable insight into the challenges facing organizations as they seek out individual donors for the multi-year funding that is crucial for building capacity.  Over the years that I have been involved in the progressive movement as a donor and activist, the environment has changed significantly. I believe there are powerful forces and constituencies that are replacing the old guard and bringing new voices and new ideas into the process.  I have grown frustrated with the approach of "targeting" voters through expensive television ads that often miss the intended audience by a mile.  I believe that blogs, and other new media tools, are a more efficient way to reach voters and we must find ways to support this work.  As an individual donor I have supported and will continue to support bloggers, and the use of new technology and the online space to reach critical audiences who are often missed by more traditional media.

Political events in 2000, 2002, and 2004 galvanized the progressive movement at all levels.  Progressives came together across the country, in a variety of ways, to unite around shared beliefs and a shared desire for change.  As a Democracy Alliance Partner since its founding in 2005, and Board chair for the past year, I've seen firsthand exactly how much we've accomplished in the two years since our inception and I'm heartened to see the movement expanding on all fronts.

The netroots community and blogosphere have grown in the last several years into a powerful force that was almost unimaginable just a few years ago.  In the last two years the Democracy Alliance has begun to form a first of its kind community of donors committed to strengthening democracy by partnering with, making human and financial investments in, and fostering collaboration among leaders and institutions committed to building a sustainable progressive infrastructure.

In his post Mike correctly enumerated some crucial barriers to funding the blogosphere, and the near impossibility of realizing a significant impact by giving to individuals.  However, those barriers are neither permanent nor insurmountable.  As an individual progressive funder I, and others like me, will continue to fund bloggers and those who are making progressive change happen.  As a Partner in the Democracy Alliance the goal is to fund collaboratively, and as the Chairman of the Democracy Alliance, we look forward to finding opportunities to support the entire netroots community through organizations and institutions that are enabling the long-term health and sustainability of the community.

I hope this marks the beginning of an honest and productive conversation between donors and the netroots, about how to leverage the power of both groups to move forward in a strategic and effective partnership.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, and the Democracy Alliance staff, I want to thank you again for the opportunity to share my thoughts.

Rob McKay
Chairman
Democracy Alliance

Rob McKay :: Bloggers and Donors: A Donor's Perspective

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
OpenLeft already paying dividends (0.00 / 0)
I just wanted to quickly say thank you for responding to Mike's really insightful post! It's really great that Matt, Chris, and Mike have a created a space where activists, beltway insiders, and progressive donors can come together and chat in a public forum.

As one of the tens-of-thousands of activists who came into the party through the dot-org boom, I have spent the last 2+ years mystified why the funding for new and interesting political organizations seemed to dry up after 2004. Though I am very grateful that a few wealthy donors helped to turn me onto a life of politics, I was a bit saddened, and very confused, by how things went down. For example, I personally saw an amazing amount of progress and potential while doing youth political outreach with Music for America, beginning in 2003, but the subsequent decline and "flame out" of that group and the lack of any culture oriented youth political outreach groups since then left me really confused about the nature of the funding world and what wealthy progressive donors were really trying to accomplish. And I would say that a big reason for this confusion was due to the opaque nature of the progressive funding world. Sure, we read about the donors, and occasionally meet them, but most of us don't have any long term relationships with these donors, nor do we (or at least I) really understand the view from their perspective.

Anyway, the fact that this conversation is happening in the public sphere, where any interested party can not only view it, but chime in, is pretty amazing. Kudos once again to the OL crew for creating a real bridge between a few different spheres that I don't believe have come together in one online public space before (at least not consistently).

And thanks again for responding!


One point (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for coming by. One point I wanted to throw out there is that make sure when you "continue to fund bloggers," that the independent, less institutionally connected bloggers get a piece of the pie. I know that a lot of people in D.C. are presenting themselves as people who can reach the netroots, or who represent the blogosphere, but not many of them are actually from our community. Just like with "all natural" food products, check the ingredients before trusting anyone who says that funding their organization will mean funding the blogosphere. In many cases, it isn't really true. 


Concrete Solutions (0.00 / 0)
Overall, I'm very glad to see DA coming out of their shell like this and engaging in the conversation.  We need a lot more transparency from the donor world.  That could get rid of a lot of misunderstanding and even enmity between potential allies.

I agree with Chris's point about "institutional" bloggers/blogging consultants vs. actual bloggers who have built this stuff from the ground up.

Also, this is a good start:

In his post Mike correctly enumerated some crucial barriers to funding the blogosphere, and the near impossibility of realizing a significant impact by giving to individuals.  However, those barriers are neither permanent nor insurmountable.  As an individual progressive funder I, and others like me, will continue to fund bloggers and those who are making progressive change happen.  As a Partner in the Democracy Alliance the goal is to fund collaboratively, and as the Chairman of the Democracy Alliance, we look forward to finding opportunities to support the entire netroots community through organizations and institutions that are enabling the long-term health and sustainability of the community.

But next time, I would like to hear about more concrete examples and solutions from a donor perspective.

Youth To Power: How Today's Young Voters Are Building Tomorrow's Progressive Majority


criteria (4.00 / 1)
As a Board member for a number of progressive organizations, including Mother Jones and the Ms. Foundation for Women, I've had valuable insight into the challenges facing organizations as they seek out individual donors for the multi-year funding that is crucial for building capacity.

I'd like to hear how you approach evaluating these organizations.  It's not clear to me that Mother Jones, for instance, is a progressive organization that creates social change or that building capacity for them is a good or useful thing to do.  I'm not much of a Mother Jones reader to be honest.  But when I read their issue on Web 2.0, I was surprised at both the poor quality, straw man argumentation and the elitist outlook.  It read a lot like the kind of article you'd read in mainstream media outlets over the past five years attempting to undermine internet progressives.

Jay Rosen had a useful discussion on his blog, Pressthink.  Why build capacity for Mother Jones?  I'm obviously not aware of all facets of the magazine so I could be wrong about the merits of the place, I'm just kind of curious.


How to fund (0.00 / 0)
Rob, thanks for posting. On alternative to funding individual bloggers would be to commission competitions for innovative infrastructure (or policy or campaign) development in the blogosphere and commit to funding the winners. Obviously, Matt and Chris have their BlogPac competition going on right now and will be giving $5000 to 5 winners (along with some other potentially very valuable benefits). But if bigger donors could commit to increasingly those amounts -- say, 10 fold -- that could presumably make a major difference in the viability and success of some of these projects (not that they've been unveiled yet).


Additional comment from one donor's perspective (0.00 / 0)
I don't want to pull too far away from the main thread of this discussion about bloggers and donors, but want to briefly share my thoughts about the larger question of how to best support social change.

While most of my giving is directly focused on progressive infrastructure, campaigns and candidates, I also believe that we need a broad understanding of what we mean when we talk about - as you do - a progressive organization that "creates social change." That work takes place in many different arenas, not just the political. As a result, many donors I know take a "portfolio" approach to supporting progressive organizations, just as they do with their investment portfolios. An effective portfolio should feature a range of investments, and media (and more specifically in my opinion, journalism) has to be a part of a donor portfolio,  I have supported and will continue to support the work that Mother Jones is doing.  Rather than getting into the specifics, I will let the Mother Jones folks respond directly. 

I would like to reiterate a commitment to finding ways for donors to support the entire progressive blogging community, and my hope is that this is the beginning of a conversation about how to make that happen.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS