An Economy of Corruption

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Oct 06, 2008 at 16:14


Back in March, Elizabeth Warren blogged about a hearing by the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit on credit card tricks and traps for consumers.  The consumers who showed up to testify were told "they couldn't talk unless they would sign a waiver that would permit the credit card companies to make public anything they wanted to tell about their financial records, their credit histories, their purchases, and so on."  This was a deal by the Republicans and Democrats on the committee "to be fair to the credit card lenders."

This was back in March.  I blogged about it as follows.

For some time going forward, there's going to be lots of econo-speak about bail-outs and Federal Reserve tools to manage insolvent banks, but remember one basic fact.  You can't run a political system and an economy based on loan-sharking, intimidation, and socialism for the rich and powerful.  Now, that might sound like a screed, but it's not.  I'm not just saying that the rich stealing from the public is a bad thing, I'm saying that it no longer works because there isn't enough left to steal such that the theft can be hidden.  Our policy apparatus is falling apart when it has to resort to bribery and threats.
Matt Stoller :: An Economy of Corruption
As the large financial shocks continue, focus on who is going to pay.  That's the key.  There will be a cramdown of consumption in this country, and this is the part of the constitutional restoration when the monetary order collapses and political shockwaves drive a new set of actors into the decision-making elite.  Policies right now are designed to benefit the wealthy and powerful at the expense of everyone else.  This can no longer be hidden, which means that we are at the point where change is really possible.

I'm not some incredible seer, I got suckered into the dot com bubble like a lot of young people at that time.  But when I saw the greed and corruption of this decade in the housing bubble, and friends buying houses on spec, I realized very early on, as did many others, that greed and corruption don't work when they become system-wide.  They aren't efficient, they don't produce things people want, and they can only succeed as long as subterfuge holds up, and then brute force beyond that.

There's a lot of techno-babble from experts around our economy, but at the end of the day, if you didn't see the housing bubble by 2005 you are an idiot or a conservative (but I repeat myself).  The $700 billion bailout, proposed and run by these people, is similarly a moment of failure for these elites.  Ultimately, an economy won't work unless it has some measure of accountability and feedback that corresponds to productive work.  


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Program Hope (0.00 / 0)
I recently put up an Instapopulist on The Economic Populist quoting some more of Credit Slips where Warren and others are now blogging, specifically to the consumer credit issues as well as the financial crisis.

The HOPE program is turning out to be yet another hollow empty promise (as analyzed) yet we cannot get Congress to do their jobs and stop this absurd lobbyists' bidding agenda.

Even worse, from today's hearing, it's clear many in Congress truly don't understand what is going on...
they railed about CEO pay, which assuredly is an issue but in terms of Lehman, AIG and this mess....not the bottom line to this issue which is derivatives, SIVs, CDOS, CDSes.

They are not addressing this or even asking how such a ponzi scheme was allowed and what to do about it now.

Honestly I think the DPC and others should sit the entire Congress down and give them a derivatives and structured finance 101 crash course.  It's like they are clueless on what's really happening  

How can they realize they should be doing a HOLC if they do not even understand the issues?

On EP, a good post by Caldaro Origins of Subprime:  Derivatives while incredibly wordy, goes into depth on the history of the Shadow Banking system.


NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


"you are an idiot or a conservative" (0.00 / 0)
"if you didn't see the housing bubble by 2005"
Hmm.
Ok, I saved my bacon again. However, how about "Be excellent to each other!"? I'm sure I read this somewhere...

hmmmm (4.00 / 1)
While I'm not so sure a conservative qualifies anyone...
idiot sure does.  I saw people signing up for 10% $4k a month with a balloon payment coming buying up properties, thinking they could get $1500/mon. by renting some "rooms" in it...in an area where the average wage is $13/hr..

They were all about flipping the property, oblivious to local economies, the realities of what they were doing...
and seriously not even adding two numbers together...
I was listening to all of this, shaking my head, completely aware of the Dot Con crash...anyone even remotely technical knew this story, lured with phony options to lose their ass...and their own careers in Silly valley.  

so people were....absolutely stupid thinking this would not crash or that they personally would not get burned.

Then, there were many others who wanted to get a home who had bad credit and magically these lenders snowed them like no tomorrow with interest only, ARM options, you name it making them think they just got a $300k mortgage principle for $775/month and the people just didn't get that it wasn't financing magic... it was a bait and switch and they were more screwed than before.

Even worse on that story, many of them were doing this....
because they couldn't afford the rent they were paying.

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


[ Parent ]
I was thinking more about the other readers here (0.00 / 0)
Does anybody have to accept to be called an idiot simply because he didn't pay attention to the few casandras in 2005 and didn't care much about the details of the housing market? That goes a bit too far, imho.

[ Parent ]
we're all idiots (4.00 / 1)
(except for me of course! ;))

I've been extremely critical during the primary that Progressives were not demanding actual policy positions to turn the economy around, analyzing policy positions, following the money and so on...

and this is the reason why.  One cannot jump on soup can labels of candidates or even parties thinking that solves the problem because the corruption, lobbyists control both parties, most candidates.  

Now here we are with the other post calling this Obama's Bay of Pigs, others are stupid but we're stupid because people didn't listen to history, to policy and to detailed analysis.  

So, how's that...everybody is an idiot and now it's time to demand policy, which is frankly way more boring, so maybe we can make it fun....but votes, policy, money is where it's really at.  

We've been writing about all of this (on EP, link below) in truth but getting people to even read something with graphs, numbers, obscure funky things like a CDS or some obscure SEC ruling ain't easy.    It makes your econ 101 class looking like the study of Saturday Night Live.  

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


[ Parent ]
casandras (4.00 / 2)
Does anybody have to accept to be called an idiot simply because he didn't pay attention to the few casandras in 2005 and didn't care much about the details of the housing market?

Yes, because we had already seen the impeachment, the dot com bubble, the recount, and Iraq.  Fool me five times....


[ Parent ]
And they couldn't afford the rent (4.00 / 1)
because of those other people, buying up houses at inflated values in order to flip them.

Like you said, "oblivious to local economies."

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
Yes, they ruined the market for everybody else (0.00 / 0)
and so even generally responsible people jumped on the train and bought at inflated prices, with mortgages they could hardly afford, because they feared prices and rents would climb out of their reach soon. Exposed to the constant rah rah rah from realtors, mortgage lenders, politicians, and even the TV ("flip that house"!), it took good nerves and a high dose of financial responsibility to not surrender to the craze. A tragic drama.

[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
What you wrote sounds a lot like Karl Marx's analysis.  And I mean that as a compliment.

great post (0.00 / 0)
There's a lot of techno-babble from experts around our economy, but at the end of the day, if you didn't see the housing bubble by 2005 you are an idiot or a conservative (but I repeat myself).

I remember when Dow 36,000 came out in 1999 or 2000 arguing that stocks were at 1/3 the value they should be at the height of the dot com boom.  That was funny.

What I'm more at a loss for is what you do with yourself when you come to realize that the entire political class has not just lost its mind, but that it hasn't even realized that its lost its mind despite acknowledging that theres a "crisis" and that "something" needs to be done.   I suppose its step one of the twelve steps.  

Maybe.


Hehehe! (0.00 / 0)
I remember reading from Brad Delong that Dow36000 was even based on a false calculation! Those dumbasses. And then, of course, their most idiotic move was to pretend for years that their oracle would still come true. Lunatics!

This makes it even more mind boggling to see that the co-author became an economic advisor of McVain. For heaven's sake, how badly does someone have to screw up before people finally realize he's an idiot???


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox