New York Moves to Reverse the Class War

by: David Sirota

Wed Jan 21, 2009 at 11:00



A few weeks ago, I wrote a column about the need for states and the federal government to get serious about raising taxes on the super-rich in order to make all the rhetoric about "shared sacrifice" in this moment of economic emergency a necessary reality. In my column, I noted that New York Gov. David Paterson (D) was inexplicably trying to prevent tax increases on his state's millionaires while pushing a budget that slashed safety-net programs and raised taxes on the working class. Now, Democrats in New York's legislature, who have taken full control of both chambers for the first time in four decades, are fighting back:
David Sirota :: New York Moves to Reverse the Class War
There is a growing sense in the capital that legislators are likely to turn to an income tax increase on the wealthiest New Yorkers to help close the state's $15 billion deficit, now that Democrats control the Senate, the Assembly and the governor's office.

The Assembly, where Democrats have an overwhelming majority, has long supported increasing taxes on the wealthy, and Sheldon Silver, the Assembly speaker, reiterated this month that there continued to be strong backing for the measure among his colleagues.

That could leave the matter in the hands of the Senate, where Democrats won a narrow majority in November. Senator Eric T. Schneiderman, a Manhattan Democrat, said that he planned to introduce a bill in the coming weeks that would increase taxes on the rich, and that he expected his colleagues to have an active debate about the issue.

"There are a lot of us who feel that for the last 30 years we've been shifting the tax burden from the wealthy to middle-class families," Mr. Schneiderman said on Tuesday. "Our conference is operating through consultation and discussion, and I expect we'll be talking about restoring some additional tax brackets for upper-income New Yorkers as well as a lot of other options."

In my work as a board member of the Progressive States Network, and in my reporting on New York state politics for The Uprising, I have come to know Schneiderman as one of the nation's most promising and aggressive progressives in local politics. This guy is a movement progressive through and through, and, as the Times notes, he's going up against his own Majority Leader, Malcolm Smith, to try to equalize the tax system in one of the most unequal states in America. And he's doing it in a state where it's clearly necessary. As the Times reports, "since the mid-1970s, the state has cut its top tax rate from 15.375 percent to 6.85 percent," giving it the lowest top tax rate in the tri-state area.

Polls show New Yorkers overwhelmingly support raising taxes on millionaires instead of slashing basic services. That gives Schneiderman and Empire State progressives the wind at their back in what will likely shape up to be one of the most important intra-party fights in the country. New York is, after all, one of the largest economies on the planet, and so taking real steps toward tax fairness there will have national implications, especially considering such steps will require a battle with the state's powerful elite.

If you live in New York, get in touch with your legislator and ask that they support tax fairness, and then join the Working Families Party, which has been the key backer of these kinds of populist economic fights.

Otherwise, stay tuned - this kind of tax fight is likely coming to your state as budget deficits get worse.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
tax rates (4.00 / 2)
Way to go!  Let's bring back 90% top rates!

Now if only Wisconsin Democrats were that progressive...


Tax the rich! (4.00 / 2)
Hiking taxes on the rich is a policy that is way past due in America. I'm glad to hear this is a possibility in NY!    

Adam Smith... (0.00 / 0)
...the wingnuts' patron saint also advocated taxing the rich...

His premise was not altruistic, but practical.  The rich are the ones who have the money!  Why bother taxing people that don't!

It was one of his 4 principles of fair taxation.

Make sure to tell that to every wingnut you see!


Scheniderman is fine (0.00 / 0)
but upping tax rates on he rich wont work long term...and that is what New York needs now - long term stable source of tax revenue. But the taxes fall most heavily on mobile things like people, jobs, businesses, buildings (which can be left and abandoned), transactions.

so what can you tax that doesnt move? that is valuable? that isnt taxed now? that is progressive?

oh, I know . land.

Land ownership tracks very closely with wealth.

here is a proposal

http://www.dailykos.com/commen...


Why? (0.00 / 0)
Why wouldn't taxing the rich work long term?  Patterson has made an argument like this, saying that corporations would leave if taxes got raised.  This argument is pretty bad, since of course most of the corporations in New York City would not leave unless the city sank, and because you can make sure the tax burden falls more on corporations in the city than on upstate businesses.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left
PREMIUM AD

ADVERTISEMENTS


MENU

OpenLeft in your inbox!

 

Or, subscribe to each author individually.