Positive feedback loops for progressives

by: OpenLeft

Mon Dec 28, 2009 at 10:00


A Chris Bowers Golden Oldie
From Tue Oct 09, 2007.
Original HERE.


Amidst the series of Bush Dog fueled Democratic capitulations in Congress that have become so regular it has become possible to organize around them several weeks ahead of time, it is important for progressive movement types to keep their eyes on the most important legislation and potential legislation facing our movement. No, I am not referring to Iraq or FISA, and to a somewhat lesser extent I am not referring to health care or clean energy either. Instead, I am referring to those key areas of legislation and Democratic Party behavior that have the potential to build progressivism itself. As Matt as discussed in recent length pieces such as Emergence Politics and Rush Limbaugh, and The Broken Market for Democratic Primaries, what progressives need are the creation and institutionalization of "positive feedback loops" that will make America a more progressive place, and thus make all other progressive policy more likely to be enacted.

What are these policies? Here is an incomplete list that I compiled this afternoon:

  • The Employee Free Choice Act, that would, ideally, increase union density and collective bargaining power in America. Union members are much more likely to support progressive economic policies, and to vote Democratic, than other non-union workers. This would effectively create an ideological shift within the American workplace that would favor progressives, as long as it came with union leadership willing to ramp up new organizing efforts.
  • Clean Election Laws. While I am well aware that Democrats have demonstrated an ability to surpass Republican fundraising in Presidential elections, the fact is that progressives will never be able to match corporate PAC money in all federal elections. Until some form of public financing removes this corporate advantage, progressives will always be at an influence disadvantage over Congress.
  • Reversing Corporate Media Consolidation. Using improved ownership regulation of American media to help destabilize the impact of the Republican Noise Machine, and create a more diverse, responsive national media, is another key progressive feedback loop.
  • Progressive Immigration Reform. Securing the ideological and partisan loyalties of expanding demographic groups in America is a pretty obvious key to long-term political success. This remains as true among Latinos and Asians in our current era as it was among Irish, Italian, and Slavic immigrants a century ago. Whoever captures emerging political markets is well-positioned for electoral and legislative success over the next few decades. One of the keys to pulling this off always starts with immigration policy and rhetoric that improve the lives of newcomers to America, and make them feel welcomed. Truly, a no-brainer for long-term progressive success.
  • Colonial Reform. Perhaps I am using overly provocative language to describe this one, but granting full congressional representation to those areas of America not current represented by full voting members in Congress would be a big step forward for progressives. This obviously includes anti-Republican strongholds in D.C. and Puerto Rico, but should also include territories like Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. These are not places that are particularly friendly to the values of the conservative movement, and granting them equal representation within their own country would expand progressive and Democratic power long-term.
  • Re-locating government spending. It isn't a secret that the conservative economy is fueled significantly by government hand-outs in the form of military industrial complex spending, reliance on oil companies, "faith based initiatives," and tax breaks / loopholes for corporations and the wealthy alike. De-funding the conservative economy, and re-locating spending in programs Americans won't want to give up, such as universal health care or cheaper, clean energy investment, would to at least some extent shift the economic balance of power away from conservatives and toward progressives.
  • Voting Reform. Same day voter registration, the end of felony disenfranchisement, and secure voting mechanisms will all help increase voter turnout in ways that favor progressives. When more minorities vote, more young people vote, more people have confidence in the vote, and it is easier to vote overall, the longstanding conservative tactic of voter suppression as a means of winning elections will be significantly reduced in effectiveness.

I am sure that there are more potential positive feedback loops for progressives than these, and if you have more I'd love to see them in the comments. The seven I list here are a mix of good government reforms, spending relocations, and shifts in control over ideological apparatuses that I think would undoubtedly make the country more progressives. This are the low-hanging positive feedback loops, so to speak. I am sure there are others, but I wanted to get these out there as a way of reminding progressives that no matter what the major issues of the day might be in the short term, there are fundamental goals we must always seek in order to build a more progressive America long term.  

OpenLeft :: Positive feedback loops for progressives

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Then, complaints about "bush dogs"; today, its about mytical third way? (0.00 / 0)
Don't get this - capitulation to bush dogs was bad in 2007, but 2009 posts claim that capitulating and giving obama/rahm/dem leaderhips a free pass on breaking campaign promises (pandering for votes) is OK and good because it is somehow part of the inevitable (and bogus) "third way" - almost a natural law like gravity!

What is it with you? (4.00 / 1)
Does this mean that from now on whenever any Chris Bowers diary is posted on Open Left that we have to put up with your whining about Chris being a "turncoat" and a "sell-out?" I have no idea what your agenda is but you can't advance it very effectively or persuasively with these persistent personal rants. You're lucky you haven't been banned.

[ Parent ]
Haven't called him either (0.00 / 0)
And read the threads - he is the first to attack someone that doesn't agree with posts that say we should passively support dems because of the mythical "third way."

I am merely pointing out what many perceive to be a hole in the logic.  


[ Parent ]
And hijacking every single thread attributed to Chris (0.00 / 0)
is the best way to "win" your argument? Like you expect everyone to drop whatever they're coming to a thread to discuss and to rush over to another thread to read your brilliant polemic? Can't you fathom that this would be really irritating?

[ Parent ]
Haven't hijacked any threads (0.00 / 0)
What's the matter - can't what you think or say stand up to critical analysis?

Are you so small in your thinking that anyone else's point of view is a threat?

Is your definition of "progressive" or "liberal" following marching orders from people that have anointed themselves the "elite" and know better than everyone else?

I can't take credit for the fact that so many progressive/liberals are challenging the leadership and the conventional wisedom - wish I could.

And this isn't just happening on the threads here - it is happening all across netroots, even the once tightly "on-message" kos.

No one is hijacking - they are just challenging the people that say progressives need to vote dem or they will kill a puppy.

And if you wanted to see meaningful change (and maybe you don't), this is a good thing.


[ Parent ]
Oh I am so threatened (0.00 / 0)
Sorry arnie. You're dead to me.  

[ Parent ]
Great (0.00 / 0)
your ideas are dead to me, but would be grateful if you wouldn't flame me (or anyone else) because a growing number of progressive/liberals are not going to accept the bogus "third way" arguments that try to rationalize being pandered to and exploited.

If being "dead to you" means you will leave me alone, not post lies and misrepresentations, that is OK by me.  The obama/rahm cult is losing a big part of its core support and you are not going to change that.

They could, by showing they are working on delivering "yes we can" and "change you can believe in".

Unfortunately, they are clearly sending the message that they are going to do exactly the opposite and it has reached a tipping point over the HCR sham.  


[ Parent ]
I seem to remember this "golden oldies" series began with a post (0.00 / 0)
that one diarist did not supply a listing of diaries, making the task of identifying posts more work for those responsible for reposts.

Could it be that inconsistencies between older posts that sought to organize progressives/liberal for change and new posts that proclaim a mythical "third way" politics demand progressives quietly accept being sold out have something to do with said listing not being available?


"third way" (4.00 / 1)
That phrase already has a very loaded meaning in American lexicon.  You're clearly referring to something else Chris wrote, but I have no idea what it is.  Could you link to something where Chris outlines this "third way"?

[ Parent ]
http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=16648 (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Could be construed as fairly demeaning to those (0.00 / 0)
that believe anything other than the author's opinion/analysis, which tries to create a scenario of limited choices (ridiculing those he doesn't agree with) and justifying those limited choices by a mythological "third way" that is nothing more than accepting the status quo.

[ Parent ]
Blame it on me (4.00 / 1)
Actually it was me who suggesting revisiting this diary. And I would prefer to have a substantive discussion about what the diary is actually about rather than having the thread hijacked by someone who appears to have some kind of personal vendetta with the diarist.

[ Parent ]
Good to see this great post again (4.00 / 1)
I keep coming back to this, as its easy to get lost in the day to day battles and miss these longer term dynamics.  We need a lot more of this sort of thinking.

While it's true that focusing on these issues would have a longer term impact on progressives politics, even here I am left wondering how to get there. That is, some of these issues are things that can be organized around at the state level (voting reform, clean election laws, government spending)  while several can only be addressed at the federal level (EFCA, colonies, media and immigration)- making it far more difficult in the short run. Some elements in the latter category could be dealt with in a more piece meal fashion at the state or local level.  

Who are the best keepers of the people's liberties? The people themselves. The sacred trust can be no where so safe as in the hands most interested in preserving it.
James Madison


Other potential positive feedback loops (4.00 / 1)
Education? This was suggested in comments in the original diary and many agreed. But a recent diary by John Emerson gives me some doubt. He finds:
"In 2008 high school dropouts were Obama's best educational demographic at 63%. Voters with advanced degrees were next best at 58%, with HS graduates and those with some college giving Obama respectively 52% and 51% of their votes. At 50%, college graduates without advanced degrees were Obama's worst demographic."

Of course, many of those in the white conservative demographic are the ones with the most access to education. And the type of education is a significant influence too.

Agricultural reform? Dismantling corporate monopolies controlling agriculture would appear to reinforce the progressive movement as it would democratize access to the market, localize production, and diversify food supplies. But it could also lead to higher food prices that poor people have to pay at the store (albeit for healthier food). And local farmers often stubborn libertarians.


Supra-Policy Positive Feedback Loop (0.00 / 0)
I do not disagree that the policies you list may provide positive feedback for the left. Long-term.

Shorter term, its about follow through and delivering on these (or any other) policies that come up for debate and vote. Thus, "supra-policy".

Its very simple: 1) Campaign on particular policy positions and make specific promises to work for those policy outcomes. 2) Garner financial and voting support from those who agree with your policy positions. 3) Follow through on your promises. Even if you lose the battle, you stick to the principles upon which your campaign promises were based and you can maintain support among your "base". 4) Because you have not abandoned your position because of political expediency or in the face of opposition, real or imagined, your base is positively influenced and the feed-back loop is established.

Unless this kind of electoral feed-back loop can be established we will continue to be "sold out" and "thrown under the bus" by plutocrats that tell us what we want to hear during the campaign, then forget about the "base" until they need another infusion of cash, or a few votes to keep them in office.



"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


Donate to Open Left










Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search