Why Not Colbert?

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 20:00:00 PM EDT


The Colbert Report is my favorite show on television. Moving well beyond the Daily Show, there is a wonderful depth, richness and variety to Colbert's humor that moves past holier than thou snark and not truly critical pastiche to instead embrace biting cultural satire that does indeed have an ulterior motive. The Colbert Report is a direct attack on contemporary conservatism, self-obsession, plutocracy, media culture, and even our national iconography. His speech at the White House correspondents dinner will go down as an all-time classic in political satire of speaking truth to power:



You can watch parts two and three here. I think the best thing about the speech is that he was invited to give it by people who clearly didn't understand his act. This is understandable, really. As a culture, we have been so inundated with pastiche over the last twenty years that it is hard to recognize actual satire when it comes along. Frank Rich was correct when he wrote:

Writing six months later, New York Times columnist Frank Rich called Colbert's after-dinner speech a "cultural primary" and christened it the "defining moment" of the United States' 2006 midterm election

I agree that this was a defining cultural moment. Colbert's satire at the dinner went beyond mere respectful joking about the institutional power structure in America, and also beyond "a pox on both your houses" snark that posits both the person dishing out the snark and the audience receiving it as superior to the subject being mocked. The former is what we often see on late night talk shows, and the latter is what we see on the Daily Show. Colbert, instead, actively uses his humor to expose a corrupt and dangerous set of institutional power structures in America, and does so from a decidedly partisan ideological perspective. It isn't meant to please everyone--not even close. Whether or not someone thinks his humor "crossed the line" is demonstrative of how one feels about our existing institutional power structures.

So, now Stephan Colbert is trying to get on the ballot for both the Republican and Democratic primaries in South Carolina, and he seems quite serious about it. In fact, he will appear on Meet the Press this weekend to discuss it, which should be brilliant if it is anything like his speech at the correspondents' dinner. Given all of this, I have to admit that if I lived in South Carolina, I would be tempted to vote for Colbert in the primary. While, in the end, it is still just comedy and satire, I am always looking for candidates who come from a similar cultural perspective on the utterly broken state of some of our most powerful institutions in America. Colbert "gets" that to a degree few other candidates in the past ten years have ever gotten that. While that isn't enough to make someone a good President, it is a start.

So, I hope that Colbert makes it onto the ballot. I doubt he will receive more than 1% of the vote, but it should be fun to watch anyway. It looks like an amusing form of protest that incorporates the primary process. And it also should be fun to watch him mock Tim Russert to his face on Sunday morning.

Chris Bowers :: Why Not Colbert?
Tags: culture, satire, Stephan Colbert, (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Why Not Colbert? | 19 comments
To me, the funniest thinga bout that correspondent's dinner (4.00 / 1)
is that the only person in the audience actually laughing is Antonin Scalia. 

Opposite for me. (4.00 / 2)
The funniest thing for me was that the rest of the room was not laughing.

That means that they got it. It was like the little boy pointing out the naked king, and the entire audience KNEW, but couldn't admit he was right. What an extraordinary indictment of the DC punditocracy!


[ Parent ]
Meet the Press (4.00 / 2)
I can only imagine the Russert trying to engage in his "gotcha" style and Colbert responding with:

Colbert: Tim, we're not here to talk about the past, that's something for the unshaven liberal history professors to discuss.  We're hear to talk about my candidacy to Renew America with Manly Vigor, or RAMV for short.

Russert: But you deny doing [whatever the transgression that Russert has dug up]

Colbert: I could be wrong Tim, but I think YOU'RE consorting hand in hand with those very same liberal history professors I'm talking about.

Russert: But... but....

Colbert: USA! USA! USA!

It's kinda like Brownback, but funnier.


Eclipsing the Daily Show (0.00 / 0)
I think you've really hit on something, and I find your characterization of his style as distinct from Stewart or Leno completely right.

I think this has eluded a wider understanding because the Daily Show is still really good, and Stewart has rightly earned his status as a comedy legend.

But Colbert's theme and message is far more insightful, purposeful and ultimately agreeable.

I think it is no coincidence that he defended Daily Kos and not Stewart.  Stewart really does get it better than Stewart, or at least he's more willing to show that he gets it.


Rudy Giuliani sucks


He's there to make jokes (0.00 / 0)
Its what he always says. Yes he's a committed democrat in real life but his agenda is to make people laugh by playing a high-class poor informed idiot. Stewart is just not confrontational by nature, the only time he gets mad is when the 4th estate takes a long vacation. They are not so much critics of policies but they are critics of the lack of traditional media involvement. They would like to see a return of policy over process, I think thats the main thing.

[ Parent ]
Hmmm (0.00 / 0)
"I think it is no coincidence that he defended Daily Kos and not Stewart."

Steward defended Daily Kos too. Colbert devoted more time to it, but both defended it. 


[ Parent ]
Colbert had Kos on (0.00 / 0)
But your point is fair enough.


Rudy Giuliani sucks

[ Parent ]
But if Colbert runs for President (0.00 / 0)
He'd have to leave his tv show.  I'd prefer the show stay.

no (4.00 / 1)
cable does not have the same rules as broadcast TV.  he is running and he is staying on his TV show.

[ Parent ]
I hope Colbert skewers Teh Big Punkinhead ... (0.00 / 0)
like Stewart skewered Tweety two weeks ago

favorite son. (0.00 / 0)
an important thing to consider too is Colbert as kingmaker... say his candidacy totally takes off, if he picks up some delegates, he has a say in where those delgates go and who they vote for.

This would be very helpful at, say... a brokered convention.

Plus, he might be able to get people out to vote who otherwise wouldn't.

-C.


I Am DEFINITELY Down With This--Run! Stephan! Run! (0.00 / 0)
I am a great believer in satire in elections.  I grew up in the Bay Area, and satire had a long tradition in the city elections there.  Radio pranksters Coyle and Sharpe ran a bear for mayor once, name of Harrison J. Kodiak. 

I was obviously inspired by their example when I ran my imaginary writer persona, Timothy Klops, a black, gay, Jewish atheist, for cheerleader in the 19665-66 schoolyear.  He didn't win, but he didn't come in dead last, either.  Made a damn respectable showing for someone who never even went to a single game.  Next year, the younger brother of a former student body president--who was Mormon--followed my example, but actually ran himself for cheerleader.  And this wasn't like Yale, where they had male cheerleaders, because they didn't have girls.  This was an all-American highschool where guys running for cheerleader was so unthinkable that they didn't even have a rule to stop us from doing it.

Point is, this really changed things in my high school.  All sorts of people who had never even spoken a word to me had their mental boundaries permanently expanded by what I did.  And then expanded again by when Greg ran for cheerleader the next year. 


meanest (4.00 / 1)
My most flamed post ever on MyDD was when I wrote that Colbert had far surpassed Stewart in June, 2006.  I also called Stewart a hack, which is probably why I was flamed.

Stewart is the hardest-hitting interviewer on TV (4.00 / 3)

And no, I am not damning Stewart with faint praise.  He absolutely shines whenever he manages to get a conservative on his show.  Within just the last month or so, he has put sharper questions to Bill Kristol, Stephen Hayes, and Lynne Cheney than any Serious interviewer on TV ever has.

Colbert is a genius.  Stewart is closer to an everyman -- or at least his persona is.  I don't know their relative ratings, but I suspect Colbert appeals to a narrower audience more intensely, Stewart to a wider audience but less so.  In any case, they are both turning young people into Democrats faster than Republicans can breed replacements.  All hail BOTH of them!

-- TP 


[ Parent ]
I'll vote for him (0.00 / 0)
If Obama doesn't need the vote by then I'll vote for him.

I suspect he will do better in the Republican primary rather than the democratic one.  To me the most interesting thing about it is how his run could affect the Republican primary because South Carolina is a kingmaker the way Iowa is to democrats.


2.5! 2.5! 2.5! (4.00 / 2)
Little commented on in Colbert's announcement was the fact he mentioned that if he wins 2.5% of the vote he gets a delegate.  Consider how priceless it would be to have Colbert himself, for example, reporting from inside the SC delegation.

Satire/Serious (0.00 / 0)
The satirical spoof seems to turn to a serious political strategy (as if it weren't all along).

Play-acting at politics and reporting, somehow, gets closer to the core of those human endeavors than the "true" members of those professions. Perhaps they have been play-acting all along?

A barb is a barb and the over-taut balloon facade that shields this political "system" is ripe. 


Where are the strong - in whom I have trusted?


Dems require 15% (0.00 / 0)
I think the Democratic rules require 15% to win any delegates.  The GOPs have their own rules, so maybe 2.5% works for them (though I doubt it, since they're usually top-down, not bottom-up)...

The Republican Adultery Party (0.00 / 0)
The statement made by Katon Dawson, chairman of the South Carolina state Republican Party, is a hoot.

"My advice," he said in an interview, "is that he could probably have more fun buying a sports car and getting a girlfriend."

Colbert has been happily married for 17 years and has three children. He is a practicing Roman Catholic and teaches Sunday school.

Katon Dawson suggests that Colbert would have "more fun" by engaging in adultery, threatening his marriage and betraying his core religious beliefs. This sort of moral bankruptcy is of course perfectly in character for a modern Republican Party state chairman.

It's time for Dawson to resign!


Why Not Colbert? | 19 comments

© Open Left 2007

Sign Up To Fight The Bush Dogs

Join the Bush Dogs Campaign

What is a Bush Dog Democrat

Donate to the Bush Dogs Campaign

Open Left Video Wall
Al Franken Thanks Blue Majority

FCC Commissioner Michael Copps on Pearl Jam, Net Neutrality


Rep. Solis on Global Warming and Race


Alaska Democratic Candidate Jake Metcalfe


Senator Durbin Comes to Open Left


Ben Scott Update on iPhone Hearings


Bush's Video Blog on Scooter Libby

Freepress Lobbyist Ben Scott on iPhone Politics
George Miller Answers Matt Stoller's Iraq Question

Other Great Videos
Rep. Markey Films from the Chair's Seat

Fox Attacks Global Warming

If you're confused by net neutrality, here's video by Public Knowledge explaining it. About 300,000 people have watched this, so it's very good.
Donate to Open Left

Campaigns Residual Forces
Bush Dogs
Living Liberally
Nomination At A Glance
Net Neutrality
Blue Majority

Premium Ads

Standard Ads


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Liberal Institutions
Bush Dogs
State Blogs
Search




Advanced Search


Design by Politics by Design, Powered by: SoapBlox