In Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, author Douglas Hofstadter introduces many wondrous things. (It is, after all, he said, "a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines in the spirit of Lewis Carroll".) One of those is the "smart-stupid", a computer that can be as smart or as stupid as the programmer wants it to be. This is, of course, modelled on the piano-forte (piano to you), which literally means "soft-loud".
Although he doesn't use the terminology, in today's Salon, Robert Reich deftly explains why Obama's proposed new business tax cuts are somewhat similar. Or rather, he explains how Obama, in proposing them, is being both smart and stupid at the same time--a pattern that goes even farther than Reich himself describes.
Unfortunately, just as loud drowns out soft, so, too, stupid drowns out smart.
Background first:
President Obama reportedly will propose two big corporate tax cuts this week.
One would expand and make permanent the research and experimentation tax credit, at a cost of about $100 billion over the next ten years. The other would allow companies to write off 100 percent of their new investments in plant and equipment between now and the end of 2011 at a cost next year of substantially more than $100 billion (but a ten-year cost of about $30 billion since those write-offs wouldn't be taken over the longer-term).
Then the stupid:
The reason businesses aren't investing in new plant and equipment has nothing to do with the cost of capital. It's because they don't need the additional capacity. There isn't enough demand for their goods and services to justify it. Consumers aren't buying because they're trying to come out from under a huge debt load, including mortgage debt; they have to start saving because their nest eggs are worth substantially less; and they've lost or are worried about losing jobs and pay.
In any event, small businesses don't have enough profits against which to use these tax credits and deductions, and large corporations are sitting on over a trillion dollars of profits and don't need them.
Then the really stupid:
Republicans and corporate lobbyists have been demanding tax cuts on corporate investments for one reason: Big corporations are investing in automated equipment, robotics, numerically-controlled machine tools, and software. These investments are designed to boost profits by permanently replacing workers and cutting payrolls. The tax breaks Obama is proposing would make such investments all the more profitable.
In sum, Obama's proposed corporate tax cuts (1) won't generate more jobs because they don't put any cash in worker's pockets (as would, for example, exempting the first $20,000 of income from the payroll tax and making up the difference by applying the payroll tax to incomes over $250,000); (2) will subsidize companies to cut even more jobs; and (3) will cost $130 billion - money that could better be spent helping states and locales avoid laying off thousands of teachers, fire fighters, and police.
Then the smart:
So why is Obama proposing them? To put Republicans in a bind. If they refuse to go along he can justifiably say they have no agenda other than obstruction. After all, the only thing they've been arguing for is lower taxes. On the other hand, if Republicans agree to support these corporate tax cuts, Obama can claim a legislative victory that will help Democrats neutralize their opponents in the upcoming elections.
The proposals also make it harder for Republicans to argue the Bush income tax cuts should be extended for the richest 3 percent of taxpayers because small businesses need it. Obama's corporate tax cuts would appear to do the trick.
The White House probably figures even if Republicans agree to the proposed tax cuts, nothing will come of it. Congress will be in session for only about two weeks between now and the midterm elections so it's doubtful these proposals would be enacted in any event.
Then more stupid:
But this cynical exercise could backfire if Republicans call Obama's bluff and demand the corporate tax cuts be put on a fast track and get signed into legislation before the midterms.
More troubling, Obama's whopping proposed corporate tax cuts help legitimize the supply-side dogma that the economy's biggest obstacle to growth is the cost of capital, rather than the plight of ordinary working people.
So, that's Robert Reich's rundown of the smart-stupid score sheet. And I have to say that from where I sit, the stupid totally overwhelms the smart, as it almost invariably must. But that's not the end of it by any means. There's more...
At the same time Obama is busy playing this smart-stupid game, he's out campaigning trying to rev up the demoralized Democratic base, using oppositional rhetoric whose credibility is totally undermined by his smart-stupid strategy:
Smart-stupid:
From a stage at the Summerfest grounds in Maier Festival Park, Obama spoke animatedly as he described the GOP as the party of "No We Can't," contrasting that with his campaign slogan from 2008, "Yes We Can." He said Republicans disagree with everything he says. "If I said the sky is blue, they'd say no," Obama said. "If I said fish live in the sea, they'd say no."
In the midst of the speech, the president said he was proposing a $50-billion program to jump-start job creation and to rebuild the crumbling infrastructure of the United States. The plan includes the rebuilding of 150,000 miles of road, 4,000 miles of railroad tracks and 150 miles of runways.
"I want America to have the best infrastructure in the world," Obama said. "We used to have the best infrastructure. We can make it happen again."
....
The bulk of Obama's speech was focused on taking on Republicans and their criticism of the Obama administration. He mentioned Wall Street reform, health care reform and the overhaul of the student loan programs, adding this about the GOP: "They're not happy with it, but it was the right thing to do."
And he vowed that he would fight efforts to privatize Social Security. "To those who may still run for office planning to privatize Social Security," he said, "let me be clear: It will not happen on my watch. Not while I'm president of the United States of America."
Obama described the U.S. economy as a car that had been driven into a ditch by Republicans during the administration of George W. Bush. The president said working people had struggled to pull the car out of the ditch, only to have the Republicans ask for the keys back. "I don't want to give them the keys back," Obama said. "They don't know how to drive."
So if they don't know how to drive, how come he's copying so many of their moves?
