What Should We Expect From A Democratic Trifecta?

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 14:33



If Democrats win the White House, and expand their Senate majority to, say, 56 or 57 seats, what sort of legislative policies should we expect to pass under a Democratic trifecta? In addition to policies proposed by the Presidential candidates, I think we can find clues in the legislation that has currently been either vetoed by Bush, or defeated in the Senate by a cloture vote even though a majority was in favor of the legislation. Considering that a lot of people are disgruntled and discouraged right now, it is a reasonable question to investigate. After all, we do need to know what it is we are fighting for on the electoral front.

First, here are the bills that Bush has vetoed, and which so far have not been overturned:

  1. H.R. 1591, U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007. Override attempt failed in House, 222-203 (284 needed). A later version of the bill that excluded certain aspects of the initial legislation that the President disapproved of, H.R. 2206, was enacted as Pub.L. 110-28 with the President's approval.

  2. June 20, 2007: Vetoed S. 5, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007.

  3. October 3, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 976, Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 ("SCHIP"). Override attempt failed in House, 273-156 (286 votes needed).

  4. November 13, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 3043, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008.

OK, so without question a trifecta would result in at least 100,000 to 130,000 of the 160,000 or so American troops in Iraq being withdrawn in about one year. It would also result in an expansion of S-Chip and medical research utilizing stem cells. Several major government agencies would also be funded in different ways. Now, here are the successful filibusters where six more Democrats would be enough to break a filibuster (I left out "sense of the Senate" resolutions):

  1. October 24th, S 2205: A bill to authorize the cancellation of removal and adjustment of status of certain alien students who are long-term United States residents and who entered the United States as children, and for other purposes.
  2. September 19th, Specter amendment to HR 1585: To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States.
  3. September 18th, S 1257: A bill to provide the District of Columbia a voting seat and the State of Utah an additional seat in the House of Representatives.
  4. July 11th, Webb amendment to HR 1585: To specify minimum periods between deployment of units and members of the Armed Forces for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.
  5. April 18th, S 3: A bill to amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fair prescription drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries.
  6. With eight new Senators, which is a long-shot but not impossible, we also get the employee free choice act, which is one of those holy grail type positive feedback loops for progressives and Democrats. With seven Senators, we get the Intelligence authorization act.

In addition to the legislation already listed above on stem cells, S-Chip, Iraq and spending on government agencies, include voting rights for DC, a restoration of habeas corpus, increased troop readiness, and lower prescription drug prices under Medicare, and some minor immigration reform centered on students. Tack on a couple more Senators, and we also get

Outside of what has been vetoed and filibustered, there are other things to expect. First, we won't have to deal with any more cabinet and judicial appointments from Bush, and the new President will instead get to make his or her own. Second, there will be no conservative signing statements to what Congress does pass. Third, and perhaps most importantly, there will be the legislative initiatives proposed by the new President on key issues such as energy / global warming, communications / net neutrality, health care and education. How likely those are to pass with between 41-44 and Republican Senators is impossible to say in a general sense. However, most of them probably would pass, given that at least Arlen Specter and Olympia Snow will still be in the Senate no matter what.

So, basically, that is what to expect under a Democratic trifecta. I am not at all confident that the energy and health care plans will go far enough to solve the major problems we face, and I am also not confident that we will get total withdrawal from Iraq, but what is done in these areas should at least be steps in the right direction. We will probably still have FISA struggles, trade struggles, and immigration struggles that will not be resolved even under the trifecta. And there will be other problems too, which for one reason or another are not coming to mind right now. But, now that you can see what you should expect, hopefully it at least is easier to make up your mind on how hard you want to work on elections for the next year or so. It is always good to know what you are getting involved with, and I hope that this description helps advance that end.

Chris Bowers :: What Should We Expect From A Democratic Trifecta?
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So... (0.00 / 0)
I hope DSCC is recruiting for South Carolina and Nebraska... because we are going to need as many Senate pick ups as we can get... and it wouldn't hurt of Mike Moore would run in Mississippi.

What we can do (0.00 / 0)
There are a lot of things that a President with a neutral Congress can do outside of your list because, frankly, with the 60 Rule in the Senate and the corporate Democrats not much will get through with 55 to 57 Democrats in the Senate and 240 or so in the House.  This would include:

Naming pro-regulation people to the Regulatory bodies like the SEC. the FERC, the FCC, the FTC.  Regulators who believe regulation in itself is evil give a green light to the worst possible abuses.

Name pro-growth, pro-employment people to the Fed instead of the inflation is the worst possible evil and trample the economy to get it to 2% crew that the Republicans always use.  Do not re-appoint the same jerks because you do not want to rattle business.  The corporates have rattled far too many people to deserve this "courtesy."  It's our turn, baby.

Restore some of the old definitions such that unemploymnet is a meaningful statistic (those out of work) and is not 5% no matter what because a varying number of "discouraged" workers disguises what is going on.  Also inflation has been changed to get lower results.  Government statistics should be consistent and meaningful.  Changing them for political gain was one of the very worst sins of the Reagan era.

Restore the National Park system.  It should not be a source of cheap logging and degradation of our national treasures.

Investigate corporate fraud from government contractors.  I mean the big guys, the Blackwaters and Halliburtons not the mom and pops.

Restore funding to the IRS and SEC to regularly audit corporate taxes instead of once every three years or less.  Do we really want to give Exxon Mobil that much leeway? 


Restoring the Constitution (4.00 / 2)
Do you really think that the next Congress will take actions to restore the Constitution?  I tend to think not, that Cheney has actually won, and that there might be some lip service but the next President will seize those reins with relish and Congress won't stop her/him.

sPh


Reversing the Unitary Executive (0.00 / 0)
should be a prime goal of any Democratic "trifecta".  I don't think that the US Congress can do this on their own - they'll need a sitting President to repudiate the myriad mechanisms that Cheney has pushed forward to extend and strengthen the powers of the executive.

Which Democratic candidate is willing to fore-swear the use of any signing statements?  And why would they hesitate to make such a pledge?

Which is willing to promise to seek a Declaration of War should they face such a situation during their administration?

Which is willing to not only publically and in writing refute the Bush Doctrine of Pre-Emptive Warfare, but to offer a true alternative viewpoint, based on international cooperation and  institutions?

 

McCain Has a Republican Healthcare Plan for the 21st Century


[ Parent ]
Of course, the six to eight new senators (0.00 / 0)
need to not be ben nelsons or ken salazars in order to change things on controversial votes.

Actually (4.00 / 1)
They all voted fine on the specific bills listed above. The only defection was Baucus on #2 in the filibuster list. Otherwise, it was 100% Democratic unity.

These are slam dunk Democratic issues. Even our worst Senators vote for them.

John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion

[ Parent ]
I pretty much agree (0.00 / 0)
From the 110th bills you list, we're looking at something like Eisenhower Plus in a trifecta 111th - which, I think, is about right.

And, when it comes to those legislative initiatives proposed by the new President that you mention, I share your cautious approach: the members of the 111th will be on average more liberal than those of the 110th, but I can't see corporate influence being much diminished.

The existing culture of caution will likely be reinforced by the fact that the Dems will have retained control of both houses through a busy doing nothing much strategy, and the leaderships and old bulls will dish out more of the same.

I'm doubtful about those signing statements, though - Bush didn't invent the device, and there's enough legal backup (in the Chevron Doctrine, for instance) to make them just too hard to give up.

A trifecta is a rare thing (or has been in the last forty years), so the fact that the reasonable expectations of a Dem trifecta taking office in 09 are so modest is some indication of the tough row that lefties have to hoe over the medium term.

It'll certainly be a test of maturity for the lefty sphere.


GLBT rights (0.00 / 0)
Adding ENDA to the list, which Bush will veto if/when it passes the Senate.

And while I don't think he's going to veto the defense authorization bill because it has an amendment to extend hate crimes protections to LGBT individuals, there's always that possibility.

John McCain's solution: Don't get sick.


Donate to Open Left
ELECTION 2008 Presidential Forecast
Senate Forecast
House Forecast
PREMIUM AD

ADVERTISEMENTS



MENU

OpenLeft in your inbox!

 

Or, subscribe to each author individually.

OPTIMIZE MCCAIN About
Tips
McCain
John McCain
QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

OPENLEFT VIDEO WALL
Donna Edwards Thanks OpenLeft


Russ Feingold on the New FISA Legislation


Jon Conyers on Impeachment


Al Franken Thanks Blue Majority


FCC Commissioner Michael Copps on Pearl Jam, Net Neutrality


Darcy Burner on the FISA Legislation

More OpenLeft video...