Better Democrats: Open Left's Act Blue Page

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 19:30


Whenever a newly elected Democrat turns out to be a disappointment on a key vote, media messaging, or other campaign, there is a long-standing, knee-jerk response. In such situations, some variation of "well, I suppose you would rather have a Republican in that seat instead," is often brought up to quell dissent and keep the troops in line.

However, in Congress, there are now more than more than enough Democrats instead of Republicans to form a majority. To be precise, there are 236 Democrats in the House in seats that could otherwise be held by Republicans, and 49 Democrats in the Senate (plus two others who caucus with Democrats). Further, all indications are that in November, these majorities will grow substantially, providing Democrats will clear majorities in both branches of Congress of such size that Republican opposition could be rendered inert. In this situation, we are past the point of needing more Democrats in Congress. Now, unless we want a repeat of FISA and Iraq on virtually every issue, even under a vast Democratic trifecta, we have to work to make sure that we elect better Democrats.

It is with this principle in mind that today Open Left is introducing its first multi-candidate Act Blue page, simple entitled Better Democrats. In 2008, progressives do not have to, and should not, work to just elect any and all Democrats in every district across the country. Instead, we need to focus our efforts on those candidates who will be strong progressive voices in Congress, whose victories will help define the 2008 elections as a progressive victory, and whose victories will help ensure a long-term Democratic majority for years--maybe decades--to come.

Starting with our first seven candidates, Better Democrats will endorse those candidates whose victory, in our best estimation, will have the largest progressive impact on Congress as a whole. While there is no single criteria for our first seven candidates, there are several important factors we took into consideration. Endorsing The Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq helps. Being from a blue district that will be easier to defend helps. Also, being a woman and / or a minority helps, given that the vast majority of conservative in the Democratic Congress are white men. Even though it is a generalization and not a hard rule, electing more women and minority Democrats to Congress means electing more progressives. Further, Willingness to speak out against Democratic capitulation on issues like Iraq and FISA helps. Yet further, running a primary campaign against a conservative Democratic in Congress really helps. The candidates who most closely match these criteria will end up on the Better Democrats page.

Our first seven candidates are:

  1. Donna Edwards, the newest member of Congress from Maryland's 4th Congressional district. In February, Representative Edwards defeated incumbent Al Wynn in the Democratic primary, but she will surely face strong, more conservative competition in 2010.

  2. Darcy Burner, Democratic nominee from Washington's 8th Congressional district. Darcy is a long-time netroots favorite, even a blogger herself, and hails from a very winnable, very blue district. She is also the organizer of the Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq.

  3. Jeff Merkley, Speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives. After a hard fought primary that was waged largely online, not only is Merkley from a blue state, but he is the only Senate nominee to endorse the Responsible Plan.

  4. Regina Thomas, State Senator from Georgia, who is challenging Bush Dog John Barrow in the July 15th Democratic primary for Georgia's 12th congressional district.

  5. Sam Bennett, Eric Massa and Tom Perriello, who are respectively running in the lean-blue Pennsylvania 15th, the lean-red New York 29th and the reddish Virginia 5th. All three were among the original ten endorsees of the Responsible Plan. Not only will they be a step up from the Republicans who currently hold those seats, but they will also be a step up from the many Democrats who capitulated to Bush on FISA and Iraq last week.

More candidates will be added as time goes on, but for now we will start with these seven. Dollar for dollar, you won't find seven candidates who will create more progressive change for your money than these. Make progress happen--give today.

Chris Bowers :: Better Democrats: Open Left's Act Blue Page
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
2 candidates missing? (0.00 / 0)
You mention 7 candidates, but I only see 5 listed above.

I need to read better (0.00 / 0)
Oops.  3 candidates listed as #5.  Duh.

[ Parent ]
Uh (0.00 / 0)
under 5. he lists three candidates.

So that makes 7.

Great news!

I would add Debbie Cook to that list but for starters that is a pretty solid list. Glad to see Thomas and Perriello on there!

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


[ Parent ]
slightly confused over Regina Thomas (4.00 / 1)
Stoller the other day commented at length that Regina Thomas was not worth fundraising for. That giving her money was pointless. Now, I'm all for this, but you know, I'm like paying attention and everything and I don't get how first Obama is criticized for not supporting Thomas, then Thomas is criticized for not being able to run a campaign (thus making her seem like a total waste of time), then Thomas places 4th on the list of best campaigns to support. So, again, I'm really very into this and very into selective targeting to make the most of limited resources, but I'm rather confused by what's up with Thomas.

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

Huh? (0.00 / 0)
He nailed Christine Jennings pretty hard but was rather supportive of Thomas as I recall.

John McCain opposes the GI Bill.

[ Parent ]
Here (0.00 / 0)
If we want to help her win then she needs cash. Period.

No, she doesn't.  She doesn't believe in doing direct mail or TV.  She doesn't believe in fundraising.  She isn't going to run a modern campaign even if she gets the cash.  That isn't to say that things can't be done, it's just that it's going to take time and effort to do it for her outside of her campaign.

http://www.openleft.com/showCo...

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


[ Parent ]
any thought about nonfederal races? (0.00 / 0)
Like state governments, city governments, county, etc.?  I know there are a zillion local blogs, and that's exactly the problem.  Without going to each and every one of them, there's no way to know who's running, who's good, who isn't, etc.  Given that local people can work their way up to federal races, it would be great to have some sort of coordinated way to know about them and to grow our own.

I know I'm the first of many to suggest someone (0.00 / 0)
but NM-01, Martin Heinrich.  He's a great progressive in a district that has never gone Democratic -- even though the district has more Dems than GOP voters.

Also, his opponent, Darren White, is a huge supporter of Bush.

-New Mexico politics from the local perspective.


Exactly what I wanted (4.00 / 1)
I wanted some replacement for giving money to the DCCC & DSCC, i.e. some systematic way to support all the good Democrats in Congress, Democrats serious about universal health care, ending the Iraq war, etc. Can't give more than a little at the moment, but even a little helps, if enough people do it.  

Donate to Open Left
ELECTION 2008 Presidential Forecast
Senate Forecast
PREMIUM AD

ADVERTISEMENTS



MENU

OpenLeft in your inbox!

 

Or, subscribe to each author individually.

OPTIMIZE MCCAIN About
Tips
McCain
John McCain
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

OPENLEFT VIDEO WALL
Donna Edwards Thanks OpenLeft


Russ Feingold on the New FISA Legislation


Jon Conyers on Impeachment


Al Franken Thanks Blue Majority


FCC Commissioner Michael Copps on Pearl Jam, Net Neutrality


Darcy Burner on the FISA Legislation

More OpenLeft video...