End This Fed (David Kaib)
"Something new is happening around the contours of monetary policy."  Stoller, in a tour de force. Read the whole thing, but here is a taste, on the changed institutional context facilitated by blogs:

Institutionally, the environment has changed for the Fed and its traditional allies. Whereas at the beginning of the financial panic in 2007-2008, the Fed was a sole provider of expertise and credibility on finance to the political class, by 2010, the new financial blogosphere destroyed the Fed's mythic stature. It is common for staffers to get more and better information from blogs, and for hearings to be driven by the conversation online, than from the Congressional liaison group at the Fed. Read this remarkable Q&A; between Ben Bernanke and Senator Bunning during Bernanke's confirmation hearing, which was a series of questions inserted into the record, questions largely drawn from bloggers. The public has changed its appetite as well. This YouTube clip of Elizabeth Coleman, the Inspector General of the Fed, was my boss's most successful hearing appearance, and possibly the most consequential hearing put on YouTube, ever. [here]

Making this institution, and the policy areas it controls, political is a radical (and necessary) move.  "Of the many castle walls the Fed used to keep the rabble out, secrecy and complexity were critical."  The basic progressive vision is that government should serve the needs of all of us - it's time to think hard about what that means.  

The Fed is the only 'progressive' operator on the national economic stage
...and that wouldn't be possible if the Fed were 'politicized.'

By progressive, I mean the Fed is actually trying to do something about unemployment (though Bernanke is begging Congress to help him), and seems to understand we need to target the main part of our efforts to the demand side right now.

What Matt says appeals to me as a progressive ("a new cadre of publicly-minded policy-makers and regulators"), but I don't think any of what I mentioned above would be possible if the Fed were 'politicized,' given the hegemonic tyranny of right-wing ideology right now.

Matt also says:

We must also begin to internalize the new forces of openness and rethink how a monetary system can function in an internet-enabled society.

With net neutrality crumbling before our eyes, I don't think we can count on that either. Someday soon perhaps, the powers that be will just turn off the spigot on Julian Assange and that will be that.

The MSM has tagged Independents the party of swing-voting 'centrism.' If Democrats no longer represent your liberal values, show America there is still a Left by registering for another left-aligned party.


I'm not sure I agree that the Fed is
trying to address unemployment - Bernake is beginning to say some of the right things, but that hasn't translated into much policy (and he waited to start making this case until Congress was far less likely to act).

By "political," I mean 'an object of contention,' a situation which "a new cadre of publicly-minded policy-makers and regulators" can help create. The only way to fight back against a hegemonic ideology is to contend against it.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
The QE II effort
of buying $600 billion in bonds is meant to stimulate demand, so that is something, and I think it's significant in that the Fed is doig it and has taken a lot of criticism for it.

I don't agree that the Fed is the seat of hegemoic rightwing ideology - a nest of elite conservatives yes, but not the death-pact ideologues of the current Republican party. I'm amenable to opening it up to reform if there were (at least) a political balance of forces, but there's not. As with the deficit-reduction commission, I'm certain it would turn into a hard-right ideological trojan horse.

It was intentionally set up to be outside politics and we have to acknowledge that it appears to have worked the way it was intended: it staved off a depression and is now taking some action to address unemployment without regard to winger bullying.

The MSM has tagged Independents the party of swing-voting 'centrism.' If Democrats no longer represent your liberal values, show America there is still a Left by registering for another left-aligned party.


[ Parent ]
Or, it could be that
the QE II effort is designed to funnel another $90 billion in fees to Wall Street.

[ Parent ]
Bernanke's Role
It's also true Bernanke has to represent all factions at the Fed in some fashion. There are progressive policy makers at the Fed and more than a few troglodytes. Bernanke can't take a pure progressive or conservative position without upsetting factions and, in turn, limiting his policy options. My take, mostly from reading Paul Krugman, is that Bernanke is on the side of the progressives in terms of his instincts and area of expertise.

I second your observation about the risks of politicizing the Fed. It's more a case that the Fed needs to be more transparent and, as Stoller points out, more in tune with how stakeholders (the public included) get information.


[ Parent ]




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS