The other big political news today: email fundraising overkill

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Mar 31, 2010 at 17:14


Today is the end of the first fundraising quarter for candidates for federal office. By April 15th, all candidates for federal office, as well as all federal PACs, have to disclose how much cash they have on hand, how much they raised from January 1st through March 31st, and what expenditures they made.

In an attempt to make themselves appear more viable to party committees, to media outlets, and to other donors, candidates try to rack up as many donations as possible on the last day of the quarter.  With email now such an essential part of campaign fundraising to a huge deluge of political fundraising emails today.  For some perspective, at 1:30 p.m. Today, eastern, Brandon English tweeted that he had already received 53 email fundraising asks today:

Now 53 end-of-quarter emails in my inbox today. Most popular subject lines are "Midnight" and "X hours to go". Give to your fav Dems today!

Now, Brandon works on new media for the DCCC, so he might be on more of these candidate email lists than anyone in the country.  He also clearly isn't bothered by the deluge.

However, with literally hundreds of campaigns sending out fundraising emails today, and with many campaigns selling their email lists to other campaigns as a means of paying off campaign debt after elections are over, the signal to noise ratio for online organizers is reaching a disturbing level.  I have donated to about 25 different federal campaigns since 2003,  mostly in small amounts, and as a result I have received dozens of emails over the past week.  Instead of reading them, these days I am pretty much just deleting them all.

While most campaigns will still make far more money over email today than they made any other day this year, the possibility of a long-term, chronic decline seems real.  As more campaigns sell their lists to each other, and as campaign email lists grow larger, the usefulness of email as an activism tool can only decline on an email per email basis.  And then, as individual emails become less valuable, campaign email lists might grow even larger, as they become cheaper to purchase.

Email remains at the center of new media political organizing for now, but days like today are a reminder that won't be the case forever.  Eventually, social networking will replace email, since social networking groups cannot be sold and since it is much easier for an individual to choose which groups they join.  This probably doesn't spell danger for large, email-based activism organizations over the next few years, but in a decade, or perhaps a little more, the declining value of email will make the basic structure of online political activism completely different than it is now.

Chris Bowers :: The other big political news today: email fundraising overkill

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
the other thing is (4.00 / 3)
I get a lot of snail mail, basically from almost everyone I ever gave a donation to, plus some more who bought or were given the address. (I blame a donation to Daschle for that. Yeah, brought it on myself).  

I don't read the e-mails, but this is even worse because someone is wasting real money for postage.


New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.


i hate those (0.00 / 0)
especially the "special personal message from Big Dem Cheese X" that don't mention the DSCC until you get to the reply card.

for the national committee mailings, i have taken to returning the postage-paid envelopes if they have one, with a note saying "you're kidding me." i wish there was some kind of "No Paper" registry but i can't imagine that ever happening (until the Post Office goes completely private and postage jumps %3000 but that's another story...)

not everything worth doing is profitable. not everything profitable is worth doing.


[ Parent ]
Don't donate to my campaign today. (4.00 / 1)
I don't care about filing deadlines, your dollar spends the same no matter when I receive it.



This is a Test of the Emergency Free Speech System. This is only a Test. In an actual Free Speech Emergency, I'll be locked up.


testimonial (4.00 / 1)
The dollar I donated to your campaign is the best campaign donation I've ever made.

I'm certain, percentage-wise, it's the most impact I've ever had on a candidate's finances. I fully intend to remind you of that after you are in office, too. ;-)

They call me Clem, Clem Guttata. Come visit wild, wonderful West Virginia Blue


[ Parent ]
Send in your contributions today (4.00 / 2)
and help the Democratic Party expand offshore drilling. Californians worried that your might lose out on this great opportunity - never fear - we are saving that for Obama's second term.

Obama will not issue an executive order banning drilling off the West Coast or in U.S. Northeast waters, but those areas won't be considered in the next five-year drilling plan, the official said.

That will still allow future presidents, if they chose, to develop energy resources in those offshore areas, the official said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36...



The OFA, DSCC and DCCC emails are ridiculous and simple-minded fluff pieces for Democratic Party hackery (4.00 / 3)
I'm hanging on to my subscriptions because I want to see how they react to and spin the whacking we're gonna get in November.  I'll probably unsubscribe sometime after that.

Sad to say, PDA emails are also usually pretty useless.  They usually tell me about some event that I'm not going to.  Occasionally a good one talking about an actual candidate comes along.

The only emails from actual groups that are consistently interesting are DFA and PCCC ones.


gmail filters are your friend (0.00 / 0)
I have a gmail filter that flags any email with the word "campaign" in it as political. In addition, the first or second time I get a political fund-raising email from the same source, I create a new filter and send their stuff to that same folder.

I just checked and I've gotten 39 emails in that folder so far today including one with the subject line "Too many emails today?"

They call me Clem, Clem Guttata. Come visit wild, wonderful West Virginia Blue


contribution brokers? (0.00 / 0)
groups like Better Democrats are already providing something like this - going out to find candidates worth backing from a particular political point of view. but the contributions still come from us individually - which puts us on the lists of each of those candidates, thus guaranteeing an explosion of follow-on mail (electro and snail).

what would be handy, for lazy people like me, would be to just sign up for a monthly amount with one group, saying "here, here's the money, use it wisely". the bundled contributions are then handed out to this year's models, who never get my name.

would that even be legal?

beyond the value of simplifying things for the donors, it seems like it'd also give a bit more clout to the donation. particularly with a subscription model. dollars in hand, and dollars to come, not just sales leads that maybe might turn into contributions if you bang on them.

not everything worth doing is profitable. not everything profitable is worth doing.


Not to mention all the Fwd: Did you see this? (0.00 / 0)
Emails I get of emails I've already seen today.

22 (0.00 / 0)
I just counted 22 I got today alone.  And that's just at home.  My office e-mail probably has 15-20 too.  of course, I get the same ones each place and multiples of the same ones at each place.  No one even bothers sorting out duplicate addresses.

That's just today.  I expect I average 10 per day otherwise.  I just love the "almost to our goal"  and "12 more hours" crap, as is that should inspire me.  Really--I'm supposed to be fired up by some arbitrary "goal" of on-line donations?

At least it is not hurting the environment.  Still, it is a shame that the deluge and phoniness is so extreme that the whole concept of on-line solicitations is loosing impact.    


I really doubt this: (0.00 / 0)
"the usefulness of email as an activism tool can only decline on an email per email basis"

With direct mail, which has been around a lot longer, the usefulness has been extended through the ability to segment based on past behavior. Direct mail practitioners have had to do this because of the rising costs of postage and paper. Right now, the downward pressure imposed by rising costs does not exist for email. Email is still so relatively cheap that you can tolerate an extremely low response rate and still get decent ROI. That of course will change as lists grow stale and more channels, such as social media, siphon off live donors. So what the smart email practitioners are already learning how to do is segment lists so they are sending to the audiences most likely to respond. Of course, the smart emailiers don't tend to work for political campaigns. They tend to work for for-profit businesses.





USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS