Wall Street reform to go on the road; replay of health reform townhalls in the works?

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Jun 30, 2010 at 12:03


President Obama is giving a speech on the economy today in Wisconsin.  Conveniently, is the home state of the lone Democratic Senator, Russ Feingold, who has vowed to block the Wall Street reform bill (Washington's Maria Cantwell is undecided).  This trip is reminiscent  of President Obama's visit to Ohio late in the health reform fight, a trip which played a role in persuading Representative Dennis Kucinich to vote in favor of that bill.

Don't expect any political pressure to move Feingold, however, given his long track record of taking iconoclastic positions.  Feingold voted against using military force in the Balkans and Iraq, declined DSCC "soft money" in his 1998 re-election campaign, voted against 1999 financial deregulation, was lone vote against the Patriot Act in 2001, first Senator to propose a withdrawal timeline from Iraq in 2005, introduced a censure measure on Bush in 2006, voted against TARP in both October 2008 and January 2009, etc.  Even if I do not approve of Feingold's actions on the Wall Street reform bill, his overall record is truly inspiring.

While the trip to Wisconsin may be just a coincidence, it could also be the start of a two week long fight over final passage of the conference committee report on the Wall Street reform bill.  Continued demurring from a number of Senators (most notably Scott Brown), combined with memorial services for Senator Robert Byrd, has all but guaranteed that the Wall Street reform fight will continue over the July recess.   Those are the signals coming from top Democrats, too:

As much as Senate Democrats wanted to pass their Wall Street reform bill by the end of the week, the death of Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) Monday morning made that almost impossible. Byrd will lie in state in the Capitol for most of tomorrow, and senators will spend much of Friday at a ceremony in West Virginia, eating up a great amount of the week's remaining Senate floor time. As early as yesterday morning, Senate Whip Dick Durbin told reporters it would be difficult to finish up the bill before July 4, and last night after the conference committee adjourned, legislators suggested very strongly that the vote in the Senate would have to wait.

The House of Representatives is expected to pass the conference report today.  When Congress returns on Monday, July 12th, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will most likely file for cloture on the conference report.  This will set up a vote on either Tuesday, July 13th, or Wednesday, July 14th.  This makes for an intervening period of at least 13 days when opponents of the bill will try to get three of the following five Senators to vote no on cloture: Scott Brown, Maria Cantwell, Susan Collins, Charles Grassley and Olympia Snowe.  With Robert Byrd's replacement likely to be sworn in before the vote, Democrats will also need three of those five in order to reach cloture, and send the bill to President Obama's desk later in the week.

So, it's a two week fight, and the terms are best three out of five.  We should be able to win this, but there is recent precedent for Democratic members of Congress getting scared by right-wing turnout at townhalls.  As I said in the post just below this, it ain't over 'till it's over.

Chris Bowers :: Wall Street reform to go on the road; replay of health reform townhalls in the works?

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I suppose Feingold deserves the denefit of the doubt (0.00 / 0)
But I notice that all the "iconoclastic" positions you note above were positions generally shared by progressives. His opposition in the current case breaks that trend.

I further notice that he is up for re-election this year, and that having done a favor for the big banks may not be the worst thing for his re-election campaign, from a financial point of view.


Actually (4.00 / 3)
his position -- opposition to TBTF; wanting top prevent another crisis -- used to be shared by all progressives and even Obama, prior to the debate in Congress, which was hijacked by Wall Street lobbyists. At that point, as if by magic, it became "un-practical" to break up the banks or, more generally, to do enough to prevent another crisis. Real reform was within reach until Obama decided he didn't want it to be:

http://baselinescenario.com/20...

Geithner's team spent much of its time during the debate over the Senate bill helping Senate Banking Committee chair Chris Dodd kill off or modify amendments being offered by more-progressive Democrats. A good example was Bernie Sanders's measure to audit the Fed, which the administration played a key role in getting the senator from Vermont to tone down. Another was the Brown-Kaufman Amendment, which became a cause célèbre among lefty reformers such as former IMF economist Simon Johnson. "If enacted, Brown-Kaufman would have broken up the six biggest banks in America," says the senior Treasury official. 'If we'd been for it, it probably would have happened. But we weren't, so it didn't'."

That's one passage from John Heileman's juicy article in New York Magazine. It provides a lot of background support for what many of us have been thinking for a while: the administration is happy with the financial reform bill roughly as it turned out, and it got there by taking up an anti-Wall Street tone (e.g., the Volcker Rule), riding a wave of populist anger to the point where the bill was sure of passing, and then quietly pruning back its most far-reaching components.

So all Feingold is done is cling to a position that used to be held by all progressives: the silly belief that Congress should try to prevent another meltdown. I suppose you can attack his "purity," if that's the way you roll, but there's no reason to question his sincerity, and it'd be kinda nice if progressives reserved at least as much disdain for the pol who put real reform out of reach.



[ Parent ]
Remember The [State of] Maine! (4.00 / 1)
No. Not so much, apparently.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3





USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS