Wow, France… Why can't we do that here?!??

by: Jonathan Smucker

Thu Oct 21, 2010 at 18:00


Also posted at BeyondtheChoir.org

Do you ever look at newspaper articles about worker and student strikes in countries like France or Greece or Argentina-you know, the kind of activity that shuts down the whole country-and think to yourself, "Holy shit, that's what I'm talkin' about!  Those people know how to protest!?"

Well, I sure do.

Not to glorify any particular tactic for it's own sake, but geez, the spirit of collective action and common purpose that's displayed in those moments-let alone the negotiating power it awards to grassroots movements, unions, and progressive political parties-is something that sometimes, um, feels a little lacking here in the good old U.S. of A.

So what are you waiting for.  Go ahead.  Try that here.  See how many people you can turn out.  See where it gets you.

Likely.  not.  very.  far.

We have a situation here.  We're stuck in a Catch 22.  As a society, we presently seem to be inoculated against the means necessary for our own collective advancement. (If you're at the top of the plutocratic order, now's the time to congratulate yourself on a brilliant system.)  And I'm not talking about any one particular style of collective action or protest - we're not France or Greece or Argentina, and I don't particularly want us to be.  I'm fully ready to embrace an all-American style, and I would settle for whatever kind of collective action (within ethical and strategic limits) powerful enough to challenge entrenched power and privilege.  Is that such a tall order?

What do I mean, we're "inoculated?"

I'm glad you asked.  Have you ever heard someone say something like, "I'm not an activist or anything," or they look at you like you're from Crazy-ville (or they simply don't engage) when you start talking about the protest you went to?

Think about the word protest for a minute.  Seriously.  Stop.  And think about it.  Notice.  What comes to mind with the word?  Now try it with the word activist.

Jonathan Smucker :: Wow, France… Why can't we do that here?!??
Okay, how long did it take for "the 60s" to come to mind?  And from there, how long did it take before you started seeing images of Woodstock, tie-dye, hippies, marijuana, free love, or Days of Rage?  Or let's go more contemporary - did you picture black-clad, masked anarchists smashing a Starbucks window, or, alternatively, a small group of older, white Quakers standing vigil to oppose (yet another) war?

If you're like most Americans, you have many of these associations burned deep into your neural pathways.  If you're reading this, you're likely among an audience that also holds a lot of positive associations with protest and activism - thankfully, many Americans do.  But still, you know the story.  You know... the story of the dirty stinking hippie going through a communist phase until you graduate from college (and if it lasts much longer everyone wonders when you're going to grow up and get a real job) - ring a bell?  You know how protest and activism have been negatively branded in our culture.

Americans today tend to be uniquely skeptical of collective action that challenges power-for multiple fascinating historically rooted reasons that are beyond the scope of this post-compared to our counterparts in most advanced "democratic societies."  And the past four decades have been especially rough on grassroots progressive movements; following the social upheavals that culminated in "the 60s," conservative activists retrenched to build and very effectively amplify a coherent, overarching values-based narrative, while the most activisty of progressives have largely self-segregated into single-issue advocacy efforts (or cross-issue, but micro-identity-based and/or counter-cultural activist scenes) that lack a coherent, overarching values-based narrative that resonates beyond the borders of our self-selecting bubbles.

Conservatives claimed a monopoly on the flag, the Constitution, the Bible, and the whole story of America - language and symbols that hold a whole lot of meaning for a large majority in our country.  And at least some on our side conceded these symbols, essentially saying, fine, you can have 'em!  In the flag we saw genocide, slavery, conquest, and war.  In the church we saw historic justifications for sexism, racism, poverty, and all sorts of bigotry; an "opiate of the people."  (Nevermind the central role that churches played in the Civil Rights Movement, the Abolitionist Movement, and countless other social justice struggles.)

In reality, most progressive-minded Americans haven't forsaken their identity with these common and still powerful symbols.  But reality isn't the only thing we're dealing with here.  We have also to deal with perceptions of reality - specifically, a hegemonic conservative narrative that says that progressives have abandoned (and are attacking!) sacred American values.  (So what if there aren't any actual real-life protesters spitting on soldiers when they come home - doesn't it just sound true?)

So back to inoculation.  Here's how it works.  To inoculate someone against a virus, you introduce a very weak strand of the virus that triggers the body's immune system to kick in.  Based on this exposure, the body builds up antibodies against the weak strand.  Then anything and everything that comes along remotely resembling that weak strand, well-BOOM!!-IMMUNITY!!!  Now the host has a built-in resistance to the real virus.

And here's how it works in politics and culture.  The hegemonic conservative narrative-with all its supporting resources, infrastructure, and echo chambers-introduces into popular consciousness an exaggerated picture of progressive collective action (aka activism).  Picture the most over-the-top crazy stupid dirty stinking hippie latte-drinking un-American communist window-smashing flag-burning Kumbaya-singing event you can imagine.  This caricature of a stereotype is the metaphorical weak strand that is exaggerated in order to inoculate against the real thing.  Then when an opening for powerful collective action comes along, well-BOOM!!-IMMUNITY!!!  All those negative associations come to mind and most people recoil out of revulsion or fear of the associations.  They now have a built-in resistance to your commie virus.

This conservative hegemonic strategy of inoculation preys upon the way the human brain has evolved to function.  More on that, and some ideas about what we can do about it-I promise, this isn't just a cynical rant!-to follow.  Stay tuned...

More like this at BeyondtheChoir.org


Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Now this ios what I'm talkin' about, (4.00 / 3)
we need amny more articles like this, and possibly a symposium on how to arrange the de-inoculation of citizens from being activists for their democracy.

MORE!!!

Thanks Jonathan


more coming... (0.00 / 0)
Thanks.  I'm working on an organizing field guide, actually.  I'll be posting articles and snippets here and at my blog BeyondtheChoir.org.  

Would love any feedback, stories that illustrate the points, and suggestions for related reading and inquiry.

Cheers!

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience


[ Parent ]
it started happening four years ago :) (4.00 / 2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...

thanks for the great post :)


indeed! (4.00 / 1)
I think we have a lot to learn from the burgeoning immigration struggle (I'm considering spending most of next year in Arizona doing just that.)

Thanks!

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience


[ Parent ]
Well done! (4.00 / 3)
(The ghost of Gramsci smiles contentedly)

Crank it up!

"Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; .... The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. " -- Frederick Douglass


The obvious target would be Manhattan (4.00 / 3)
If one wanted some sort of strike/demonstration to shut things down and make a point.  It's economically significant with a limited number of ways in and out.  It's relatively compact.  It has a high utilization of public transportation.  

Collective action intended to shut things down probably works best when you have a lot of people dependent on mass transit because it is comparatively easy to disrupt as opposed to other measures one might take.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


these actions are called manifestations in french not demos (0.00 / 0)
I like that a lot. It speaks to the natural nature of them, to the fact that if you push, there is push back; if you attack there is defense, you lower wages, you get anger manifesting.

NY would a great place to begin modeling American public actions, the manifestation of American democracy.
In fact, I think picking an area, making it the teaching place, beginning to show all Americans hat getting out and making demands is part of being a citizen.

I contend the biggest inoculation is the black block, which is why they arew filled with police agent provocateurs, no one wants to go to a manifestation, a demo, if assholes are going to turn over taco stands and break windows.


[ Parent ]
I think a bigger innoculation is that (4.00 / 2)
you never see the mlk like civil disobedience anymore. Sitins, boycotts, blockaids and general strikes.  If the demonstration is just for show and inconveninces no one it doesn't work.  The french are creating an oil shortage to cost business money.

My blog  

[ Parent ]
well new york has a subway workers strike a few years ago (0.00 / 0)
That had an economic impact on the city.  Apparently doormen at buildings also almost went on strike recently http://www.reuters.com/article...  Even the anti-war demonstration in 2003 had more than a bit of that to it, because the mayor decided not to give a permit, and we showed up anyway and in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in new york :) (doesn't sound like much, but it showed what can happen with large numbers of people willing to obey unjust orders :).  

there's critical mass (in a lot of places) where cyclists take up the road, which is useful.  There's also sit-ins etc at universities from time to time around the country, and there are the 'weapons of the weak' actions that a lot of people take (slow downs, sick days, etc.)

and before 2001 there were the world bank and imf demos, the demonstration in seattle that was pretty transformative (mainly because the police overreached, which seems to be a trend for me ;), etc.

The point in the post about long term messaging and what paul said the other day about progressive media infrastructure as a priority is crucial to those things, because without the progressive media infrastructure, all of those people will be politically suppressed and branded as criminals, psychos, dangerous, violent (i.e. terrorist), etc.  thereby allowing not just them, but anyone who might sympathize with them, to be crushed.


[ Parent ]
He''s been saying that for a long time (0.00 / 0)
it is kind of repetitive without any concrete moves toward doing it.

My blog  

[ Parent ]
i thought about this a lot when i lived in new york (0.00 / 0)
it's not as ideal as it seems.  Manhattan at least.  It's been thoroughly gentrified and ethnicity based organisations and organised labor rarely work together.  In addition to that, it's driven by the DC-New York nexus and, more relevantly, money and established opinion!

I'd suggest San Francisco, Eugene, Madison Wisconsin, Berkeley, New Haven CT, or somewhere like that.  But generally speaking, I think the farther you go (socially) from New York-Washington, the easier it's going to be to create something new. :)


[ Parent ]
I agree (0.00 / 0)
look at how conservative new york dems are.  Owing to real estate prices their just aren't that many classic working class people their or within 300 miles of new york.

My blog  

[ Parent ]
mass hacking (4.00 / 1)
I do not have the technical expertise to hack anything, but I wonder if there is some way to do the cyberspace equivalent of mass civil disobedience - something that could maybe crash TBTF bank stocks or something. Lots of progressive activists and union people probably have online brokerage accounts. Wouldn't want to do anything illegal, but financial markets seem to be chock full of dirty tricks that are legal. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure out how to make some of these tricks work for us instead of always working against us.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
the system can recover from sabotage (0.00 / 0)
It's tempting to try to think up silver bullet tactics that would carry out some vigilante justice against the banking system or whatever, but without broad-base visible expression of people mobilized behind a different values system, where does it get us?  The powerful can recover quite easily from one surgical attack.  They have a harder time when there is an unpredictable and escalating trajectory of political punches coming at them from all different directions.  For that to happen, you need a popular movement.  There aren't shortcuts.  We're not going to think up some genius silver bullet tactic that magically gets us the goods using only the kinetic forces we have already in motion now.  We have to set more people into motion.

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience

[ Parent ]
One reason people don't get involved (0.00 / 0)
is because they can't see results from their individual actions. A small investor based strategic fund could provide more tangible and gratifying results for small donations if you can pool enough of them to use strategically to cause some real mischief and target some of the worst culprits. Could set more people in motion. Get Michael Moore on it.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
. (0.00 / 0)
Why not just join al quaeda? I think they have similar goals to you in bringing down the system so to say.

[ Parent ]
Because I'm not a murderer. (4.00 / 2)
Thanks for the completely BS false equivalence. What do you think strikes and civil disobedience are for? Was the civil rights movement just like Al Queda? Ever heard of boycotts?

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
"bringing down the system" (4.00 / 1)
The part of the system that I would hope you would agree that needs to be "brought down" or at least weakened is the part where giant corporations are above the law and control our government, making our "democracy" effectively a plutocracy. If you do not agree with that, you are a conservative. If you do agree, then according to your own logic, you should join Al Queda.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
"we want our democracy back" (4.00 / 1)
no question the plutocracy has to be brought down. how about "we want our democracy back" as a slogan?

ps. one can see from the body of your post that you don't advocate anything illegal ("cyberspace equivalent of mass civil disobedience", "Wouldn't want to do anything illegal").


[ Parent ]
In comparison we seem like... (4.00 / 2)
...sheep being lead to the slaughter.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. - FDR


Can't Resist (4.00 / 1)
Your version:

And here's how it works in politics and culture.  The hegemonic conservative narrative-with all its supporting resources, infrastructure, and echo chambers-introduces into popular consciousness an exaggerated picture of progressive collective action (aka activism).  Picture the most over-the-top crazy stupid dirty stinking hippie latte-drinking un-American communist window-smashing flag-burning Kumbaya-singing event you can imagine.  This caricature of a stereotype is the metaphorical weak strand that is exaggerated in order to inoculate against the real thing.  Then when an opening for powerful collective action comes along, well-BOOM!!-IMMUNITY!!!  All those negative associations come to mind and most people recoil out of revulsion or fear of the associations.  They now have a built-in resistance to your commie virus.

Our version:

And here's how it works in politics and culture.  The hegemonic progressive narrative-with all its supporting resources, infrastructure, and echo chambers-introduces into popular consciousness an exaggerated picture of conservative beliefs.  Picture the most over-the-top money crazed greed head Lloyd Blankfein who is a nice guy to family and friends who also is quite happy tens of millions are unemployed and they're being kicked out of their homes because of Lloyd as long as Lloyd gets his millions. Lloyd is a sociopath who literally will sell his country down the river to make a buck.  This caricature of a stereotype is the metaphorical weak strand that is exaggerated in order to inoculate against the real thing.  Then when an opening for powerful plutocratic greedy takeover comes along, well-BOOM!!-IMMUNITY!!!  All those negative associations come to mind and most people recoil out of revulsion or fear of the associations.  They now have a built-in resistance to your conservative virus.

The negatives of selfish greed are so obvious, and destroy the lives of so many tens of millions while degrading all our lives, that it should be easy to innoculate people against conservative greed. Indeed, one simple thing is to point up the greed heads while also pointing up the millions of people in our history who have sacrificed their lives (Dorothy Day comes to mind). People can't have role models if those models never appear in their history books and the media.


"The hegemonic progressive narrative"??? (0.00 / 0)
You do know what hegemonic means, right?

The hegemonic progressive narrative-with all its supporting resources, infrastructure, and echo chambers

How about a strategy centered on unicorns?

miasmo.com


[ Parent ]
Hegemony: leadership, predominance (0.00 / 0)
There are a few definitions for hegemony, including dominance of one nation over others.  Another definition is simply leadership and predominance.

I think TSlavin is right on to suggest that we need to think hegemonically as progressives.  We need to be projecting our values as commonsense and as the norm, and not think like people who are up against the culture.  We are the culture.  We need to label the greedy bankers as the antisocial deviants whose values are way out of step with the values of most Americans.

Progressive hegemony?  Yes, please.

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience


[ Parent ]
that begs the question 'whose values' :) (4.00 / 1)
This is why I prefer recognizing that hegemony exists, and that you'll have to engage in it, but at the same time trying to figure out how to dismantle the tools that allow it to exist.  

In my opinion, one important part of this is to make sure that the people in whose interests progressives want to speak are actually increasing directing the progressive movement - people most affected by issues of class, racism, sexism, citizenship (including people outside the united states!), disability discrimination, police brutality, political suppression, etc.

That way, whatever movement emerges may have as a first principle that its democratic as well as left-leaning.  so progressive populist (social democratic)  it will be relevant and more powerful as time goes on (my opinion).
 


[ Parent ]
but if you're saying... (4.00 / 2)
...that we are presently lacking in the Department of Progressive Hegemony, then yes, I agree.

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience

[ Parent ]
yes! inoculation is a tool that we should use too (0.00 / 0)
And I like you're example.  The complicated part is how to make our message hegemonic.

beyondthechoir.org - because social justice is intended for a broad audience

[ Parent ]
That was my point (4.00 / 1)
A progressive message and a conservative message have equal value. Both can be demonized. Both can be celebrated and pushed. The only difference is that for four or five decades conservatives have done a better job pushing their message, celebrating their message of unbridled greed at the expense of the vast majority of Americans, while progressives have not even tried. But conservatives also had successes in their early years. Progressives can, too. Conservatives didn't have to wait for Reagan.

What struck me about your example, Jonathan, is that it is so easily adapted to a progressive point of view. It's a rhetorical template.


[ Parent ]
Strikes (4.00 / 1)
Don't forget:  Sarkozy is the right-winger.  If a right wing politician in the US tried to cut Social Security, people might--MIGHT--protest.  When Obama does it, however, millions of his defenders will excuse it away--it's 11 dimensional chess, change takes time, don't let perfect be enemy of good, etc etc etc ad nauseum.

Protests (4.00 / 1)
Well, we would have great mass-participation protests if we (a) emphasized economic and fiscal issues, instead of the foreign policy, social/cultural, and rights issues that the left in this country always does; (b) appeal to the great middle-income groups, workers and farmers as well as the middle class; and (c) propose some constructive change that benefits everyone, instead of hateful and counterproductive nemes.

Maybe the early 20th century, rather than the 60's and 70's, should be looked at.  


A march for jobs? (0.00 / 0)
Stop outsourcing. Trade agreements written by workers and not corporate lobbyists. Put people to work rebuilding our infrastructure. Aid to state and local government to save the jobs of teachers, firefighters, cops, etc.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS