deniers

Why the right denies anthropogenic climate change

by: Daniel De Groot

Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 12:30

Digby, Amanda Marcotte and Krugman traded thoughts recently on what exactly it is about climate science that so sets off the right in opposition.

It's an important question.  The right, while opposed to environmentalism in most regards, could in past at least see what side of the bread is buttered.  The Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer, after all, was negotiated and ratified in the era of Reagan, Thatcher and even in Canada, Mulroney.  Thatcher herself was an early believer in the need for concerted action to address Climate Change.  Why (aside from her education in chemistry) is she basically alone on this?  I like Krugman's answer the best of the three, but even so I think he comes up short, particularly on the anti-intellectualism angle.

What's really happening is that anthropogenic climate change is a fundamental assault on right wing ideology and the solution requires a worldwide implementation of liberal policies that will undercut right wing ideas at every level well into the future.  Right wingers maybe do not grasp this fear consciously, but intuitively everything about this issue stinks for them.  Denial is the only way to save their worldview.

There's More... :: (28 Comments, 689 words in story)

Skeptical about Skeptics? Check this out ...

by: a siegel

Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 14:50

Being skeptical about Global Warming skeptics' arguments has proven, to date, to be a healthy and sensible way to deal with their truthiness claims and arguments.  The Heartland Institute's distribution of a list of scientist supposedly doubting Global Warming yet again verifies the value of being skeptical about Global Warming skeptics.

DeSmogBlog decided to take a look at Heartland's list: emailing the scientists to ask them about the situation. From 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares:

  • The Heartland "article purports to list scientists whose work contradicts the overwhelming scientific agreement that human-induced climate change is endangering the world as we know it."
  • "DeSmogBlog ... emailed 122 of the scientists ... calling their attention to the list."
  • "in less than 24 hours - three dozen of those scientists had responded in outrage, denying that their research supports Avery's conclusions and demanding that their names be removed."

Hmmm, maybe Heartland should change the title from 500 scientists to 464 scientists maybe have documented doubts of man-made global warming scares until, of course, they are asked whether they agree with this article's assertion.
There's More... :: (0 Comments, 175 words in story)
Donate to Open Left










Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search