supermajority rule

36 State Senates preclude the possibility of filibuster

by: Daniel De Groot

Mon Mar 15, 2010 at 18:30

If the filibuster is such an important anti-majority/tyranny tool, why do two-thirds of the State legislatures not allow it?


Filibuster Possible (13) No Filibuster (36)
Alabama Arizona
Alaska California
Arkansas Colorado
Connecticut Georgia
Florida Illinois
Hawaii Indiana
Idaho Iowa
Maine Kansas
Nebraska Kentucky
South Carolina Louisiana
Texas Maryland
Utah Massachusetts
Vermont Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Some comments on this table inside.

There's More... :: (8 Comments, 1092 words in story)

Crowdsourcing Request: State Senate filibuster rules

by: Daniel De Groot

Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 11:00

I need your help.  Which states can be governed by a simple majority?  If the current US Senate rules are so great, you'd expect them to be replicated in lots of States right?  And if any state does dare entrust its governance to the tyranny of the bi-cameral legislature, with their penchant for spending less on redistribution, well we should expect those states to be doing very poorly right, what with all the crazy laws and socialism they will have.

It turns out this is surprisingly hard to answer.  The National Conference of State Legislatures produces items like this and this which highlight the complexity of this topic.  I started out reading various State senate rules but states like California, with its two-thirds budget requirement mean that majority rule isn't as simple as the absence of a filibuster.

Inside I will try and lay out an approach to answer this.

There's More... :: (36 Comments, 398 words in story)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox