The Empire Struck Back- with a vengeance

by: Mike Lux

Wed Nov 03, 2010 at 13:30


I have that Han-Solo-encased-in-carbonite feeling this morning. The powers that be in modern America- the insurance industry, big oil and coal companies, most of all the big Wall Street banks that control 60% of our country’s wealth- had gotten used to having everything go exactly their way in Washington. They had come to expect that they would write the laws, and then get to rewrite them if something happened to make the original law inoperative. They were used to politicians say “yes, sir” and “what hoop do you want me to jump through now, sir.” And when a new group of politicians came to town that wouldn’t say yes to every single demand, that stood up to them some of the time, they hit back hard- very hard. And they won this round.

Our elections were awash in big business money this year, and it went overwhelmingly to the Republicans. We don’t even know for sure which industries gave the most to the Republican slush fund that the Chamber of Commerce has become, or to the new ones set up by folks like Karl Rove, because they don’t have to disclose their donors. But we do that these corporate front groups played almost exclusively for the Republicans, and that the direct contributions to candidates and party committees shifted dramatically toward them as well. Given the Democratic control of both Houses and the White House, this kind of giving shift is unheard of, since usually corporations give to the party in power. But because Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and Congressional Democrats had stood up to insurers on pre-existing conditions, had stood up to the energy giants on pushing for climate change, and had stood up to Wall Street on the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and some other new regulations, these corporate leaders were pissed and looking for blood. The fact that the Democrats had unfortunately made major concessions to these corporate interests on things like the public option and breaking up the big banks didn’t mollify them at all: they were still loaded for bear and ready to pull the trigger.

So they funded the tea party uprising, and they funded Republican candidates, and they funded secretive groups to run attack ads. It worked, for two simple reasons. The first is that middle-class swing voters are mad at everyone in Washington. They think both parties have failed them, that neither party cares about them, and they are happy to send a message to whichever party is in power- as they have three elections in a row- that they will keep voting out those in charge until something changes to make them think that government works again. The second is that the voters most hurt by this terrible economic crisis the Bush presidency handed to us are precisely the voters most open to voting for Democrats: young people, working class women, blacks, Hispanics. Getting hammered as hard as they have been economically put them in no mood to come out to vote.

Democrats’ fate was probably sealed when the same Wall Street bankers who wrecked the economy and who we had to bail out were still giving themselves hundreds of millions in bonuses while the rest of the economy continued to tank. It was the ultimate insult, and it fed the idea that our system is only working for the fat cats but has stopped working for ordinary folks. As long as the economy stayed as bad it did, voters were not going to be convinced that Obama had brought the change he had promised.

What now? Democrats have a choice. They can cower in fear at all the corporate money that will be thrown against them, and backpedal on everything that would actually help working families get out of the bind that they are in. Or they can be determined fighters for jobs, a stronger economy, and cleaning up special interest corruption in Washington. Having rejected both parties so thoroughly in the last 3 elections, Americans will be looking in 2012 to figure out who will be truly fighting for them in the years to come.

Mike Lux :: The Empire Struck Back- with a vengeance

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"when a new group of politicians came to town that wouldn't say yes to every single demand" (4.00 / 7)
when did this happen? AHIP wrote the health care bill before Baucus even had it out of committee

Democrats’ fate was probably sealed when the same Wall Street bankers who wrecked the economy and who we had to bail out were still giving themselves hundreds of millions in bonuses while the rest of the economy continued to tank.

Meanwhile at Goldman Sachs Presents: the Department of Treasury™…


 
Yeah, but you've got to admit… (0.00 / 0)
Post Citizens United, all the big money proved what they really want.  You might not see a difference between Democrats and Republicans, but billionaires sure do.

[ Parent ]  
Well, it's a way of (4.00 / 1)
building a wall. Corporate Power, for all its arrogance, is worried about the populist wave both on the right and the left. By flipping out at every little vaguely anti-Wall Street thing that Dems doe and by generally portraying him as anti-business, they make actual populist policies seem “unreasonable.”  

[ Parent ]  
all it proves is that Obama can't even keep his co-conspirators in line (4.00 / 4)
he got rolled on the public option, 100%, and punished for not hugging the Chamber hard enough

apparently if you go 100% carrots and 0% sticks, this is what you get

also a lesson the unions and many progressives could stand to take to heart


[ Parent ]  
It should be liberating for Dems (4.00 / 8)
The should say, Corporate Power acted as though we were populist even though we kissed its ass, so we might as well be actually populist instead of just a little less corporate than the GOP.

No doubt they’ll draw the exact opposite lesson.  


 
re: leson (4.00 / 2)
No doubt they’ll draw the exact opposite lesson.

but can they? now that big business can spend as it likes, can a rightward by the dems shift really do anything? the dems won’t be able to out-whore the republicrats.

maybe they will try to be the same as the republicrats in hopes of getting some of the cash, but won’t that sooner or later kill the party?


[ Parent ]  
Yes. Obama can! He's already backpeddaling. (4.00 / 2)
Obama signals he’ll allow rich to keep tax cuts, kill chance of climate bill

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/201…

The rethuglicans haven’t really started the new round of hostilities in Congress yet, and the effing postpartisan president is already compromising. Same “strategy” as with healthcare reform. Obviously, the fool hasn’t learned anything!


[ Parent ]  
re: learn (0.00 / 0)
yes, no doubt they can try

to be more clear, by ‘can they shift right?’ I mean ‘can they shift right and accomplish anything politically?’


[ Parent ]  
Obama can govern exactly as John McCain or Mitt Romney would (4.00 / 1)
and still count on ignorant Democrats to back him up.  Hell, he passed Mitt Romney’s health care bill and it was hailed as historic legislation on par with Medicare (as if!).

If any of us dirty liberals dare call him out on his un-liberal ways, we’ll be branded as Republican sympathizers and run out of the party.


[ Parent ]  
Fascinating the change in tone! (4.00 / 4)
As I recall, Republican victory was the quick path to apocalypse and armageddon all in one.  (Rise strains of Battle Hymn of the Republic to waving-flag background.  Our ancestors died so we could vote Democrat today.)  Now we’re having relatively sane discussions of how to proceed.

The liberals are all talking confidently about how the Republicans are going to have trouble ruling, yadda, yadda, yadda.

So isn’t it clear that all the horror talk was a hype act to scare us into voting Democrat?

For the wheel’s still in spin And there’s no tellin’ who That it’s namin’. — Dylan


 
Either that… (4.00 / 5)
or you do the best with what you have at the moment.  Yesterday we had a vote.  It was important to do our best.  Today we have a new dynamic.

(Though one could argue I just agreed with you, eh?)


[ Parent ]  
Oh Mark! (0.00 / 0)
There you go, trying to be rational again!

When will you ever learn the wisdom of pure hysteria and wild accusation?

“You know what they say — those of us who fail history… doomed to repeat it in summer school.” — Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]  
Funny, I thought hell was supposed to be even scarier (0.00 / 0)
once you’re in it.

[ Parent ]  
The temperature rises slowly for the newly arrived. (0.00 / 0)
Not hot enough for ya yet? Just wait…

[ Parent ]  
the sad story – (4.00 / 1)
all ‘the horror talk’ didn’t work well enough and now America will be ruled by the riders of the apocalypse -(and a few dolphins) – but you might be right with the:
the ‘sane discussion’ a la: “Hi darling -I’m not a witch”!

[ Parent ]  
It will be close to "apocalypse and armageddon". (0.00 / 0)
Two years of even stronger selling out to corporate interests, with massive cuts a la UK and exactly NO legislation that will benefit the majority of people. And this, in an urgent economic situation where people are the most vulnerable. Some here may think it’s a good idea to calm folks down, some others may think it’s no big deal, but in my opinion it will be quite close to “apocalypse and armageddon”.

So, sry, Jeff, but your effing sarcasm is totally unwarranted. If you thought the last two years were bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet.


[ Parent ]  
Very bad — and getting worse … (4.00 / 3)
is not even close to apocalypse and armageddon.  I’m aware of the danger in the wings.

But I seriously detest the hype.  Like crying wolf, it innoculates people, it numbs them, it renders them less able to fight.  We have enough real threats without some of the bullshit that was put out.

For the wheel’s still in spin And there’s no tellin’ who That it’s namin’. — Dylan


[ Parent ]  
who is not desting 'the hype' – (0.00 / 0)
I went through the sanity march and I’m aware – ‘these are hard times and not end times’!

[ Parent ]  
Duh, it was a hype act (4.00 / 2)
which is why I didn’t believe it, and said so.  I guess that makes me a Republican sympathizer.

[ Parent ]  
Whoa, hold on there Luke! (4.00 / 4)
The powers that be in modern America- the insurance industry, big oil and coal companies, most of all the big Wall Street banks that control 60% of our country’s wealth- had gotten used to having everything go exactly their way in Washington. They had come to expect that they would write the laws, and then get to rewrite them if something happened to make the original law inoperative. They were used to politicians say “yes, sir” and “what hoop do you want me to jump through now, sir.” And when a new group of politicians came to town that wouldn’t say yes to every single demand, that stood up to them some of the time, they hit back hard- very hard. And they won this round.

This is pure fantasy. A new group of politicians came in and wouldn’t say “yes” to every single demand? That’s laughable. Policy-wise almost nothing has changed. I’ll give the administration credit for reforming the student loan process, but that’s the only accomplishment they have. They stood up to an entrenched industry and said “no” to a monopoly protected by the public treasury. I guess ending one of the 1000 crony capitalist rigged industries deserves some praise, but let’s not insult the rebels in Star Wars by comparing them to Congress or the administration.  


 
Lost You Referents, I'm Afraid (4.00 / 3)
Mike was damn sure fighting like Luke & Hans, regardless of what Obama was doing.  And Obama was doing just enough of what Mike was up to to draw their retribution.

This is not a defense of Obama, by any means.  To the contrary, it shows the utter futility of thinking he could make deals with these guys, just by taking the most important things off the table even before the beginning.

“You know what they say — those of us who fail history… doomed to repeat it in summer school.” — Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]  
"Mike was damn sure fighting like Luke & Hans, regardless of what Obama was doing. " (0.00 / 0)
so little of this sentence makes sense

[ Parent ]  
So that's what standing up to Big Business was? (4.00 / 6)
I guess allowing the Health Insurance Industry to write their own “reform” bill was kind of like forcing Bart Simpson to write on the blackboard in detention after school.

And refusing to reinstate Glass-Steagle was kind of like sending your youngest up to bed without desert.

And we all saw the stern talking to that poor BP had to endure.

No wonder Big Business was so angry.


 
Democrats got what they asked for…. (4.00 / 5)
This was Obama’s fault.  He was elected to bring/fight for change, and all he did was bring back the worst of Bush and Bill Clinton.  He sold Harry Reid and all of us up the river on health care.  The reason Harry Reid looked so bad is that Obama was so busy bobbing and weaving, Reid had no clue what the hell Obama wanted.  As it turned out, Obama wanted a corporate welfare bill with no cost containments and mandates for every man, women and child to hand over their money.  

 
If you feel sorry for that spineless creature Reid…. (4.00 / 4)
…what about Pelosi??? She didn’t do anything wrong, and showed much more determination to get progressive bills passed than Reid and the crappy WH combined!

[ Parent ]  
Pelosi. (4.00 / 1)
Stupak!

For the wheel’s still in spin And there’s no tellin’ who That it’s namin’. — Dylan

[ Parent ]  
Your point is…? (0.00 / 0)
Are they related in any way?  

[ Parent ]  
House … (0.00 / 0)
… passed.

For the wheel’s still in spin And there’s no tellin’ who That it’s namin’. — Dylan

[ Parent ]  
Sure. Or else the numbers wouldn't have been there. (0.00 / 0)
That’s not Pelosi’s fault. She didn’t want that crap, she fought hard to pass better legislation, and she applied a lot of pressure on the Stupak traitors. What should she have done, really, let the bill fail after all the efforts? Don’t be ridiculous. More realism, pls.

[ Parent ]  
and if another idiot shows up here – (4.00 / 2)
who tries to imply there is no difference between Dems and Republicans or – they are all the same – I’m going to vote for a Dolphin too next time!

 
"Democrats have a choice." ?? (4.00 / 1)
Oh see, there you go again.  
Not happy with being kicked in the head again for the umpteenth time, you’re getting all hopey-changey on us by thinking Dems will suddenly arise from behind their desks and show some guts.

The real problem for good Congressional Dems since January 2009 is that the executive branch had/has a different agenda than our strongest leaders.
With Pelosi out and the Senate more useless than ever, Obama has already show he’s perfectly willing to do what the Right wants as long as he kowtows to a few Moderate Dems to help get him reelected in 2012.

Real Dems are now leaderless and locked in to being an obscure minority for some time to come.


Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


 
How much really spent. (0.00 / 0)
Which website is going to keep an eye on reports filed after the fact and organize and publish the actual amounts spent in this election?  If Feingold just did not get in the game when he had an opponent supported by a bunch of millions of dollars of outside spending, would that be worth noting? What comparison to the amounts spent by Harry Reid, John McCain, Patty Murray to save their seats in similarly sized states. What other lessons to be learned for future candidates on the waging of a competitive race will be missed if the numbers are forgotten? The newspapers may not publish such analysis anymore, but this is what the intertubes can do, right?

 
banks (4.00 / 3)
We did not “have to bail out the banks.”

This was the number one thing Obama did that lost him support:  bailing out Wall Street at the expense of Main Street.  

There were other solutions possible.  

The Tea Partiers whole originating ethos was their fury over bailouts.  And sure, that fury got manipulated and co-opted and used.  But the basic fury itself did not go away and the left continues to refuse to speak to that and instead reiterate that Obama had to bail out the banks to prevent catastrophe.  But that catastrophe already happened for millions of small businesses and for all the laid-off — and the sheer unfairness of it all sticks in the craw of the bankrupt and the foreclosed upon.  

No liberal should defend Obama’s actions in the financial crisis in any way shape or form.  It was the clearest and starkest choosing to side with the haves over the have nots I’ve seen in a very long time.

Ian is right; Chris Hedges is right:  if we don’t repudiate Obama for that reason alone, the left has lost all credibility as a champion of the people.


 
We Had To Bail Out The Banking SYSTEM (4.00 / 6)
We did not have to bail out individual banks.

Big difference.

FDR bailed out the banking system in 1933. He closed a shitload of banks in doing it.  

It worked.

“You know what they say — those of us who fail history… doomed to repeat it in summer school.” — Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]  
Yes! (0.00 / 0)
That’s so true, Paul, and so few are saying it.  

Educate, Agitate, Organize, Mobilize, Act!


[ Parent ]  
For the record (4.00 / 1)
Bush and the Fed bailed out the banks.  Obama never spent his portion of the Tarp, except a bit to bail out the auto industry and his unsuccessful HAMP program.  The vast bulk of the money was returned unspent.

That isn’t to say Obama is innocent in all this.  He did re-nominate Bernanke, for example.  But there is no reason to reinforce conservative talking points.


[ Parent ]  
But did Obama not vote for the bailout, (4.00 / 3)
when he was in the Senate? I thought I remembered everyone saying, “oh, he’s just doing that because he’s going to fix it later.”

Montani semper liberi

[ Parent ]  
Mark, don't you remember what happened? (4.00 / 2)
The whole TARP thing got stalled.  McCain wanted to suspend the campaign and cancel the debate to take care of it.  Obama said he could chew gum and walk at the same time.

Obama went to D.C. and sat at a table with the leadership and his campaign and the media credited him with getting TARP passed.  That was when he became defacto President and everyone started expecting him to tell us what to do.

TARP was as much an Obama thing as a Bush thing even though Bush signed the bill.  

Obama sure doesn’t act like TARP was a problem and Bush is to blame.  He has a talking point that TARP saved us and made us a profit.  He glories in it.

Educate, Agitate, Organize, Mobilize, Act!


[ Parent ]  
Yes, that is all true, but (4.00 / 2)
Obama also pushed hard to not have congress take his half away.  But it is also true that Bush spent his $350 billion and Obama did not spend his.

I’m never sure the degree I should push back on this kind of stuff, but I think it is important to stick to the truth.


[ Parent ]  
Always push back (4.00 / 1)
because sticking to the truth is important and we have to compare and contrast our memories and facts to assure we get it right.  

Educate, Agitate, Organize, Mobilize, Act!


[ Parent ]  
whipped (4.00 / 6)
The bailout legislation failed on the first go around.  Obama whipped for TARP.  When the Progressive Caucus held up the second round of TARP money, wanting strings attached, Obama threatened to primary them via OFA efforts.  These aren’t right-wing talking points.

Obama could have taken FDR’s route; he didn’t.  

You cannot be seen to side with Snidely Whiplash (or Jamie Dimon, such a “savvy businessman”) at a time of 17% real unemployment, when 13% of mortgages are in foreclosure and then claim to be on the side of the people.

And by the way “unsuccessful” is a very charitable term to use to describe the HAMP program.  Rapacious and fraudulent might be better ones.


[ Parent ]  
True, These Things All Happened (0.00 / 0)
And I was appalled by them.  Still, Obama wasn’t the initiator.  He stil could have turned back at several different points thereafter.  The wounds were self-inflicted, but it was a lot more drawn-out, a lot messier and more protracted.

I can almost see Detective Goren piecing together the psychodrama involved.

Criminal Intent, indeed.

“You know what they say — those of us who fail history… doomed to repeat it in summer school.” — Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]  
HAMP was Obama's baby (4.00 / 2)
“these things happened”, he says

[ Parent ]  
Per Yves Smith, February 2009 (4.00 / 5)
Now to get to the punch line, let us turn to the New York Times. The headline “Geithner Said to Have Prevailed on Bailout,” is already bad news, since as we have discussed, Geithner is a living, breathing example of cognitive regulatory capture. But here is the troubling bit:

   In the end, Mr. Geithner largely prevailed in opposing tougher conditions on financial institutions that were sought by presidential aides, including David Axelrod, a senior adviser to the president, according to administration and Congressional officials.

   Mr. Geithner, who will announce the broad outlines of the plan on Tuesday, successfully fought against more severe limits on executive pay for companies receiving government aid.

   He resisted those who wanted to dictate how banks would spend their rescue money. And he prevailed over top administration aides who wanted to replace bank executives and wipe out shareholders at institutions receiving aid.

   Because of the internal debate, some of the most contentious issues remain unresolved.

In other words, Geithner followed the Paulson script of pushing hard to make the bailout industry friendly, to the extent of compromising the effort to get the plan fleshed out in adequate detail.

No, he was not innocent in all this.


[ Parent ]  
so is Lux going to respond any of this? (0.00 / 0)
sayin’

 
But you enabled all of this! (0.00 / 0)
You are culpable!

The morons at Daily Kos are culpable with their unprincipled cheerleading!

YOU have to own this! The blackwaterdog and frontpagers at Daily Kos have to OWN this!

Only by a broadly based (read: left and right) populist movement can forestall a historical tragedy that will make Ragnarok look like a Tea Party (pun intended…).

YOU chose to spit on the libertarians! You chose to support corporate Dem Grayson over Rand Paul knowing that Rand Paul was going to win big!

Last night was the (first) harvest for that arrogance.

You want real change*? It can only come from a populist uprising on par with the American Revolution, or from a second Constitutional Convention.

* change for the better, fascists will be glad to bring change of a different sort…


 
"YOU chose to spit on the libertarians" (4.00 / 3)
with good reason

to quote Mark Ames

3. Anytime anyone says anything libertarian, spit on them. Libertarians are by definition enemies of the state: they are against promoting American citizens’ general welfare and against policies that create a perfect union. Like Communists before them, they are actively subverting the Constitution and the American Dream, and replacing it with a Kleptocratic Nightmare.

it’s a solid choice


[ Parent ]  
I think the Veal Pen is far more culpable (4.00 / 3)
There doesn’t seem to be any infrastructure (party, voting bloc, active coalition) for sheltering and growing a left/right populist movement. Thus, scaring people away from the Tea Party was not really a crime of major magnitude.

IMO, far more damaging was no effort to “make him do it”. Obama was caught stabbing us in the back re healthcare, but most of the American public doesn’t even know it. Such an effort could have been mobilized by progressives without any reference to Tea Baggers, libertarians, etc.; leveraging their outrage into simultaneously growing a pro-active movement. The so-called progressive leaders strike me as mostly moral cowards and sellouts. They’d have trouble leading anybody out of a paper bag.

Also, ito of the Tea Party, the bigger political sin was not not looking for allies, there, but for becoming hypnotized by a movement that one can’t identify with, yet not seeking to match it and, where antagonistic to progressive goals, provide a countervailing force. Ralph Nader made this point just yesterday on Democracy Now.

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]  




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS