The Heart of Darkness

by: Mike Lux

Tue Nov 23, 2010 at 13:30


I came across these stunning statistics in a Matt Taibbi piece the other day: the top 1% in our country has had its percentage of the nation’s wealth leap from 34.6% in 2007 to 37.1% in 2009, while the median net worth for an American household has gone from $102,500 in 2007 to $65,400 in 2009. Changes in numbers that dramatic in a two year period are astonishing, almost unfathomable. In the massive economic crisis we have just experienced, the home prices, savings, pensions/401(k) funds for the middle class took a beating like nothing most of us have seen in our lifetimes, while the top 1% have actually done okay after the initial hit on stock prices: corporate profits and stock prices are back up, corporate bonuses and dividends and executive compensation is in good shape, and the top 1% has more of the country’s wealth in its back pocket than it did before. We still have high unemployment and stagnant wages and a terrible housing market, but the guys at the top are floating along pretty well right now.

As I was writing that last paragraph, my eye was caught by this headline and story from today’s NYTimes:

Corporate Profits Were the Highest on Record Last Quarter

The nation’s workers may be struggling, but American companies just had their best quarter ever.

American businesses earned profits at an annual rate of $1.66 trillion in the third quarter, according to a Commerce Department report released Tuesday. That is the highest figure recorded since the government began keeping track over 60 years ago, at least in nominal or non-inflation-adjusted terms.

Corporate profits have been going gangbusters for a while. Since their cyclical low in the fourth quarter of 2008, profits have grown for seven consecutive quarters, at some of the fastest rates in history.

This story, those statistics from my opening paragraph, paint an incredible picture of an economy and country in bizarre juxtaposition: corporate profits at record levels, big banks quarterly bonuses and profits at record levels over the least couple of years, while the rest of the country in economic meltdown.

Democrats are still reeling from our political losses, and the DC political class is still obsessed with the re-positioning dance, but at the heart of everything else, at the center of everything that matters, are these bleak economic facts driving our politics. The sooner Democrats stop worrying about being center or left, and start focusing on how to get the middle class out of its economic black hole, the sooner our politics start getting fixed. Period. End of story. The heart of our political darkness is the heart of the middle class’ economic darkness.

Mike Lux :: The Heart of Darkness

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Economy (4.00 / 1)
If we would only give a few breaks to wealthy people and big corporations, they could start hiring again and bring down unemployment!

 
What is the Democratic Party plan to deal with the situation? (0.00 / 0)
Now that cutting back-room deals with Big Pharma, forcing people to buy health insurance form for profit corporations, and bailing out Big Banksters has been shown to be next to useless?

Oh, yeah….let the Bush Tax-cuts expire, soon….but not too soon….


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


 
"party"? "plan"? (0.00 / 0)
Aren’t those terms mutually exclusive?
|-(

[ Parent ]  
That's why I asked (4.00 / 1)


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Perhaps only if you mean political Party (0.00 / 0)
Otherwise, usually most of the best, most fun parties have a strong plan and/or vision.

Also, I’d say “plan” and “party” are not mutually exclusive on the Right. The Rethuglicans have had a strong, cohesive plan for decades, (see Paul’s posts about “hegemony”), and they’ve been steamrolling the hell out of us with it ever since.


[ Parent ]  
Good answer (0.00 / 0)
if you are talking to republicans and conservatives.

But my question was about the Democratic Party, liberals and progressives.

Paul does a great job describing how much better the right has been at waging hegemonic “warfare”, but is less forthcoming on the issue of how we can confront it on a time scale commensurate with the problems our nation faces.

Do we really have the luxury of waiting until some rich folks decide to set up left wing think tanks and provide us with an effective progressive media?


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Yeah, I was responding to Gray's comment, (4.00 / 2)
not attempting to answer your question.

In reply to your question, I can only say the fact that more and more people seem to understand we need to build a movement outside of the Party structures (and corporate funding!) gives me hope. The big question for me is this: how do we get all these different progressive groups and individuals that are really active and dedicated to find a way to start moving more in conjunction so we can get that movement going?


[ Parent ]  
I agree that some seems to agree on the need for a movement (0.00 / 0)
But the “Plan” usually seems to come apart on the issue of inside the Democratic Party or outside of it.

To the extent that OpenLeft represents the politically active left, it seems that in-fighting and arguments over who has a plan and who does not are just about what “we” can manage.

Not hopeful.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Yeah, I remember some of those at our shared apartment. (0.00 / 0)
Great times. One of the most successful ones was our Mexican party, after one of the girls I shared the apartment with came back from Mexico. However, damn, since I moved in the early naughts I somehow lost the appetite for big parties. It’s different when you have to organize this on your own. Hmm, any fun parties at your place recently?

[ Parent ]  
There was a recreation room (4.00 / 1)
at my last apartment in Oakland, and we had some pretty good parties in there. Sadly, I had to move away 2 years ago because I can no longer afford to live in my own hometown. Now I’m stuck in the middle of fucking Nowhere, CA, and no good parties at all.  

[ Parent ]  
We had a large hallway that was the main party area… (0.00 / 0)
…and our rooms where used for dance floor area, chill out zone, the buffet, etc. In best student tradition, beers and beverages were stored in cold water in the douche tub. Yeah, those were the times…

Now, cheer up, even in Nowhere, CA, there can be gr8 parties. You just need some party people to visit you. Hey, post an open invitation here and look who turns up!
😀


[ Parent ]  
The Democrats in DC can't (4.00 / 2)
and won’t save us. With all due respect, if we follow Mike’s advice we’ll be right back in the same spot 4 years, 8 years, 12 years down the road. We have to find a way to take our economy back from Wall Street and corporate rule ourselves.  

 
Actually (0.00 / 0)
I don’t read Mike’s post as giving any advice to us at all.  

Nor are you giving any.  I mean, what is this?  “Oh another article by Mike Lux.”  Time for another snarky slam.  You should at least read the article first, no?

sTiVo’s rule: Just because YOU “wouldn’t put it past ’em” doesn’t prove that THEY did it.


[ Parent ]  
The problem with Mike is that he still cares 2 much about the party (4.00 / 2)
And I mean the WHOLE party! But there are lots of assholes in it that don’t deserve to receive any support or help. As I see it, Progreessive should only care about Progressives. And USE the party as a vehicle to advance Progressive goals, nothing more. To hell with those to the right!  

[ Parent ]  
Asymmetrical warfare: Rock crushes scissors, scissors cuts paper, paper wraps rock–and message burns money. (4.00 / 3)

It’s time to stop acting bewildered by their duplicity and accept the fact that our “leaders” know exactly what they are doing.  The Democrats are caught in a lie, espousing the needs of one segment of society with “centrist” rhetoric, while actually serving the interests of another though legislation.  This is why Democrats are loosing.  Who would trust a prevaricating Democrat anyway?  

Given the costs of an election, for most Democratic candidates, it is not deemed possible or desirable to go up against the interests of the wealthy when they collide with the interests of the poor and middle class.  So Democratic leaders are indeed serving their constituency–the wealthy donors, who consider themselves “Democrats” but demand fealty to their economic interests.  

Republican or Democrat, the wealthy are buying a government that puts their interests first.  But, I should add that many of the Democratic donors, from their neo-liberal perspective, probably believe their interests are the same as all Americans.  But in reality, this is a dishonest relationship that prevents the left from overtly exposing the systematic attack on the poor and middle class.  

This class warfare has to be brought out into the open.  There is no possibility of resisting corporate money without a strong message.  We need a clear platform that asks the wealthy to carry their fair share of the load, recommits to a strong American infrastructure, and rebuilds the middle class.
We also need to see this as asymmetrical warfare.  I believe that in the end, a clear and honest message can counter the big dollars.


 
This analysis by Mike (4.00 / 2)
explains why all the commentary about how “stupid” it is for the Republicans to place politics over the good of the country is pointless.

It is true that the Republicans’ political strategy will continue and deepend the recession.  But that doesn’t mean they are stupid.  They are smart enough to realize that they will kill two birds with one stone:

1) The politics works and they will be able to blame the Democrats for the bad economy and win politically.

2) The bad economy will lead to their true objective, the wealthiest will be better off and own even more of the country.

Remember, it wasn’t the plutocrats jumping out of the windows in 1929; it was the mid level money managers.  The plutocrats did very well in the depression.

Educate, Agitate, Organize, Mobilize, Act!


 
"The heart of our political darkness is the heart of the middle class' economic darkness. " (0.00 / 0)
So is this site a DNC party organ or what?  Because as far as I can tell, the Left and the Democrats are mutually exclusive groups in this country.

Also, Mike, Matt Taibbi is posting ABOUT you, not TO you.


 
Two things (4.00 / 5)
Democrats are still reeling from our political losses, and the DC political class is still obsessed with the re-positioning dance, but at the heart of everything else, at the center of everything that matters, are these bleak economic facts driving our politics. The sooner Democrats stop worrying about being center or left, and start focusing on how to get the middle class out of its economic black hole, the sooner our politics start getting fixed. Period. End of story.

One, I object to the idea (or if you prefer, the rhetoric) that it’s the “middle class” we need to worry about, rather than “everyone other then the uber-opulent.”  Part of that means focusing on how to get the poor out of their deeper economic black whole. I’m not suggesting focusing on the poor over the middle class – I’m suggesting we are all in this together.  There can be no strong middle class with a sizable and growing impoverished class.  There can be no successful political coalition for the Democrats that only helps some of us.

Two, the only way to get out of the black hole (other than another bubble) is to fully fund liberal programs like unemployment insurance, food stamps, etc., raising taxes on the corporations and rich who hold all the wealth to ensure they pay their fair share, expanding social insurance, protecting labor rights to expand the power of workers, and industrial and trade policies that reinvigorate our manufacturing sector (preferably with green jobs that protect the environment, fight climate change and reduce the role of fossil fuels and the cartels that sell them). There is no way forward to addressing the economy that does not move left.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


 
nicely put (4.00 / 3)
There is no way forward to addressing the economy that does not move left.

If I did not already have a signature line that I liked this sentence from you would be in the running. A single sentence that encapsulates so much.



Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot ashes for trees? Hot air for a cool breeze? And cold comfort for change?


[ Parent ]  
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
I love the graphic.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]  
Good points, David! (0.00 / 0)
Even though I wouldn’t overinterprete Mike using “middle class”. Let’s not forget, there are lots of folks among the poor who were middle class not long ago, and who still feel that way, even though they are in very dire straits. However, right, being precise is important, and the strategy should be to care about the lower 98% and to show that to the public. Because those are the folks who won’t get anything of value from the rethugs!  

[ Parent ]  
Fair point (0.00 / 0)
I didn’t mean to imply that Mike only cares about the middle class, which is why I said my objection was perhaps a rhetorical one.  But a central element of progressive thought is to note how our fortunes are connected.  Given how ingrained the idea that we’re on our own is in our political discourse, I think its important to not reinforce this idea, especially when it fails to convey our values clearly.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]  




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS