Can Smartphone Apps Save The World?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Mar 13, 2010 at 08:30


On March 5, the South Coast Air Quality Management District held its monthly meeting in Long Beach, the heart of the most polluted part of its jurisdiction for cancer-causing pollutants.  They unveiled a draft plan to "backstop" the ports ongoing efforts to reduce pollution, and--as a relatively minor note--they also announced the release of a new smartphone app, described in this short video, shown at the meeting, now on their website:

The Power of AQMD in Your Hand

Designed and developed exclusively for the iPhone™, iPad, and iPod Touch®

NOW you can find out about air quality within the South Coast AQMD, as well as air quality news alerts, alternative vehicle fueling stations, and much more all in the palm of your hand, with the AQMD App for the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.

Download the AQMD App for the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch, available now in the App Store.

Get the AQMD Smartphone App and you will have the power to clean the air.

have the power to clean the air.

Download it now for FREE.

As I watched the video in the meeting, I was immediately struck by the enormous potential it represented, not just in itself, but as a prototype of potential citizen empowerment.  It both enables individuals to make personal, timely use of government-collected information, and empowers them to contribute to government effectiveness in protecting and securing the common good.  It makes government a partner in people improving their individual quality of life, and it makes people a partner in government improving everyone's quality of life.

Conceptually, there's nothing really new in this.  This is what liberalism has always been about: recasting government as a servant of the people, rather than their master.  But it does represent finding new ways to realize traditional liberal ends.  And pragmatically, it represents a potential gain in effectiveness that's virtually impossible to grasp at this early stage.  Just one example: Could a properly designed and implemented smartphone app have prevented the theft of the 2000 election in Florida, by exposing problems, enabling real-time corrections, and deterring malicious interference with people's voting rights?  And would that have drastically changed the course of history?  Is water wet?

Paul Rosenberg :: Can Smartphone Apps Save The World?
We've already seen the difference that mobile phones made in Iran last year.  Without them, the opposition would have been quickly crushed, and there would be little public record to even preservea dim memory of what had happened. With them, the long hard struggle for democracy in Iran continues with a vigor that would otherwise be unimaginable.  And there was no special app to help them, much less any force-multiplying infrastructure behind the app.  

Imagine what an election-protection smartphone app could do. It could feed into a dynamically-updated online database that everyone with an internet connection could monitor.  Any irregularity at any polling place in America could immediately be documented with a time-and-place-stamped video, linked to the precinct number, along with a violation code, so that anyone could track how many instances of different sorts of violations had been recorded at any level, from the individual precinct to the nation as a whole.  Of course the media--from blogs to broadcast news--would also be watching this national database, calling quick attention to developing problems.

Could it be messed with?  Of course.  But there would be far more rapid and public consequences than we've seen when past elections were messed with.

Saving the planet would be a bit more complicated.  But the AQMD app already gives some hints of how this might develop.  A single app wouldn't be the answer, but certain kinds of apps, working together could prove dramatically revolutionary.  Conceptually, the biggest problem we face right now is that powerful special interests can make money and gain or preserve power by externalizing their costs to the social and physical environment.  Global warming is just one result of this process. Ecosystem services depletion is a more comprehensive way of describing it.

What enables this is the simple fact that a small, concentrated, well-coordinated group of individuals benefits, while a large, diffuse, un-coordinate mass of humanity suffers.  The role of smartphone apps in saving the world would be to help change that calculus--to enable enough of the un-coordinated mass of humanity to coordinate itself in real time, without direction from above.

One key factor that could make this work is integration of two types of functionality. One is everyday usefulness, the other political action.  Most people are not political junkies, nor should they be.  But there are natural, inherent connections between the two--and the concentrated special interests understand this very well.  Well-designed smartphone apps would be ones that are primarily useful to people in their everyday lives, but that seamless integrate appropriate forms of potential for political action that flow directly out of those same everyday life experiences and needs.

Your Turn: An Invitation

I know this is a somewhat vague description.  But I think it's enough to spark some ideas, and sparking ideas is what I'm really interested in. So I'd like you to post your suggestions about examples of smartphone apps that could be used to accomplish a public good by harnessing citizen cooperation.  No example too trivial or too ambitious.  You just vaguely indicate what the app might do, or go into detail, like the AQMD videro does. Just brainstorm and share the results.

All other types of comments are welcome, too, of course.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm the sort of neo-Luddite (4.00 / 1)
who only uses my phone as a phone, so I'm ill equipped to add suggestions.

But I do appreciate a little practical optimism on this dreary morning.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


That's Why The Video Is So Helpful (4.00 / 1)
You don't have to have practical experience with smartphone apps to beging appreciating what it can do from this video.

At the meeting, they credited the team of people who created the app and the video--staffers who present in the room--and it seemed pretty clear that the video had been created more as an integrated part of the process, not as a marketing afterthought. Pretty cool, I thought.  

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
"Cui Bono?" App (0.00 / 0)
Maybe a real-time aggregator of campaign finance data with graphic displays of how money is flowing to and from contributors and office-holders.  Concurrently associate with timeline of legislative activities, including lobbying.

A Good Idea, But Not Quite What I'm Looking For (0.00 / 0)
This is a good idea, but it's entirely a political wonk-type app.

The power I'm looking for is the combination of a useful tool for the ordinary citizen who's not particularly focused on politics with features that empower them to act politically as a natural outgrowth of their everyday needs.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Was it in Wired, or the NYT? (0.00 / 0)
Anyway, I was reading an article just yesterday, in connection with the Toyota mess, which advocated making all the data collected by a car's on-board computer available in real-time, with suitable interpretations, to the owner of the car. RIght now, of course, the data is entirely proprietary.

What about nutrition information on packaged foods, available by scanning the barcode, and querying an online database, all while you're standing in the aisle, trying to hold your toddler away from the box of Froot Loops that somehow turned up right where you stopped the cart? I'll bet that if such information were provided by a third party, you'd put the package down straightaway, and head for the produce section.

The New Jerusalem? Maybe not, but I definitely think that you're on to something here, Paul. They already know everything about us; why shouldn't we return the favor? Shades of William Gibson, eh?


Yes! (4.00 / 1)
Those are just the right sort of examples. Start by giving folks immediately useful information that has political implications simply by empowering and informing.

Then add a few features that help them to act most specifically politically when that becomes necessary or appropriate.

Shades of William Gibson, eh?

Mirrorshades?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Second thoughts (4.00 / 2)
The key here, it seems to me, is ending, by law, the right of companies -- or the government, for that matter -- to classify certain information. Truly proprietary information, the kind which allows your innovations, and your diligence to be rewarded with a competitive advantage, is relatively restricted in scope. For example, the specific genetic modification which makes your corn seed produce higher yields might be legitimately protected, but absolutely not to regulatory agencies, nor should the results of research into its effects on pollinating insects, on the corn gene pool, or on your own health be prohibited to you as a consumer.

The Bush administration spent a good part of its time removing government data from the web. (I actually watched this happen in real time, when I was looking into EPA studies on the effectiveness of remediation methods for the tailings from copper smelters here in AZ. One day there were a dozen studies. A day later there were two, then none. Only the self-serving mining company studies were left.) Does anyone really suppose that the Obama administration is spending any time at all restoring this data?


[ Parent ]
What about social justice-minded product information in general? (4.00 / 2)
The conditions under which a product was made, the toxic materials it might or might not contain, are those materials sustainable, etc all seem to be questions a decent amount of people would like easily accessible answers to. And then you could connect that information up to organizations which fought for production improvements-unions, environmental groups, petitions on behalf of various bills, etc. So you'd be able to access problems and potential solutions in relatively few easy steps.

[ Parent ]
Trucking companies (0.00 / 0)
now track all of their trucks on the road in real time via gps.  


[ Parent ]
On Election Morning 2008 (4.00 / 2)
I was one of the lawyers working at Florida Precincts. There was a problem - and I published the results here on the front page using my blackberry.

http://openleft.com/diary/9682/

Each lawyer at the precincts in Florida were to check in with the campaign every 3 hours, and problems were then surfaced to reviewed by lawyers and action was taken.  In the case of the diary I posted here the morning of the election, other lawyers found the same thing and the issue was raised, and partially dealt with in conversations with the country board of elections.

In addition, the Obama campaign had set-up an automated facility where every two hours we were to call in with turnout figures from our precinct, giving the campaign real time data on turnout  However, the system got overwhelmed - I am sure it will be fixed next time - but you can imagine campaigns managing election day by deploying resources to precints where turnout is low.

With respect to voter protection I am not sure much can be done on election day better than was done by the Obama campaign, though twitter would have been a great device to
create public summary of the issues.

The larger issue here is the torrent of data that is being created in real time by thousands of different applications.  There are new economic measures that are being created directly from transactional data that will probably be far more accurate and timely than the economic measures we have now. This data will come to transform capital markets as well. Forward looking police departments are also looking at data (with significant implications for civil rights) to help them identify spikes in crime in certain locations.

What is happening is perhaps best thought of as a second renaissance, in the sense that the data that is being created will over the next 10 to 20 years redefine our understanding of the World.  Climate Change, for example, could not be understood without the ability to collect data in ways that did not exist 100 years ago.  People 100 years from now will look back and not be able to imagine a world where real time data is not available for everything.


Allow Me To Clarify/Tweak (4.00 / 1)
All that you're saying here is almost certainly true, but it's a bit off the mark from what I'm aiming for here, which is the empowerment of ordinary individuals, not the professionals and/or committed volunteers.

Regardling election protection, for example, there was a good deal of individual reporting colleted into a national database on election day in 2004.  This helped to underscore what a mess Ohio was in particular.  A local lawyer I know here in LA was one of the lawyers stationed in Ohio.  But they didn't have the capacity to adjust to what was happening in real time--such as the incredibly long lines at several colleges, where it took some people 8-12 hours to vote.

It's the empowerment of individual citizens that I see as key--designing software that does that in such a way that professionals (including professional volunteers such as you and my friend) are not so much the frontline warriors, but skilled partners with ordinary citizens who are themselves such frontline warriors.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Whether individual (0.00 / 0)
empowerment or better social control will result is an open question.

Think about the log files at Google for a moment.  It is probably the single best insight to what people are thinking and feeling that has ever been created.  When Google correlated H1N1 searches to location, there were able to track the progress of the disease better than the CDC was.  AND THAT DATA IS PRIVATELY OWNED and CAN BE PURCHASED.  

The next Civil Rights frontier will be for the right to be anonymous and the right for data to be public owned.

In the future the most powerful people in the world may well be statisticials and data miners.  


[ Parent ]
The thing I find about data (4.00 / 1)
is that what's most important about it is less how much of it there is, than its quality, and how it's organized and presented. The sheer amount of data out there is growing exponentially. But properly gathered, organized and presented--and the tools and methods to do this are already highly developed and growing more powerful and sophisticated every day--this shouldn't have to be a huge problem. And the "side" that's better able to do such things will be vastly better positioned to lead society in the future, making today's partisan wars seem like minor skirmishes that are mere preparation and practice for what's to come. And if I'm right, our side is in a much, much better place than the other side, because we're much, much more sophisticated, intellectually and technologically.

And we spell and write better, too. :-)

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
But Who IS "Our Side"? (4.00 / 1)
In the long run, the technocratic neoliberals very much do not look to be on "our side", kovie.

And they're not about to empower people to effectively challenge their self-positioning as our "protectors and defenders".

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
I meant progressives--REAL progressives (4.00 / 2)
and not pseudo-progressive (and pseudo-intellectual) neolib technocrats. There are obviously more than two sides here, with much overlap, and each will have the opportunity to leverage new technologies to their advantage. But "our" side is hardly lacking in brain power. In fact, I'd argue that on a "per capita" basis, we're smarter than any other single side, including neolib technocrats--most of whom have struck me as more clever and devious than genuinely brilliant.

The present and near term future might belong to them, but the long-term future belongs to whoever is best able, and most determined, to capture it. And that can be "us", especially given our intellectual and technological advantages. What is lacking is determination, and effort--not ability.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
The Chinese/Iranian/Google books model (4.00 / 2)
If they can't fight us by fair means, they'll use foul ones. Which is why net neutrality is important, and also why we'll probably lose the battle for it.

I really think that William Gibson had the right idea. The bureaucrats will try to lock everything up, and the cowboys will try to pry it open again. It's the only form of cyberwar that makes any sense in present or foreseeable circumstances. If corporate interests or the government own our raw data, and Google owns our monographs, and any of them begin to fiddle with what's ours, we'll just have to steal it back. If we have to do it on our own, with no help from them, so be it. Under those conditions, I'd be happy to be a criminal, wouldn't you?


[ Parent ]
Same Old Same Old (4.00 / 1)
The law locks up both man and woman
Who steals the goose from off the commons
And lets the greater felon loose
Who steals the commons from the goose
    --Anon


"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
The cause of the financial crisis (4.00 / 1)
was the misuse of data.  Wired has a must read story about the formula that was created from mortgage data that was supposed to predict the risk of morgage default.  

The formula, a complicated linear regression model, was a classic misuse of statistics.  It did not consider exogenous variables and failed miserably.  Yet that formula was used by investment banks and mortgage companies to evaluate risk.

As you suggest, the torrent of data should not be confused with the work required to UNDERSTAND the data correctly.

The future in some ways belongs to the statistician.  You can already see this in politics with the rise of sites like 538.


[ Parent ]
Yes, But... (4.00 / 1)
There was also several centuries of data telling folks that what goes up must come down--not to mention Hyman Minsky's refined explanation of how that worked.

Ignoring certain unwanted data played just as important a role as mis-manpiluting other data.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
And such misuse isn't always deliberate (4.00 / 2)
I'm always reminded of the university library building (I think it was U of Penn) that was built without taking into considering the weight of the books, shelves and other materials that would go into the building once it was in use, so the loads were all off and the building had to either be rebuilt or expensively retrofitted.

To err is human. To really screw things up requires an engineer (statistician, logician, charismatic bipartisan centrist, computer...).

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
The iPad & tablet technology will accelerate this (4.00 / 1)
For all the criticism that it's gotten since being announced (some deserved, some not, and all somewhat suspect given that it hasn't even been released), I think that the iPad, even if it itself won't be as big of a success as Apple and its fanbots hope it will be, will turn the tablet format into the single most popular format for accessing and interacting with multiple digital media types (e.g. music, video, text, games, etc.) within a few years.

I predict this because for most people, "accessing" and "interacting with" digital media is mainly a passive activity, e.g. listening to music, watching TV or videos, etc., and the tablet format strikes me as the ideal one for doing this for most people, because phones and similarly-sized devices like MP3 players (some of which now have internet capability) are too small for extended visual media use, and laptops (including netbooks) are too bulky, heavy and unwieldy for most people's comfort.

The fact that millions of people use both types of devices at present for media-related uses is, I think, more a function of there not yet being a viable superior alternative to them than to their being ideal devices for such uses. Once tablets become viable alternatives to them, I expect millions of people to gradually transition to them as their preferred media access devices, because they'll have much bigger and easier to view screens than phones, while still being much lighter and easier to carry around and use than laptops.

Basically, they'll be the perfect device for most people for passively accessing (and a less than perfect but still servicable device for actively interacting with, because they'll lack built-in keyboards) digital media, be it TV, videos, movies, images, music, webcams, eBooks and eMagazines, online news, and of course the entire internet. And this will open up a whole new world of opportunities for anyone able and willing to take advantage of them, including progressives.

I mean, imagine watching OpenLeftTV on a tablet!

Paul--are you ready for your closeup?

But seriously, this technology has SO much potential.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


Mine's already on order (N/T) (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I'm going to wait until a generation or two (4.00 / 1)
of these devices comes out before getting one myself, to get the kinks out, mature the technology, and let the segment figure out what it is and isn't best at. For example, I'm going to need a tablet that has much more storage capacity than the initial iPads, to store the sort of media that I'll want to store on it. I also don't like that it's missing a webcam and USB ports (and Bluetooth, I believe). But it seems like a great first generation prototype (that you're obviously going to post-beta test, heh) that will lead to much better and more refined versions within a few years. And I'd love to hear your take on it once you get it.

For myself, I just got a new "ultraportable" laptop, basically a bigger and more powerful "netbook" that's big and powerful to actually use as a day to day PC, so this will be my pseudo-"tablet" for the next few years.

And, in case anyone's wondering and/or in the market for such a device themselves, it's a Gateway EC1456u, 3.1 lbs, 11.6" screen, 500GB HD, 4GB RAM, 7+ hrs battery life, dual core ultra-low voltage Pentium CPU laptop, whose main weaknesses are a so-so keyboard and no built-in Bluetooth (which I use to "tether" it to my cell phone for "free" 3G internet access, and which I overcome with a tiny Bluetooth USB adapter). If you want to travel light, not spend too much ($600) and still have a "real" computer (netbooks, I've heard, are too slow and small for many uses), this is a great buy. Acer, which owns Gateway, sells essentially the same laptop under its own 1810 line. (And no, I don't work for either company!)

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
Me, I'm Holding Out For A Belt-Clip Hologram Display Device (4.00 / 1)
And I won't accept anything less!

Thought-activated, of course!

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Isn't that what Hello Kitty is all about? (4.00 / 1)


"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

[ Parent ]
Anyone else notice (0.00 / 0)
that the embedded clip looks like an ad for Apple? Why "Exclusively for iPhone, iPad, iTouch..." If the goal is environmental activism, what purpose does that exclusivity serve?

Now if they said, "Currently on iPhone, iPad, iTouch" and maybe mentioned that it could be on less expensive (but just as capable) devices later, then I would not look at it as an Apple promotion. This may not be greenwashing, but the "exclusively for" phrase makes me want to write it off immediately. Even though I have an iPhone (which I obviously resent paying for...)

ec=-8.50 soc=-8.41   (3,967 Watts)


Repeat Often (4.00 / 3)
This is what liberalism has always been about: recasting government as a servant of the people, rather than their master.

I've never heard this put so perfectly and distinctly.

Although this is obvious, I've never thought of it in this way, mainly because it is too obvious.  However, conservative's built in assumption of top down power, chain of command and leaders cast as masters makes this a very nice contrast.

This needs to be repeated often.


Thanks Mark! (4.00 / 1)
Your appreciation is much appreciated.

Of course, conservatives will reply by calling folks all sorts of names for needing the help of government.  But you can only knock so much sense into people's head at one time.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
And we should reply (4.00 / 2)
following Dean Baker that:

The reality is that conservatives have been quite actively using the power of the government to shape market outcomes in ways that redistribute income upward. However, conservatives have been clever enough to not own up to their role in this process, pretending all along that everything is just the natural working of the market. And, progressives have been foolish enough to go along with this view.

Unless you are an anarchist, the argument isn't over whether to have government, but rather whether it will serve all our interests or some of our interests. Your summary of the liberal answer to that question is a powerful one.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
Indeedy-Do! (4.00 / 2)
As I've noted before, the Boston Teaparty wasn't anti-tax, it was anti-non-representation.  The anti-tax tradition in America came from the Southern slaveholders, who didn't want government telling them what to do.

But even they were strongly in favor of having the government create wealth for them. What else was the entire Southern slaveocracy all about?

That's how the seedling was bent.  That's how the tree has grown.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
And this is a crucial difference between the original tea party (4.00 / 3)
and these pathetic wanabees. The originals weren't upset at the various taxes that were imposed on them, per se (which were actually not that severe and arguably quite justified seeing as they were meant to pay for the French & Indian war that the colonists themselves started--especially Washington when he was a junior British officer--and whose outcome most benefitted said colonists), as they were at their being imposed on them without any say by them on the matter.

Whereas Caribou Barbie & Co. absolutely have a say in the process of determining which taxes are imposed on them. They might not always have enough say to block taxes that they don't like, but that's how the constitutional democracy that they purport to revere works. What they're REALLY upset about isn't the process, but a particular outcome of this process, which happens to not favor THEM (and even that's open to debate, seeing as they often end up benefitting from and/or support what these taxes are used to pay for).

THEY are the real "welfare cheats", not wanting to pay for things they like and use, with Sarah Palin their "Welfare Queen". How un-American.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS