Arizona conundrum: voting at the ballot box vs. voting with your feet

by: Adam Bink

Tue Apr 27, 2010 at 15:30


Atrios raises an interesting question- should those pissed off by Arizona's new immigration law do as Margaret Cho does:

Or vote with their feet, as he says, by getting the hell out of Arizona?

On its face, it may seem as simple as coming down to whether you're undocumented or not. If you're undocumented and now at greater risk of being deported, of course you would leave. Proof of ID is required at the polls (or providing similar documents), so how much collective mobilization can actually be had by undocumented immigrants who choose to stay?

I don't actually think it's that simple at all. There is something to be said for staying to influence others and the outcome of an election. I'm gay, and if my local elected officials passed a law that allowed discrimination in something extremely personal- like being required to sign a document swearing that I am straight before being able to get a job or apartment, or being arrested for holding hands with my lover in public- I could say "fuck you" to the District of Columbia and move.

Or I could talk to every single straight ally I know and make them aware of how heinous the law is, who voted for it, etc. Not to mention organizing the LGBT community. I say this because when the Obama administration extended hospital benefits for same-sex couples, I wrote at the time how many e-mails I got from straight allies who didn't know that wasn't already law- and when I wrote back to mention that it's legal to discriminate in employment on the basis of sexual orientation in 29 states, they were even further shocked. Despite the media glare on the Arizona law prior to Gov. Brewer's signature, some people just don't get what life is like for oppressed communities, and it takes a member of that community to, as Harvey Milk put it, "educate" that community, be they Dan Whites or straight friends.

So there is something to be said for staying and fighting. It's a very personal choice and certainly depends on each individual's situation in a variety of respects- and it's not my place or anyone else's to make a blanket ask to do either. And if a state like Oklahoma passed one of those anti-gay laws, it's going to be a long slog towards equality. But oppressed communities simply packing up and leaving whenever they are oppressed may not be the best strategy, both in terms of repealing the law and in terms of creating allies- neighbors, co-workers, other kids at school, etc.- who treat you as you'd want to be treated over the long-term.

Adam Bink :: Arizona conundrum: voting at the ballot box vs. voting with your feet

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
it's not really a choice whether you stay or go for a lot of people (4.00 / 1)
i would guess people have lives, financial obligations, commitments, families, etc.  most people have to vote with their feet (one way or the other - they may not be able to leave, they may not be able to stay).

also, this has a huge impact on people besides undocumented people - it seems to say that the arizona government believes the government should have the license to stop anyone working class latino (and others!) at any time.  

Anyway, here's what happened the last time they tried to undermine the immigrant community in phoenix so crassly (look at 2006):

http://news.google.com/archive...

So I'm imagining a lot of people will fight this in the short run, if the last time is any indication (though that was national, not one state).  This is, even by the standards of 2010, beyond the pale.


Right (4.00 / 1)
At least two groups of people who may make such a decision- those who are undocumented put at risk by the law, and those who are not but still pissed off (which can include, as you point out, working-class Latinos, but also folks who look and sound like me but are pissed off just the same).

Get your copy of The Progressive Revolution
Me on Facebook

Me on Twitter


[ Parent ]
Individual, personal decisions (4.00 / 1)
Definitely the stay or go decision has to be made by each person, couple, family, and for some, circumstances might mean having to stay when you'd rather leave, or leave when you'd rather stay.

But whether by staying or leaving, the "fight" needs to occur. I'm thinking of the wave of mini-DOMAs which occurred some years ago, with state after state passing some version of "one man, one woman" marriage definition law. I don't think it's as likely that so many other states will follow Arizona in this, but opposing such drastic legislative actions is essential.

Thanks for the post, Adam.


I'm with Cho. (4.00 / 2)
And it's why I live in a red state -- I was born here, and I'm not ceding one inch of ground to the haters without a fight.

Montani semper liberi

Scared (4.00 / 3)
The Arizona Republic, the state's key newspaper, is reporting something else.  The establishment put up with this for years when Arizona refused to recognize Martin Luther King Day as a holiday.  They lost a Super Bowl and a whole lot else before the state caved.  The boycott is on and the state has already lost tits first convention.  The fear is very real for the business people and hotel business.

We can win this one and we can win big.  It won't take as long a push this time.  The same thing that caused the business community in Alabama to give in to the bus boycott is on our side.  Fear and greed can work for us.


Spare me the drama (0.00 / 0)
Reminds me of Alec Baldwin ("if Bush get's elected, I'm leavin' the country!!!"). I suspect the author is guilty of emotional hyperbole, but...if he's serious I'll buy him a one-way ticket on Greyhound back to San Francisco. That is, if San Francisco's "boycott" hasn't shut down the Greyhound routes from Arizona yet.


USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
Donate to Open Left





QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search