Whining Wall Streeters

by: Mike Lux

Fri Jul 09, 2010 at 13:59


We're seeing lots of media stories cropping up these days about how very, very angry Wall Street tycoons are at certain nasty Democrats who have had the temerity, the sheer gall, to stand up to them on certain issues. They are giving a lot less money to Democrats, and a lot more to Republicans- which sounds to me like the best single argument for voting Democratic that I have heard in a while.

My heart bleeds for these poor persecuted bankers and traders. People are speaking poorly of them for trashing the economy and then having to be bailed out when they are used to being worshiped by politicians and journalists, and most hurtful of all, they are not getting every single thing they want out of Congress, regulators, and the White House as they are used to. It's a shock to them.

They are regrouping, though, making sure reporters know that they just won't give as much money to Democrats as they used. And they have seen all the fun the tea partiers and progressives have had running primaries against people, so they are starting to get into the act. Earlier this year, they almost convinced Harold Ford to challenge Kirsten Gillibrand in the Senate race on the incredibly compelling "Let's stop beating up on Wall Street" platform. That didn't work out so well, but they did at least get a woman named Reshma Saujani to challenge Carolyn Maloney in a primary for her House seat. Sanjani has raised at least 800 K from Wall Street traders, using quotes like "We need to extend a hand [to Wall Street] rather than a fist" to proclaim her love for the big bankers.

Maloney has been irritating the hell out of Wall Street types for a while now. Her credit card consumer bill of rights has cost Visa, Mastercard, and the big banks billions of dollars; she played an incredibly important role negotiating a good compromise on the swipe fee issue that will move billions more from bank profits into merchants and small businesspeople's pockets; her overall role on the financial reform bill was incredibly constructive and important.

Us progressives are justifiably angered at how much power Wall Street and other big corporate interests have over our government, but we also sometimes forget the wealth and power of the industries we oppose. It takes real courage for leaders like Carolyn Maloney to take on the titans of Wall St, because they can quickly find a candidate who is happy to be in their pocket and can quickly raise them a boatload of money to take potshots at them. Here's a shout-out Carolyn Maloney: thanks for having the guts to be on the side of us regular folks.  

Mike Lux :: Whining Wall Streeters

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Saujani (4.00 / 1)
Reshma Saujani inexplicably was able to get a hit on Hardball last night. Considering she's down 75 points in the poll, it was quite an accomplishment. Jane Hamsher has a great post taking down some of Saujani's bull**** and her Wall Street funded campaign.

There's nothing wrong with Wall Street running a candidate to defeat a liberal Democratic incumbent. But damned if they're going to have any success now. And that's a fine thing.


For what ever reason .. (4.00 / 1)
she came unprepared .. and Tweety wasn't even hard on her

[ Parent ]
Mike .. (4.00 / 1)
do you know why people like Steve Rattner are Democrats?  Is it because they view it as a "cool" label?  chic?  Because he's the kind of person that wants to destroy the party from the inside

They're probably socially liberal (4.00 / 1)
Same way there are union workers who won't vote for Democrats because Democrats are (generally speaking) pro-choice and pro-gay marriage.

Wall Street bankers might not like some Democratic priorities, but I bet any would get along better with Barack Obama than with Sarah Palin.


[ Parent ]
That's what I figured ... (4.00 / 1)
but having a woefully unprepared candidate isn't going to get them anywhere

[ Parent ]
And this in a nutshell (4.00 / 1)
Is why the Democratic establishment runs away from populism.  They favor the bourgeois social liberals over the people who are fertile ground for a populist progressive economic appeal because they have other priorities.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

[ Parent ]
folks like Rattner (4.00 / 1)
I think the socially liberal thing is certainly a part of it- and many folks see the religious fundamentalism and whacked out libertarianism in the Republican party and get freaked by it. I also think in big cities like NYC, so many folks are Democrats that some of these might feel more socially isolated if they weren't.
Some of the Wall Street Dems I have known and worked with over the years actually do believe in things like more money for the poor, for public education, etc. But they still genuflect to the market uber alles.

[ Parent ]
Absolutely. (4.00 / 1)
We're talking about well-educated, well-heeled people here, with fairly sophisticated views about a lot of things. Even, ahem, poverty.

But Upton Sinclair knew all too well why ultimately these people will always tow the other line:

"It's difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends on him not understanding it."

In the end, social liberalism is a luxury, not a necessity for these people. They still want to get invited to the gallery openings and the cool parties--and I can tell you, there's nothing wrong with that! It makes them feel good. But it doesn't pay them their outrageous bonuses for operating a massive Ponzi scheme on the rest of the nation, wrecking what little is left of our economy. (Heh. And these people claim to know economics!)

Push comes to shove, they'll scream bloody murder before the Ponzi Scheme gets rolled up. That's what butters their bread and pays the mortgage on the summer home on The Vineyard and plumps up their off-shore, tax-free bank accounts. Even the slightest intimation of milquetoast pseudo-reform has them hyperventilating like a missionary about to be consumed by cannibals. That's how they defend their turf.

But if you chat with them without all that philosophical baggage, they're highly intelligent, thoughtful people. If you want charity, go to Wall Street.

If you want justice, you should look elsewhere, mate!

"A person buying ordinary products in a supermarket is in touch with his deepest emotions." -- John Kenneth Galbraith


[ Parent ]
Save Wall Street From Itself (4.00 / 3)
Three cheers for Maloney, a New Yorker who strays from Wall Street is like a West Virginian who stands up to King Coal.  I don't hate Wall Street, I just hate the excesses and long-term pain that come from weak regulation and short-term gain.  FDR saved Wall Street, I hope Obama does the same but being beholden to every greedy instinct on Wall Street just makes the inevitable crashes much worse.  





USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

National House Ballot All Polls


Without Rasmussen


Senate Forecast All Polls

Without Rasmussen

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search