Weekly Pulse: Giffords Shooting Reveals Flaws in U.S. Mental Health Services

by: The Media Consortium

Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 17:30


( – promoted by Paul Rosenberg)

By Lindsay Beyerstein, Media Consortium blogger

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was shot in the head at a constituent outreach event in a supermarket parking lot in Tucson on Saturday. In all, the gunman shot 18 people, killing 6, including a federal judge and a 9-year-old girl.

Jamelle Bouie of TAPPED urges President Obama to take up the issue of mental health care in his upcoming speech on the mass shooting. Several people who knew the alleged shooter came forward with stories of bizarre behavior and run-ins with campus police at his community college. College administrators ordered him to seek treatment before he returned to school, but he does not appear to have done so.

H. Clarke Romans of the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Southern Arizona explained to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! that mental health services in Arizona have been devastated by budget cuts.

In 2008 the state eliminated support services for all non-Medicaid behavioral health patients and stopped covering most brand-name psychiatric drugs. At least 28,000 Arizonans were affected. Arizonans with mental illnesses can expect even more cuts in the future as the state slashes spending in an attempt to address its budget shortfall.

In AlterNet, Adele Stan, argues that, while we don’t yet know the gunman’s motives, the right wing’s intensifying campaign of anti-government hysteria and violent rhetoric may have emboldened an already disturbed person:

Had the vitriolic rhetoric that today shapes Arizona’s political landscape (and, indeed, our national landscape) never come to call, Loughner may have found a different reason to go on a killing spree. But that vitriol does exist as a powerful prompt to the paranoid, and those who publicly deem war on the federal government a patriot’s duty should today be doing some soul-searching.

 
The Media Consortium :: Weekly Pulse: Giffords Shooting Reveals Flaws in U.S. Mental Health Services

Reform repeal vote on hold

The House Republicans had scheduled a vote to repeal health care reform this week, but the vote has been postponed in the wake of the Giffords shooting. However, the conservative U.S. Chamber of Commerce threw its full weight behind the repeal effort on Tuesday, according to Suzy Khimm of Mother Jones. The Chamber is going back on its earlier pledge not to oppose health care reform outright.

CA insurer hikes rates by 59%

Nearly 200,000 policyholders in California are reeling from a 59% rate hike by Blue Shield, Brie Cadman reports for Change.org. According to the company, the increase was not due to health care reform, but rather to “increased utilization.” State insurance officials are reviewing the rate hike, but they can’t reverse it unless they find that Blue Shield fails to meet the legal medical loss ratio (percentage of premiums spent on medical care).

Reproductive rights in the states

Rachel Gould and Elizabeth Nash of the Guttmacher Institute recap reproductive rights in the states at RH Reality Check. Last year, 44 states and the District of Columbia considered 950 repro rights-related measures on issues ranging from abortion to sex ed. By year’s end, 89 new laws had been enacted in 32 states and DC. Of these, 39 were abortion laws.

The vast majority of new abortion laws served to further restrict women’s access to abortion. The passage of the Affordable Care Act spurred several states to pass laws restricting insurance coverage for abortions. The District of Columbia’s decision to reinstate public funding was one of the few exceptions to the trend of restrictive new laws.

Autism/vaccine study based on “deliberate fraud”

The author of a discredited study purporting to link autism and vaccines schemed to profit from his tainted research from the very beginning, according to new research published in the British Medical Journal.

It turns out that the lead author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, was secretly working on a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers when he published a study in The Lancet that appeared to show a link between vaccines and autism. We now know that Wakefield falsified the findings that sparked a global panic over the safety of childhood vaccines.

The journal retracted the paper last year. Wakefield was stripped of his license to practice medicine.

Some observers think these revelations will finally put the debate over vaccines and autism to rest. Kristina Chew of Care2 is doubtful:

I am very sure that, even with all the facts,  data, and evidence laid before them, those who believe that vaccines or  something in vaccines caused or somehow ‘contributed’ to their child  becoming autistic will stand by their claims, and by Wakefield.  Some of  these persons are my friends. They are parents, as am I, of autistic  children.

Wakefield’s die hard supporters weren’t swayed by earlier revelations of shoddy research and unethical conduct. It seems unlikely that this new found conflict of interest will change their minds.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive   reporting about health care by members of The Media Consortium.  It  is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse for  a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on  Twitter. And for the best   progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care  and  immigration issues, check out The Audit,  The Mulch,   and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of  leading independent media outlets.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Solutions (4.00 / 1)
I find it amazing how many solutions to the shooting liberals have.  With better mental health services, this never would have happened in the first place.  If the assault weapon ban hadn’t expired in 2004, half as many bullets would have been fired.  

The conservatives only have “it isn’t my fault” and, insanely, the call for more guns.


 
And so… (4.00 / 1)
“solutions” are bad? Plus, you have a strawman there: a liberal quote here says
Loughner may have found a different reason to go on a killing spree.
Most liberals I have heard talking about this acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state clearly that any “solutions” are partial and would not necessarily have prevented this event.  Yet there are many things we could do as a country to minimize the chances of such events occuring, and some of the proposed solutions try to get at that.

[ Parent ]  
huh? (0.00 / 0)
I must be a worse writer than I thought.  Was I really that unclear?

And so…  “solutions” are bad?

Where did you get that idea?  My whole point was liberals have many, many ways to prevent this kind of tragedy and that events like this are much less likely in a liberal society than a conservative one.  I was insulting conservatives, not liberals.

You seriously misread what I wrote.  I’ll take half the blame, but dude, you get the rest.


[ Parent ]  
In Florida (4.00 / 1)
the GOP dominated legislature is considering a bill to make it illegal for a doctor to ask patients if they have guns in their houses.  God forbid we should trample on the rights of gun owners, even if they have mentally-ill family members who could be a danger to everyone.  

 
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS