Next Big Change Up: Health Care Reform

by: Mike Lux

Fri Feb 27, 2009 at 15:14


Buy your copy of my new book, The Progressive Revolution: How the Best in America Came to Be

While the work on stabilizing the banking system, passing the Obama budget, and working on the other big issues the President has prioritized will all continue steadily along in the coming months, it is clear that health care reform is the next big debate on the President's mind.  The first big signal of this was the way he deftly, and rightly, turned the fiscal responsibility summit into mainly a discussion on health care reform, and then announced on the spot that there would be a health care summit next week.  Then, in his speech to the nation Tuesday night, he made a push for fundamental reform this year.  And finally this week, his budget includes a $634 billion "down payment" on the money needed for health reform.  Clearly the President is gearing up for a big battle.  

As one of the earliest members of the Clinton White House health care team, I am very encouraged by the early strategic signs coming from President Obama. As I discuss in my book, The Progressive Revolution: How the Best in America Came to Be, we made some big mistakes in the Clinton drive for health care reform that doomed our chances for victory, and President Obama's early decisions suggest that they are learning at least some of the right lessons from that experience.  Here are some things I am encouraged about:

1. Obama said we needed to do serious reform this year. In early 1993, President Clinton got convinced by Bob Rubin and other corporate Democrats to delay pushing for health care until 1994, after the first budget fight and after they could push their beloved NAFTA through.  President Obama set a great tone in his speech Tuesday night: We're going to go big, and we're going to do it this year.

2. Putting a down payment into the budget. Rubin and his allies also convinced President Clinton that reducing the deficit was more important than health care, and that money for health care should all be done later.  It was a huge mistake, making the budget numbers for health care reform politically unpalatable.  While President Obama hasn't put in every dollar needed for health reform in this budget, he has sent a budget that does have a significant $634 billion down payment.

3. Leaving the details to Congress. Another major mistake was to take the first year of Clinton's term to write an excruciatingly detailed piece of legislation.  The result was that we spent a year being lobbied by every outside group imaginable on every detail of the bill (I personally met with over 1,500 different groups on the bill that year) and then as soon as it got sent to the Hill, that same lobbying process began with Capitol Hill.  In the meantime, we lost momentum and passion, and the insurance industry picked us apart by focusing on the tiny details of the bill in their infamous Harry and Louise ads.

Obama is sending clear signals that he is going to leave the details of the legislation up to Congress.

We have a long way to go to pass a serious health reform bill, and the obstacles are big to getting it done.  Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, LBJ, even Nixon all tried before President Clinton's plan went up in flames.  But Barack Obama knows how messed up our health care system is, and he knows we need big change.  I'm glad he has the guts to take it on, and I'm glad to see his early strategic moves on it are smart ones.

Mike Lux :: Next Big Change Up: Health Care Reform

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Should be fun ... (4.00 / 2)
Great strategy to get many of these large battles done early. Better for the economy, the people, and politically.

This will feed into 2010 and keep the momentum really strong.

Even though you may not agree with everything Obama does (I do not) perhaps his greatest quality is that he does listen and change when the right forces are pushing him.


Which is why its very important (0.00 / 0)
for us to stop whining and starting putting pressure. I was heartened to hear Moveon, Greenwald and others mobilizing to form a group designed to push democrats and the administration further to the left. I have no doubt that ideologically Obama is with us on almost all the relevant issues, I know his politics going back to Chicago and he's no centrist. We just have to make sure its politically palatable.  

[ Parent ]
Will there be a public (0.00 / 0)
option?

If you are refering to the plan ... (0.00 / 0)
I am assuming so, but since he is leaving the details of the plan to Congress we will have to wait a while before that question can be answered.

[ Parent ]
that is the key question (4.00 / 3)
Without a public option a mandate would do more harm than good.

I'm not for shoveling hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money to private insurers.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Yes (4.00 / 4)
This is part of the strategy of letting Congress shape the details.  We may not have the numbers to push through single-payer, but we definitely have the numbers to push through a public option that's a pathway toward it.  And there explicitly is a roll-back of overpayments to private Medicare Advantage plans, which was essentially a subsidy to help undermine Medicare itself.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Ah, somehow I missed that (4.00 / 3)
It still seems odd to me that the administration would publish a set of principles without including that. Because we know Max Baucus is against the public option, so I'm wondering how leaving it out will somehow convince him to put it in anyway?

I'm not concerned with the House. It's the Senate that will be causing all the heartburn on this issue. Perhaps Baucus will surprise on the upside?

With a well designed public option we have the means to transit to single payer. Without it, we can forget about it for [choose the deity of your liking] knows how long.

A purely private system will only give us the choice of which corporation shall deny us healthcare when we most need it.

So here's hoping you're right!

"In our country, the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State" -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn


[ Parent ]
Very honest look back at what killed health care reform (0.00 / 0)
in the 90's

Following Rubin's advice has been costly and harmful and too many Democrats have to live with that.


A couple thoughts (0.00 / 0)
Ezra Klein put up Obama's eight principles for health care reform and thus far it's all about finances. Nowhere are public health goals/standards mentioned. Nowhere is the quality of patient care mentioned. No patient's rights. Just some stuff about preventative medicine, which is nice, but doesn't mean much when you're already sick.

It's nice to see they want healthcare to be affordable, but since there's no public option, that will most likely translate into even more tightly rationed healthcare.

• Guarantee Choice. The plan should provide Americans a choice of health plans and physicians. People will be allowed to keep their own doctor and their employer-based health plan.

• Make Health Coverage Affordable. The plan must reduce waste and fraud, high administrative costs, unnecessary tests and services, and other inefficiencies that drive up costs with no added health benefits.

• Protect Families' Financial Health. The plan must reduce the growing premiums and other costs American citizens and businesses pay for health care. People must be protected from bankruptcy due to catastrophic illness.

• Invest in Prevention and Wellness. The plan must invest in public health measures proven to reduce cost drivers in our system-such as obesity, sedentary lifestyles, and smoking-as well as guarantee access to proven preventive treatments.

• Provide Portability of Coverage. People should not be locked into their job just to secure health coverage, and no American should be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions.

• Aim for Universality. The plan must put the United States on a clear path to cover all Americans.

• Improve Patient Safety and Quality Care. The plan must ensure the implementation of proven patient safety measures and provide incentives for changes in the delivery system to reduce unnecessary variability in patient care. It must support the widespread use of health information technology with rigorous privacy protections and the development of data on the effectiveness of medical interventions to improve the quality of care delivered.

• Maintain Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability. The plan must pay for itself by reducing the level of cost growth, improving productivity, and dedicating additional sources of revenue.

Per your Number 2, I have to agree it was really nice to that put into the budget, even as a placeholder. This would be a first and a nice one.

Per your Number 3, I would simply caution that also in '93 Bill Clinton punted Campaign Finance Reform to congress, with predictable results. I don't see punting to congress as leadership in any sense of the word, especially given Max Baucus' corporatist proclivities.  

The lack of basic principles with the respect to public health, quality of healthcare and its outcomes is a stunning omission.

Yeah, it's great that I won't go bankrupt if I get sick, but will i stand any chance of getting expensive work done if it eats into profits or revenue neutrality? Isn't that the biggest single problem with our Health Care Denial Industry in the first place? Personally, I'd rather BK than die from a treatable condition because "it's not cost effective" to get treatment. But hey, at least I'll be "revenue neutral!" (I know, I'm being a tad hyperbolic... apologies :^P )

I don't see anything in these "principles" that addresses the real needs of patients and potential patients.


"In our country, the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State" -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn


We just need more accessible clinics (0.00 / 0)
and I mean real clinics not the health care places in each county and town. St charles MO has a great clinic that meets every Wednesday at the Salvation Army place where they hold dinners every night and give out excess food.

Doctors donate their time every Wednesday morning. You make an appointment and you are seen for free. You don't have to go through a big bureaucratic number every time you go there. It works.


Now if those doctors could just be paid (0.00 / 0)
it would be perfect. They write prescriptions and give out samples.

[ Parent ]
$634 billion down payment (0.00 / 0)
every penny will go to insurance companies.

Over 1,500 Groups! (0.00 / 0)
You should do a post listing these groups to show how large, complicated, intertwined and entrencted the existing health care system is.  And that was 16 years ago.

You could become the go to blogger in educating us as the Obama attempt at health care reform moves forward.  This post is a good start.  

I don't see the wisdom in letting Congress come up with the details.  Too many diverse agendas and opinions, some informed and some less so.  The White House has to take the lead and control this beast as much as possible.  

Of course, the fundamental problem is that a majority of people and almost all of the existing interests are perfectly happy with the way the system is now.  In your opinion, is real reform doable?

 


I hate to be a wet blanket (0.00 / 0)
But even the best laid plans are going to end up hinging on the economy.  The macroeconomic forecasts the White House has been using are pretty absurd, and the MSM is now starting to pick up on this.  In Q4 2008 the economy contracted at an annualized rate of 6.2% and some analysts are now predicting a contraction in Q1 2009 at an annualized rate of 10%, which is just horrendous.

This sucks because everything else is set up perfectly for health care reform.  But if the macroeconomic outlook does end up as bad as it is starting to appear, its going to be really, really hard politically.

Incidentally, I find the "creativity" of the growth prediction on the part of the Obama administration a bit off-putting, especially since he is going around claiming that this is the most transparent budget ever.

Double incidentally, progressives should start working on a media strategy to counteract the inevitable right-wing meme that the economy contracting at lightspeed in Q1 is somehow Obama's fault.

John McCain: Health insurance for low income children represents an "unfunded liability."


Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search