The security theater isn't at the airport

by: Adam Bink

Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:00


A quick word on the TSA scanner/pat-down outrage, after reading Digby’s piece on “security theater”, and TSA Administrator John Pistol’s op-ed in yesterday’s USA Today.

I attended Yom Kippur services a few months ago at Temple Beth Am synagogue in Williamsville, New York, as I do pretty much every year. Every year patrons are asked to remove objects from their pockets and are patted down. I was, it went smoothly, and I went on my way.

I was in Charlottesville last Saturday for a Dave Matthews Band show, and I was patted down before entering John Paul Jones Arena, like every other patron.

I will be home for Thanksgiving this week and will attend a Buffalo Sabres game on Friday, and will be patted down, like I am at every Sabres home game.

The attendance at these three events, non-overlapping, is just under 35,000 people. Yet those screenings were and always are so pathetically cursory that I often joke with my companions on the way in about the knifes or other weapons I could have easily hidden in my shoe, under my belt, or any number of other places. If they can’t stop a guy like me from bringing a weapon in, they sure can’t stop someone a lot better and more dangerous than me. But hey, we shouldn’t go too far into people’s privacy- just far enough to keep people feeling safe.

And you know what? That’s the real security theater, here- not the airports. It’s the events that have tens of thousands, even a hundred thousand people attending, but don’t involve an airplane, so just-a-little-screening-but-not-too-much will do. Often it’s because of money- I bet some authorities would like to have screening at every DC metro stop, but it’s not doable. And I don’t want my civil liberties violated, but I’d also like to not get hurt attending a concert, or religious service, or sporting event. Yet when TSA decides it will do that job, except doing it in a way that is far more thorough, people feel violated.

I don’t know what the balance is, and I don’t pretend to be a terrorism expert. And the new procedures have certain civil liberty concerns. But I will say that the new TSA procedures aren’t the outrage, to me. It’s in what Digby writes:

It’s not like the they haven’t shown that they are creative enough to do something other than blowing up an airplane to make their point. Look at the London and Madrid subway bombings or the Mumbai operation or that horrible Chechen school hostage taking.

Exactly. Terrorism goes far beyond the airports. The outrage is what is not being done to improve just-a-little-screening-but-not-too-much checks- or none at all.

Adam Bink :: The security theater isn’t at the airport

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So what you find to be the outrage… (4.00 / 1)
…is that we are not yet living in a complete security/police state? You’re outraged that citizens are not searched more often and more completely before attending any large scale public gathering, sporting event or place?

I really do not understand the attitude. It’s a fear-based reptile brain response and it’s utterly irrational. The ordinary dangers we face in our everyday lives are vastly out in front of terrorism in terms of threats to our well being.

You want more (and more thorough) searches? We part ways. I want to live in a free society, or as free as possible. I want to live in a nation where you need to be reasonably suspected of doing something wrong (read “probable cause”) before anyone in any position of authority can detain or search you. The things that the fear-based crowd are clamoring for are a vision of dystopia to me.

You don’t want to get hurt attending a concert? When was the last time there was an attack on a concert? Even if there were an attack on one, does that mean we should give into fear, overreact and expand the security state even further?

Don’t give into fear. Don’t be terrorized. You’re more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder.

If you are as afraid as you seem to be, my suggestion is to build a bunker…and stay there.


 
now – (0.00 / 0)
I liked that comment – A lot
And the ‘stat’ chance to get killed in a terrorist attack is soo crazyly low – that it takes a bunch of the most paranoid people – to even do these pat-downs in airport – And – Hey ‘girls’ – I know some countries where you don’t get patted down anywhere – (besides at some airports) – and they just do it – because it’s like ‘Dancing with the Stars’ – American entertainment has to be copied!

[ Parent ]  
and to ALL the 'peoples' in Chicago!! (0.00 / 0)
THIS IS A WARNING!
(especially if you are young and black!)
DON’T LEAVE THE HOUSE – “EVER”!!
(uuh – I forget for a second nobody who is young and black would read this stuff here!)

So – To ALL Americans out there – Don’t leave your house EVER!!
(stay on the Intertubes!)
 


[ Parent ]  
and Adam – darling – (0.00 / 0)
it really must have gotten to you – Spend a nice long vacation in Watts (very close to Lalaland!) – and snap out of it! (whatever you’re in!)

[ Parent ]  
and before I forget – (0.00 / 0)
Romberry – just a correction – In REAL police- states they don’t do pat-downs for entertainment reasons – They are REAL serious about it!
(you know what I mean Adam?)

[ Parent ]  
unreasonable search, anyone? (4.00 / 3)
There is an actual constitutional issue here, and these are the tactics of a police state. It is long past time to push back hard. Not only will I not succumb to these measures in order to fly, but I sure as heck will not put my eight-year-old daughter in the position of exposing her naked body to a “screener” (and exposing her small young body to the radiation of the backscatter devices) or having said screener touch her in places we have taught her are private. Private parts are private. You don’t have to show them to people or let people touch them if you say “no.” What kind of country/police state are we living in that I have to write a paragraph like this??!!

 
Absolutely spot-on. (4.00 / 2)
If it were just me, I could live with it (but shouldn’t have to–and as somebody who practices “constitutional law in the trenches” every day, battling unreasonable searches and seizures and governmental abuses, I can’t even believe I wrote that I could “live with it.”).  But, when my daughter and sons face this kind of sexually abusive, invasive, frightening, intimidating groping, I will draw the line (and did–when we were traveling this past weekend).  I will not have my children growing up in a perpetual state of fear, and of powerlessness against an abusive government.

Mr. Bink, I think I’m probably quite a bit older than you, and I still remember a time when we did not live in a police state.  I’ve also had the benefit of witnessing, in case after case, the government breaking the rules and trampling on my clients’ fundamental constitutional rights.  Consequently, I am aware that we must maintain “constant vigilance” to preclude the death of our civil liberties by a thousand cuts.  We must never forget that it is the government that works for us, and that it is the government which must answer to violations and abuses of our most basic civil, constitutional liberties.  There is a hidden agenda here, and that is to intimidate and cow the people–especially a new generation of young people–into accepting ever-increasing levels of governmental control over their lives, and abuse of their rights.  I will be damned if I allow my kids to meekly accept the advent of a police state.


[ Parent ]  




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS