Updated: Source of NC robocalls found

by: wanderindiana

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 13:10


Facing South reports:

Who's behind the mysterious "robo-calls" that have spread misleading voter information and sown confusion and frustration among North Carolina residents over the last week?

Facing South has confirmed the source of the calls, and the mastermind is Women's Voices Women Vote, a D.C.-based nonprofit which aims to boost voting among "unmarried women voters."

What's more, Facing South has learned that the firestorm Women's Voices has ignited in North Carolina isn't the group's first brush with controversy. Women's Voices' questionable tactics have spawned thousands of voter complaints in at least 11 states and brought harsh condemnation from some election officials for their secrecy, misleading nature and likely violations of election law.


Shocking to see who is on the board of this organization -- John Podesta and one Michael Lux, a founding partner of this site.

Would love to see some commentary on this from the top.

wanderindiana :: Updated: Source of NC robocalls found
Josh Marshall says:

Does that group doing voter-suppression calls in North Carolina have ties to the Clinton campaign?

The analysis done by Facing South seems to indicate the possibility.

UPDATE: This story is picking up steam, quickly, as evidenced by the story's crossposts at Daily Kos and MyDD, where judgment is flying fast and furiously.

UPDATE 2: Mike Lux's first response:

I have been working at home today, completely focused on a May 1 deadline, but was just made aware of the controversy regarding Women's Voices. Women Vote.  (Disclosure: I am on their board.) I called Page Gardner and have had a quick conversation with her as well as seen the statement that she released.  I am completely confident that this was an accident. As far as I can tell, I think it was more a consequence of trying to move on 24 states in a short amount of time, and having nothing to do with the upcoming primary.

I have known Page Gardner for 16 years.  She has dedicated her life to trying to get folks to register to vote, and would never do anything to deter anyone from voting.

I am still gathering facts, as to what happened and as to what the exact sequence of events was.  As soon as I know more details I will do another post on what I learn.

In the meantime, I think that it's entirely possible that busy folks were a little bit asleep at the switch in this situation, but I really don't think there was any bad intent here.

UPDATE 3: The WVWV mailer, or at least a scanned copy of one sent to a home in Oregon, is up for perusal at TPM Muckraker. I should also note their original post and its comment thread, which contains some damage control attempts by Sarah Johnson of WVWV. Read it and judge for yourself.

UPDATE 4: Facing South, where the story originated, says the NC Attorney General has called WVWV's calls "violated the law".

UPDATE 5: Matt Stoller adds some damage control to the mix; Facing South reports that MSHC Partners was responsible for WVWV's voter outreach:

At the same time, MSHC also does direct mail and outreach for the Hillary Clinton campaign. In fact, the campaign owes MSHC $807,000, according to Politico.com.

UPDATE 6: Kossack stefanielaine gets a response from John Podesta that sounds a lot like Mike Lux's:

Believe me, you were no more shocked than I was. WVWV has a strong record of registering disenfranchised people so that they can participate in the political process. Over 400,000 in this cycle. With respect to North Carolina, remedial action is being undertaken.  While  I believe the calling program there was a mistake of judgment and execution, and not an attempt to disenfranchise voters, as a board member, I have asked for a full accounting of the circumstances of the North Carolina events.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
shoulda read jakedecker's Um..... first (0.00 / 0)
I will try to keep an open mind here on what has happened, and would love to hear some rebuttal commentary from the principles of this outfit, but as it stands right now, it looks ugly.

Glad you posted (0.00 / 0)
Since jakedecker's post gave no clue from the title what it was about, and little clue even in the body, it wasn't likely to get much attention. Yours is much more effective.

[ Parent ]
Surprise, they had a press release armed and ready (4.00 / 3)
They claim that they are focussed on voter registration for the fall.  So why did they do this the week before the primary?  And use the same m.o. in other states?  And why does the robbocall not mention the organizations name?  This is  b.s. and disgusting.  And extremely shameful.

Exactly. (4.00 / 1)
I read the release (which is also posted at HuffPo, of all places) and the way it addresses the problems with the calls and the mailings is weak at best.

[ Parent ]
More Info, Group Claimed to Clean Up Act After VA Primary (4.00 / 2)
See, now we know this is b.s. for two reasons.

1. NC has automatic voter registration.  So why are  they doing this?  Are they that dumb?

2. After their shenanigans in VA, they said they would correct their 'mistakes', they did not.

http://hamptonroads.com/2008/0...


Extremely disconcerting (4.00 / 2)
The links to the Clinton campaign (Maggie Williams was on their board, for example, and Page Gardner is a huge Clinton supporter) point to a disgusting below-the-radar play at suppressing the African-American vote in North Carolina. Why on earth would a women's voting group use a robocaller named 'Lamont Williams'? It's total bullshit.

And yeah, Lux needs to come clean about his role in this firm.


Hoping Lux weighs in with a frontpager. (4.00 / 2)
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until I learn more.   Until then the blame would go to the day to day staff and strategists.

Lux might give us information that others might not get access to, and I hope he does.   Given his postings here, I seriously doubt he is "in" on this or agrees with the actions of the org.    If anything, this epidose would reinforce what he wrote about during his lean towards Obama away from HRC.

WVWV is either very very sloppy in their craft, their vendors failed them, or they really do suck and need to be publicly raked over.    By any measure, it is ugly.


Oops, invented a word there. (0.00 / 0)
s/epidose/episode/

[ Parent ]
yeah Mike, what's up? (0.00 / 0)
This looks really bad.

MENU

OpenLeft in your inbox!

 

Or, subscribe to each author individually.

PREMIUM AD

ADVERTISEMENTS



SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

OPENLEFT VIDEO WALL
Donna Edwards Thanks OpenLeft


Russ Feingold on the New FISA Legislation


Jon Conyers on Impeachment


Al Franken Thanks Blue Majority


FCC Commissioner Michael Copps on Pearl Jam, Net Neutrality


Darcy Burner on the FISA Legislation

More OpenLeft video...