EFCA Setbacks: A Familiar Story of Corporate Power vs. The Middle Class

by: Drum Major Institute

Thu Apr 23, 2009 at 10:27


By Amy Traub

The Employee Free Choice Act is key to rebuilding the American middle class – news of Senators wavering in their support for the bill revalidates a key truth about Congress: the main stumbling block to strengthening and expanding the middle class is corporate power.

The same pattern emerges every year on TheMiddleClass.org. Throughout the year, DMI uses the site to share analysis about the impact of Congressional legislation on Americans’ ability to gain – and hold onto – a middle-class standard of living. Once a year, we take a step back and look at the big picture. It often looks depressingly familiar: fiscal conservatives notwithstanding, Congress does fairly well when it comes to measures that simply involve spending more, but falls short – often far short – when powerful corporate interests clash with the wellbeing of the nation’s current and aspiring middle class.

In 2008, for example, Congress stood up for the middle-class on issues like providing more funds to higher education and passing a consumer safety bill that’s even been endorsed by the industry its regulating. Virtually all Democrats voted for these bills, and most Republicans as well. Similarly in 2007, college aid did well and majorities from both parties in the House voted for common sense contracting reforms.

But Congressional support for middle-class Americans falls off precipitously as soon as major corporate interests are at stake.

In 2007, the Peru trade bill was the skunk at the garden party, provoking 64 percent of Senate Democrats and 48 percent of House Democrats (along with nearly every Republican) to vote for multinational corporations and large investors at the expense of their middle-class constituents. Last year, it was a willingness to put banks before struggling homeowners, telecommunications companies before consumers, and those @%$& banks again before taxpayers. These weren’t the only policy disappointments of the year for middle-class Americans, but they were the main cases where significant numbers of Democrats joined nearly all Republicans in selling out the middle class.

This year, I fear Thomas Frank is right when he predicts the same fate for EFCA. Sure, Congress will approve health coverage for low-income kids (an important boost for aspiring middle-class families in its own right) but when it comes to standing up for middle-class Americans against a full-scale corporate lobbying campaign, Congress may not have the guts. That’s terrible news for the middle class.

Drum Major Institute :: EFCA Setbacks: A Familiar Story of Corporate Power vs. The Middle Class

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I have to say the response from the Labor movement is weak (4.00 / 4)
They have not confronted the “intimidation” issue head-on.  Their response has tended to dodge this issue.  The fact is that the issue is real: in an ideal world the secret ballot is the best, fairest way and card check is less protective.  

But we don’t live in an ideal world, and in practice, not having card-check and not having an effective and impartial NLRB means that the intimidation is coming entirely from the employers’ side, something the employers never want to talk about.  It’s understandable that the employers don’t want to talk about but when are the unions going to start talking about it?  Ads from unions need to focus on real workers who have gotten screwed by the present process.  

The namby-pamby campaign by Labor seems to want to shove all this nasty stuff under the rug in hopes of sneaking this through and that won’t get the job done.

Labor needs to fight for this, not beg for this.  

sTiVo’s rule: Just because YOU “wouldn’t put it past ’em” doesn’t prove that THEY did it.


 
Labor is its own worst spokesperson (4.00 / 1)
In December, I couldn’t believe how little the UAW was doing to counteract the BS common “wisdom” that GM’s failure was the unions’ fault.  They never, every adressed that issue head on, and just glanced over it…  So, it became the common “fact” that union wages and benefits caused the demise of the U.S. auto industry…

I’ve been trying to figure out why labor has such crappy messaging… I think part of it is that labor feels that they only need to work the inside, lobbying game, and not deal with the public directly.  

I think the bigger issue is that labor lives in a bubble.  They just assume that everyone in America is on their side… After all, why wouldn’t anyone be pro-union?   Anyone from a union family wouldn’t even think twice about questioning it… They don’t realize that with declining union numbers, the right has instituted class warfare against labor, and a significant number of Americans think labor is the enemy… even a large number of Democrats (according to some interesting poling that was charted by Nate Silver)…

Until labor markets itself effectively outside its normal sphere of influence, business will always have the upper hand…

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don’t alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]  
You may be right (0.00 / 0)
but geez, how CAN they think that everyone’s on their side?  After all this time of being pounded.  

I’m no longer part of the Labor movement but my roots are there and this is so painful to watch.

sTiVo’s rule: Just because YOU “wouldn’t put it past ’em” doesn’t prove that THEY did it.


[ Parent ]  
'Cos they live in places like Michigan (0.00 / 0)
When it’s just accepted that unions are good and must be preserved… It’s the same with the auto industry.  Around here, we are in shock that most of the country wants GM and Chrysler to go under… I mean, here it’s a given that manufacturing should be saved… We can’t understand why the rest of the country wants to do us in so vehemently.

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don’t alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]  
because labor as allowed itself become imeshed with (0.00 / 0)
the neocons, and people that obviously don’t believe in unions, and probably never did.  Read about Social Democrats USA, and the Shactmanites, and the National Endowment for Democracy.


My blog  

[ Parent ]  
This is why we (4.00 / 3)
must elect better Democrats.

There are two Democratic Parties: (1) the corporate, moderate pro-business and anti-worker Dems; and (2) progressive Dems who are allied with working people.

The first eventually will migrate to a reborn Republican Party after the reactionaries destroy themselves completely, or we will need to create a labor-based third party, a blue-green alliance.

The commmon front against Bush will soon collapse.    


 
Also, it's not (4.00 / 4)
a lack of guts. Many Democratic office holders are bought and paid for by camapign contributions and share an upper class ideology when it comes to working class issues.  

 
Well, DUH! (0.00 / 0)
the main stumbling block to strengthening and expanding the middle class is corporate power.

Has ANYONE with the cognitive competence of a sponge ever doubted that?

CorpoRat power was also the key to understanding the recent financial melt-down, too, as–beginning with Raygun–the Btate and the Bidness “community” conspired to hold down wages but simultaneously sustain the consumer economy by making credit easier to get and thereby effectively indenturing the working class to the banks and credit CorpotRats…

And I do not see any way, short of torching their various hq, homes, and country clubs, that that situation ios going to materially change in the next, oh, say, 1000 years…


 
I'll say it again (4.00 / 3)
Labor needs to get on the streets.  

For example, one million workers from all over the country (from Detroit in particular) should assemble at 85 Broad St. (Goldman Sachs headquarters) and then precede to completely shut down Wall Street on May 1. (A working day, incidentally though it shouldn’t be!)

The prospect of the DP losing labor’s support, and the muscle for campaigns at all levels for the midterm elections would get Obama’s attention.

If EFCA capitulation means anything, it should mean that the days of labor’s unconditional support of the DP should long since be over.


 
If they would fight for it themselves (4.00 / 2)
and not wait for the Democrats, maybe they’d find themselves with more influence in the Democratic party and therefore, not have to face the unappetizing choice of staying where they’re not appreciated or leaving and having nowhere else to go.

sTiVo’s rule: Just because YOU “wouldn’t put it past ’em” doesn’t prove that THEY did it.

[ Parent ]  
union revival (4.00 / 1)
These cycles are always slower than we like. But the direction is obvious to all who choose to look. The last election is the largest example yet, and WILL be followed by more progressive members being elected next time. The general populas recognizes their falling lifestyle almost universally, and won’t stand more political capulation to capital. Pols that continue to favor money over people will continue to decline in numbers and influence as this rape-public-can recession continues. And continue it will, due to no change in the financial industry personel or regulations. When we finally achieve majority representation of the voters over corporations we will be able to set a new “new deal” that allowes advancement of the majority through fair: taxes, wages, benifits, working conditions, immigration, health care, ink, air time, and all other areas of concern currently dominated by big money at people’s expense. We will also be able to instill the discipline on both our executive office and finance that are required to re-establish the true meaning of the U.S. as leader of the world and a nation of law, not men.  

Government by organized money is just as dangerous as government by organized mob….. FDR

 
I would like to think you are right. Latinos have shown (0.00 / 0)
that they can hit the streets by the millions.  Latin America having been the experimental beginnings of The Shock Doctrine have successfully fought their way back out from under the oligarchs in many countries.  Real developmental economics that preach sustainable agriculture are growing stronger.  There is still a great deal of push back from the coporatists.  The Peru “Free” Trade Act was a set back.  We must not let Colombia Free Trade happen.  As Tom sugguests, we need a third party made up of the real left and labor.

On the pessimistic side, this administration could prove even more fascist than the last.  They reek of elitism and snobbery.  They are not nice people.


[ Parent ]  




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS