Whose Door Does This Oil Spill Darken?

by: debcoop

Sat May 08, 2010 at 00:00


 
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

May 1, 2010

Editorial
Unanswered Questions on the Spill

"....it takes the administration more than a week to really get moving."

The NY Times thinks that President Obama has not responded aggressively enough to this spill. Let's be clear:

No way is this oil spill Barack Obama's fault.

The fault lies with the ideology and mores of the Republican party and its theory of government.

Their solution to this country's energy's future is to drill anywhere and everywhere.

In their theory of government, government has no right to control who, what, where and how the natural resources of this country or this planet are  exploited or not exploited. Resources that are needed  by us all and is needed to protect us all.  Like my friend Jim Gilliam said in a private email, government is supposed to regulate corporate behavior not just be their willing partner/follower. This is a lesson that we all need to keep in mind, including the president.

In their theory of government, government regulation is inherently evil or at least counterproductive. So under George Bush etal, the only regulation in the Gulf has been self regulation.

This oil spill is  the fault of Republican ideology.
 

debcoop :: Whose Door Does This Oil Spill Darken?
And the Times is wrong again, if BP lied to Barack Obama and misled him that is not his fault. The spill itself and even, at the moment, the  seemingly futile attempts  to stop the spill is the result of Republicans, down to using Halliburton's technology over another technology that is more successfully employed in Europe.

However their is something here that I think that is Barack Obama's burden and ultimately the Democratic party's burden. I think that most progressives bemoaned this, (especially  because  he  had seemed to learn the lesson of health care,) and then a  month ago,  Barack Obama embraced,  or he thought he cleverly "coopted",  Republican ideas for how to solve our energy future.  
He is wrong there on the merits.  And on the merits I think there is little disagreement.  It was supposed to be another clever way to disarm right wing arguments.  But it has boomeranged back into the President's face and the face of the Democratic party.

I think this is now the recurring riff of this presidency.  I hate to say it,  but it is political malpractice.  

Once again the president embraced Republican ideas to be/look bipartisan and open minded.  But being Republican ideas,  they have all the weaknesses of Republican ideas - just like with the health care bill being a system built on Republican ideas of the health care system -  a LOOSELY REGULATED PRIVATE SYSTEM.  

So now the president has endorsed offshore drilling, which he still had the opportunity to repudiate clearly yesterday...but he merely temporized with an appeal to a temporary moratorium until "safe" ways are found.  Are there any safe ways?  

If this takes even 90 days to cap,  that is 18 million gallons of oil filling the Gulf of Mexico - I can't do the math but does that fill the Gulf ---what is the visual of that from space???

Barack Obama is not just the President of the US, he is the head of the Democratic Party.  I hesitate to be just political, especially since this is potentially an ecological disater of vast proportions,  but a Gulf full of oil through the summer,.  A Gulf   that voters would have seen endlessly on their TV screens, would have been enough to beat the Republicans back with as well as  over the head with in the midterm elections.  They would have been crucified on their oil rigs.

But now is that possible? I don't think so.  The Democrats running in the midterms are now hobbled in their ability to trash the Republicans,  because they have to tiptoe around their own President's position.  He had handcuffed them, he has almost forced them to zip their mouths shut on the issue.  Indeed the inchoate anger will wrongly accrue to him  , and the only thing the Democrats running may have to do is either defend him or run away from him.  

He is redefining the positions of the Democratic party in ways that many of us progressives are unhappy with on the merits.  But in this case he is also losing the political benefits of being on the right side for all of us.


Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm calling bullshit (4.00 / 1)
And the Times is wrong again, if BP lied to Barack Obama and misled him that is not his fault.

That he trusted an oil company to tell the truth isn't a defense for his failed response, it is an indictment.

I agree with the political malpractice, but view that as the third disaster (after the explosion and the bungled response).


Obama himself is a liar. (0.00 / 0)
Don't try to paint a picture that only BP or some other right-wing bogey man are bad people.

When US-led Georgian forces murdered the people of South Ossetia, Obama laid blame at the South Ossetians' door step (for example). A non-liar would have pointed out what really was happening.

Under Obama, the Empire is largely intact and becoming more robotic every day.

Perhaps it was possible to "not know" about Obama before he took office (not really). 16 months into his term, that is no longer possible.


[ Parent ]
Once President Obama embraces Republican (4.00 / 2)
policies, for whatever reason, and makes them part of our legislation, they then become Democratic policies. The success or failure of those policies are then owned by the Democrats.  

We need liberal Democrats (4.00 / 6)
to take stands against Democratic-owned conservative policies.  We can't be tied down by meaningless partisan politics.  Liberals shouldn't be required to support the Democratic Party when it takes a headfirst dive into the shit lagoon.

[ Parent ]
Ergo, the only thing worth fighting for is Constitutional change (0.00 / 0)
all other pseudo-reforms of immigration, banking, health care, or "social issues" can only be Pyrrhic victories until we get a modern Constitution.

Just to provide a bit more context: there isn't a whole lot of time. The global population keeps on rising and the environment keeps getting destroyed. "Running out the clock" is not an option. We need risky, bold, aggressive, outside-the-box politics; and I think you'd agree that it is preferable if that came from the Left.

It's coming in any case.


[ Parent ]
Liberals should just run on their beliefs (4.00 / 1)
and if they end up slamming President Obama as collateral damage, so be it - he probably deserves it anyway.

what CAN BE bipartisan is ideology and social forces...and who the current crop of mainstream AND rightwing politicians serve the same on this issue (0.00 / 0)
yes, it is 30 years of reagan-bush-clinton-bush-obama that created the conditions that led to the oil spill AND led to the failure to aggressively address the spill after it happened (which should have been preplanned).

I don't know the full context of Obama's quote from April on how safe drilling is, but I do know what he did on healthcare, what he is doing on immigration, etc.  It's possible that it's necessary, but it isn't honest and it is contributing to the disasters that the republican-led and democrat-followed ideology(ies) put in place.


Have no fear (0.00 / 0)
enough "Progressives" will agree with the right wing idiots that this is the government's fault.

So the perception will grow.  

But this was caused by a private company's negligence (at best), as you rightly point out.


Yes, but what is the answer? (0.00 / 0)
I agree:

1) In contemporary America, we can only react to crises.

Governing so as to avoid problems is unthinkable. We will reap a harvest of woe until this is fixed.

2) Obama reinforces the idea that he and the Democratic Party are unprincipled lackeys of Wall Street.

Obama campaigned against off-shore drilling, gave it the green light when the real government told him to do so, and has now only temporarily back-tracked until the story leaves the front pages, and we can get back to business as usual.

Forget about what the Tea Party and the Average Joe and Jane America are going to do in November; are YOU going to vote for that?!?

I'm not.

PS We're still in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Cover (0.00 / 0)
Obama has been giving political cover to the drill baby drill crowd by furthering the myths of Safe Nuclear Power, Clean Coal, and Safe and Cleaning offshore drilling.

Obama owns this spill almost as much as he should own the Bank Bailout he voted and twisted arms for.


Seriously? (0.00 / 0)
As Paul Rosenberg points out (on this very blog!), Obama appointed an Interior secretary with deep ties to the oil industry. He was confirmed in January of 2009. The BP permit for the Deep Horizon well was approved 3 months later in April, with zero meaningful oversight.

Since then, 26 additional well permits have been handed out in exactly the same way, by the exact same Interior Secretary. As Rosenberg says, these permits were simply rubber stamped.

Now, you may argue that we can't expect the president to know all of the intricacies of deep sea drilling, and that it is true. But we cannot excuse him for appointing an Interior Secretary with the record that Ken Salazar has.  

And in case you think he just didn't know any better, just last month Obama approved a massive expansion of offshore drilling, which would have been done using the exact same regulatory process, by the exact same department-a process that could best be described as simply signing whatever drilling applications the oil corporations filled out, and then going back to sleep.

This is not some case of Obama making the passive and innocent mistake of not realizing that the Secretary of the Interior was in charge of regulating activity that result in a massive environmental catastrophe. No, this is worse. Obama actively planned to allow a huge expansion of this activity, and he either did not bother to look into the risks of such activity, or did look into it and saw nothing or didn't care.

None of these possibilities are acceptable or excusable. They are precisely the kind of thing that we would be (rightly) excoriating Bush/Cheney for, and yet here you are, on Open Left of all places, excusing this behavior.

This is exactly the kind of sycophantic drivel one would expect to find on the pages of the White House web site. I suggest you peddle your nonsense elsewhere; Politico seems like the good place.



USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
Donate to Open Left





QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search