Fighting For the Middle Class and Against Big Money Special Interests

by: Mike Lux

Tue Sep 28, 2010 at 18:00


This progressive populist message that I have been writing about in recent weeks that seriously moves the dial for Democrats in Stan Greenberg’s polling is being used by more and more candidates. Here’s three exciting examples:

1. A growing group of members of Congress are going to be on the Hill tomorrow afternoon at 1:00 PM EST doing a press conference to push a strong reform agenda on behalf of the middle class. They will be endorsing the 3-point platform- strong lobbying reform, public financing of elections, and overturning Citizens United- that MoveOn members overwhelmingly supported in their voting, that 506,832 have already endorsed with their signatures, that 14 groups have signed on to, and that 201 members of Congress and candidates have already signed up for. Confirmed speakers at the press conference include the head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Raul Grijalva, the head of the Populist Caucus Bruce Braley, Rep. Chris Murphy, Rep. Paul Hodes, Rep. Paul Tonko, and Rep. Keith Ellison, and more are adding their names as we get closer to the event.

2. Check out this ad from Joe Sestak, attacking all the big corporate money being dumped in his race, and the motives of those spending the money.

3. Finally, check out this great new ad from Tommy Sowers. This is my favorite ad in the campaign so far. It definitely smells of country populism.

The great thing about these ads is that they go directly to the heart of what is going on this campaign cycle: because of the Citizens United decision, and because they don’t like being challenged in any way by even modest reform measures like the Wall Street reform bill, Wall Street, Big Oil, the big health insurers, and the Chamber of Commerce have been on the rampage, dumping tens of millions of dollars like it was going out of style into these campaigns, trying to buy the elections. The only way Democrats have a chance is to stand tall and call them out, to fight directly against them and the economic sins that have destroyed this country’s economy.

Mike Lux :: Fighting For the Middle Class and Against Big Money Special Interests

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Fighting For the Middle Class and Against Big Money Special Interests" (4.00 / 5)
for instance, forcing people under the threat of IRS penalty to purchase an expensive and useless product from near-monopoly corporations?

 
Insurance (4.00 / 4)
Don’t forget that insurance companies can’t drop children from the coverage plans they don’t sell to children anymore.

[ Parent ]  
Yup. Compelling evidence that his lame HCR can't work. (4.00 / 1)
There won’t be any real change as long as people don’t have the choice to sign up for a plan that isn’t coming from the same failed insurance companies! Without the public option, there’s no force in the market that will force the insurers to come up with better offers. This lame “reform” is only pushing the insurers into new loopholes. Where’s the advantage for the people in that?

[ Parent ]  
Agree (4.00 / 9)
“The great thing about these ads is that they go directly to the heart of what is going on this campaign cycle.”

The problem is that we progressives saw good ads in the last election and  the goods weren’t delivered. And it’s not just because of an opposition. It’s because the agenda changed as soon as the people we voted for went into power.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m working, donating, and voting for Dem candidates in my state. Just saying that we’re tired of advertising promises that don’t pan out.  


 
The Prospect offered a number of things (4.00 / 2)
the WH could do unilaterally, which therefore would not depend on the Blue Dogs or Republicans graciously not using Senate procedure as a weapon.  (The lead article is here).

Stories about actions being taken now that would help later would help give credibility to claims about what they might do to help later.

Such action would have a greater impact on activists, who are paying more attention to the disconnect between rhetoric and reality.  Energized activists can help energize potential voters, to help narrow the enthusiasm gap.  

Obviously, it would be the right thing to do as well.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]  
Action (4.00 / 1)
If you haven’t seen it, here are some other things that Obama could do on his own:

http://www.ianwelsh.net/what-c…


[ Parent ]  
there is also the matter of a war in Afghanistan, (4.00 / 1)
costing this country something greater than 6 billion a month which Ian Welsh omits. When I last checked this policy is Obama’s and Obama’s alone. Not the blue dogs (boo), not the Repbulicans (boo), but owned and operated by Barack H. Obama, Inc.

[ Parent ]  
Yup. Good point. (0.00 / 0)
So, simply promising “change” isn’t good enough. The candidates who run on this message have also to show where and how they made a stand for such change. And only progressives, which actually supported better legislation, will manage to get through this test. Effing DINOs have no chance to run on this message, because their actions contradict their lying words. Hopefully, they voters will present them with a bill for selling out!  

[ Parent ]  
the tommy sowers ad… (0.00 / 0)
..is just plain wonderful.

It is too bad that more Democrats can’t get up enough guts to run ads like that.

I think that rifle shot at the end exactly captures the mood of the country right now.


 
And just think…that same corporate money… (4.00 / 3)
…was financing Obama and the Democrats just 24 months ago…they must feel betrayed.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. – FDR


 
What's your point? (0.00 / 0)
“Sympathy for the devil”, or what?

And pls, let’s remember that the 2008 campaign also saw an unprecedented amount of small donor contributions! Don’t make it look as if Obama was only financed by the big spenders. Hey, the WH treated big money quite nicely, their profits are soaring, after all, but what did the small money folks get for their donations? What at all???


[ Parent ]  
You answered your own question (4.00 / 1)
Hey, the WH treated big money quite nicely, their profits are soaring, after all, but what did the small money folks get for their donations? What at all???

I believe that FLGibsonJr was being somewhat sarcastic why he mentioned that the corporate donors were feeling betrayed.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Lots of lame sarcasm here recently. (0.00 / 0)
Folks, if you don’t know how to apply sarcasm in a way that’s obvious to the casual observer, at least flag it with a {snark} tag or something, will ya?

[ Parent ]  
I got it (0.00 / 0)
and it is anything but “lame”.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
You wouldn't have got it if it had come from a new commenter. (0.00 / 0)
REAL sarcasm has to be evident regardless if you know who wrote it or not. It’s done by deliberately exaggerating a point of view to the point where it obviously becomes ridiculous. Now, can you tell me where the case in point here is any different from an average centrist Dem shilling for the corporate interests?  

[ Parent ]  
I got it because I understand US political culture (4.00 / 2)
It is abundantly clear that no corporate sponsor of Obama or Democrats has any reason to “whine” or complain that their investment in his administration is not paying dividends.

That’s left for the “little people”.

“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
I've seen the same point… (0.00 / 0)
…comming from folks who were completely serious. The comment threads of the NYT are full of them (not to speak of the WSJ). So, sry for not getting that “abundantly clear” sarcasm.

[ Parent ]  
Consider the source(s) (0.00 / 0)
NYT and WSJ are corporate mouthpieces through which disinformation spews with regularity. The fact that reading them has muddied your perspective means that they have served their purposes.

You do understand that “main $tream media” is more than just a funny phrase, right?


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Uh, didn't I say that? (0.00 / 0)
Indeed, consider the source! That’s what I basically said two comments ago, and you disagreed. And, btw, it’s not as if we don’t have some commenters, too, who would make statements like Gibson did without being sarcastic at all…

[ Parent ]  
Exactly (0.00 / 0)
I disgreed then because you seemed to treat FLGibsonJr as I would a member of the M$M, i.e. as supportive of the right wing corporatist pseudotheocracy that runs this nation.

I disgree now because you give the NYT and WSJ as much credibility as you have. What makes those rags any more “serious” than FLGibsonJr?



“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
I don't know Gibson that well. (0.00 / 0)
Do you?  

[ Parent ]  
No (0.00 / 0)
So what? I don’t know you either.



“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
isn't English your second language? (4.00 / 1)
are you der kommissar of humour now?

[ Parent ]  
I know humour, Sir! (0.00 / 0)
Humour is a friend of mine. But this ain’t no humour!

[ Parent ]  
Not a language problem (0.00 / 0)
it has highlighted a cultural difference, I think.

I’m sure there are German jokes and satire that would be completely lost on us because we have not been immersed in that culture. Besides, satire does not have to be funny or humorous.  

“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
You are right on… (4.00 / 2)
…however I was thinking the Democratic politicians were feeling betrayed when the source of their money started going to the other party after having delivered for their corporate sponsors like they had.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. – FDR


[ Parent ]  
That seemed obvious to me (4.00 / 1)
I was surprised that anyone thought the “they” who must feel betrayed meant the corporate sponsors, rather than the Obamites who’ve been loyally serving their interests for almost two years now only to have them dump money into Rethuglican campaigns.

“A fantasy is not even a wish, much less an act.  There is no such thing as a culpable or shameful fantasy.”  —–Lady Sally McGee

[ Parent ]  
Gray….I thought the sarcasm… (4.00 / 1)
…was more than obvious.  Sorry you missed it.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. – FDR


[ Parent ]  
Maybe it's only me. (0.00 / 0)
Since, once again, I seem to be the only one who was confused about this. Damn.

[ Parent ]  
Take it as learning experience, my friend (0.00 / 0)


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
All this effing retard has to say is, (4.00 / 4)
we told you so.  Obama and the Dems can’t sit up there acting like Republicans and expect us to applaud or throw money or bother to vote.   Do I want those crazy Republicans in office?  Hell no.  Am I tired of being ignored, taken for granted, and criticized as a “whiner”?  You betcha!   They shall reap what they sow.    

 
Mike, that's all fine and well, but what about the WH? (4.00 / 2)
What is team Obama doing, or at least planning to do, to help the mebattered Dems? More phony speeches?

Inmho there can’t be any doubt it would have a positive impact if the administration would do something that shows it cares for average people. Heavy handed regulation of big money coporations, for instance. Making a stand against the obscene demands by “too big to fail” banks like JPM, for instance. Even better, anti trust proceeding to make those banks small enough to fail! Remember Standard Oil, or Ma Bell? Everybody knows “too big to fail” is a problem, so why doesn’t Obama do something to correct this?

Really, where are ANY executive changes that show the WH understands the sign of the times and is correcting its course? Let’s hope Obama will at least come up with a popular, convincing replacement for Summers, and not once again with one of those Wall Street buddies!


 
Fish rots from the head (4.00 / 1)
Why would you expect Obama to appoint any cabinet or administration member that does not practice his brand of neo-liberalism?


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Because of pure self-interest! (0.00 / 0)
If Obama wants to be reelected in 2012, the continuing criticism by the progressives will force him to make ammends. Since the criticism seems to increasingly hurt the WH, as evident in the abandunce of complains about “whining”, it can’t take much longer for them now to notice that “get over it” won’t stop this, and that they actually will have to offer something to the progressives. So, let’s keep the pressure up!

[ Parent ]  
I don't think that Obama sees the situation that way (0.00 / 0)
By 2012, he’ll be running against Palin, Santorum, or if the GOP is not completely batshit whacky – Mitt Romney.

I think he plans to use the fear of a nasty GOP-run government to scare the “left” into voting his way.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
His plans and the scare tactic already fail in this election… (0.00 / 0)
..and so I think he won’t try them again in 2012. The guy isn’t totally stupid, after all.

[ Parent ]  
Is Obama running this year? (0.00 / 0)
Where are the scare tactics? Most of what I hear is that the “left” is being irresponisible because some don’t fully appreciate how much he has already accomplished. Painting the GOPpers as objects of fear would come back to bite him in the ass next time he capitulates to their demands. Why negotiate with evil?

The Dems are set up to lose this cycle – punching the hippies is more about laying blame than it is about trying to win the election. If the Dems lose their majorities, all the better excuse for Obama’s future failures.

Oh, well, I may have overlooked the scare tactics he is borrowing from Rove and Cheney, wherein he is normalizing the radical mis-use of executive and war powers that Bush II pioneered.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Here is the scare tactic (0.00 / 0)
One closing remark that I want to make: It is inexcusable for any Democrat or progressive right now to stand on the sidelines in this midterm election. There may be complaints about us not having gotten certain things done, not fast enough, making certain legislative compromises. But right now, we’ve got a choice between a Republican Party that has moved to the right of George Bush and is looking to lock in the same policies that got us into these disasters in the first place, versus an administration that, with some admitted warts, has been the most successful administration in a generation in moving progressive agendas forward.>/blockquote>
Obama in the Roling Stone interview. See QH’s.


[ Parent ]  
Not very scary (0.00 / 0)
because it begs the question of why the President has consistently capitulated to the right while kicking sand on the left.

The “inexcusable” word is an attempt to innoculate himself against blame for the looming electoral loss. He’s not scaring folks like  me – he blaming us, in advance, for his failure.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Who are swing voters to believe? Democrats or their own lying eyes? (4.00 / 2)
The political climate is so poisoned against Democrats that swing voters are willing to side against them pretty much no matter what. All that matters to these voters is that the economy is bad, that it doesn’t seem to be improving, and that Democrats have complete control of Washington (and, in Cuomo’s case, that they run Albany, too). To these voters, the Republican Party’s sole function in this climate is as a protest vehicle. They don’t want to give Democrats any more power, so they’ll vote for Republicans.

–Steve Kornacki, Salon.com

Too clever by at least half, Obama, his policy team, his political team, Congress, and the party all let events overtake them.  


 
AKA: Two Party Tyranny (4.00 / 2)
To these voters, the Republican Party’s sole function in this climate is as a protest vehicle.

Just a few years ago, the Dem Party was the beneficiary of this kind of protest and so the shuttlecock continues to fly.


“It sounds wrong…
     …but its right.”


[ Parent ]  
Tommy Sowers… (0.00 / 0)
…final shot. Wow. He aims the rifle, pulls the trigger, boom, kickback to his shoulder…and without missing a beat the guy turns to the camera and says the closing line. Very, very impressive ad.

 
Probably a "Rifleman" fan in his youth. (0.00 / 0)
Reminds of the intro.

[ Parent ]  
He's not old enough to have seen the show when it aired…. (0.00 / 0)
Though maybe he watched reruns.  Sowers was born in March 1976; The Rifleman aired from September 30, 1958 to April 8, 1963.

“A fantasy is not even a wish, much less an act.  There is no such thing as a culpable or shameful fantasy.”  —–Lady Sally McGee

[ Parent ]  
I think it has more to do with his military background (4.00 / 1)
The guy graduated first in his class from the Special Forces Qualification Course, and led a Green Beret combat team in Iraq.  He has to be very proficient with small arms to have done those things.

“A fantasy is not even a wish, much less an act.  There is no such thing as a culpable or shameful fantasy.”  —–Lady Sally McGee

[ Parent ]  
I actually cringed at that part (4.00 / 1)
as well as at the Scott Brown-esque “this is my truck”.

It just seems gratuitous.  What does firing a gun have to do with bad trade agreements and corporate handouts?  What, is he going to shoot the corporate lobbyists? (Not that I’d be against that.)

Having a gun in the ad would make sense if the ad were about his support for gun rights.  It just seems out of place in this ad.


[ Parent ]  
Great messaging… (4.00 / 1)
Now if only there were a Party behind it.

 




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS