Extended unemployment benefits run out today. Senators call for 1-year extension

by: Paul Rosenberg

Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 13:30


Extended unemployment benefits are about to run out today.  If al Qaeda really wanted to hit America where it hurts, this is what they'd do.  But there's no need, since the GOP is poised to do it for them.

A letter from 29 senators to Harry Reid and Max Baucus, says, in part:

"We understand the fiscal concerns that arise when debating a continuation of unemployment insurance programs.  However, a broad spectrum of economists has stated that these benefits have a significant stimulative effect and a greater impact on gross domestic product than most other federal programs. In fact, the Economic Policy Institute has stated that an extension of federally funded extended benefits would increase gross domestic product by 0.7 percent and save or create the full-time equivalent of 723,000 jobs.  A U.S. Department of Labor report, commissioned during the Bush Administration, has found that unemployment  benefits during the most recent recession saved 1.6 million jobs per quarter, lowered the unemployment rate by 1.2 percentage points, and reduced the decline in gross domestic product by 18.3 percent.  Based on this information, now is not the time to end federally funded unemployment benefits.

Conservatives like to pretend that all this unemployment is due to a sudden wave of laziness among workers.  Or, alternatively, it's because marginal taxes on millionaires has created "uncertainty", though how that's supposed to affect job creation they never bother to spell out.  But the reality is quite simple: This is the worst recession since the Great Depression, and employment gains in recoveries after recessions have grown increasingly slow over time.

From the Real World Economics Review blog last week, "USA long-term unemployment: 5 graphs", here are two in particular.

First, just how bad this recession is in comparative terms, and how weak and delayed the recovery is:

Second, just how sharply long-term unemployment has spiked:




This is not a question of economic policy.  

This is a question of economic policy vs. pure sadism.

Paul Rosenberg :: Extended unemployment benefits run out today. Senators call for 1-year extension

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So aggravating (4.00 / 6)
Obama: We need to squeeze money from federal employees even though the amount saved is literally meaningless in relation to the size of the deficit/debt and even though purchasing power among middle class citizens is crucial to economic recovery.

GOPers: We have no money to extend UI to these lazy, shiftless workers who will get off their asses only on threat of the cane of starvation.

Obama and GOPers: For the sake of the economy and bi-partisanship we agree to 100s of billions of tax giveaways to gazillionaires even though they don't need it and giving it to them further explodes the deficit and does nothing to stimulate the economy.

T. Jacobsen: Fuck you both.

Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot ashes for trees? Hot air for a cool breeze? And cold comfort for change?


Isn't it about time for a stable system for the long term unemployed... (0.00 / 0)
...to keep them from starving? Like in other countries? In the US, Congress every year plays the same old play, "extension of the benefits". Isn't this becoming boring and tiresome, even for the effing lawmakers? Why not impelement some reasonable rules, once and for all, and be done with it???

. (0.00 / 0)
Because reasonable is a variable definition. For instance, conservatives' reasonable is 1 year while progressives' reasonable is "long term" which probably means forever.

[ Parent ]
Your ignorance is stunning (4.00 / 1)
Reasonable would be defined by the rate of unemployment. In other words, a concrete number. If the economy is doing better, then it would be reasonable  not to have unemployment insurance. There are a lot of objective ways to measure such issues other than what apparently your conservative imagination can come up with. I found the one above in about 2 minutes of researching the topic here:

http://docs.google.com/viewer?...

A least you accuse me again of communism for understanding how markets work, let me remind you that this approach, using the rate of unemployment is (a) already the system in place and (b) until recently was the system used to determine long term benefits without setting artificial limits that had nothing to do with the economy.

So, no, your attempt to create new zombie lie is false. the truth is that the real issue is not reasonable or objectivity. Its ideological belief that refuses to accept where the American economy is. That's why we get comments from folks like you that people don't want to work because once again that fits what you want to believe rather than economic reality.

I just had a great email exchange with a friend of mine about another friend who is a Tea Party type although she's Asian. He couldn't understand how that's possible. I said because people believe what they want to believe without regard to history, facts, analysis or anything else. Its ideological fundamentalism masquerading as reason.


[ Parent ]
That makes way too much sense, which is why it won't happen. (4.00 / 2)
This particular issue and the way it's not being handled is a good example of cowardice amongst the ruling elites with D's after their names. The R's don't have any problem with in-your-face class warfare, but the Dems don't want to appear like that, so Harry Reid et al just keep kicking the can down the road until they can find the gumption to just cut those poor people loose. While I'm heartened that a whopping 29 people signed the letter to Reid, I wonder how much of those sigs are just fig leafs for what they know is coming. Plausible deniability: It's not just for breakfast anymore.

The elites want their tax cuts, first and foremost, which is one of the reasons they're so contemptuous of the unemployed, since those benefits might be construed as an obstacle to their own tax cuts/subsidies.

The persistent recurrence of this "debate" and attendant kabuki has been something of a warning to people for a couple years now that they're going to simply cut the 99ers loose at some point. Only their fear of backlash has prevented it thus far, but at some point they'll make it happen. If not this year, then next, most likely.

Saner people might conclude that a more comprehensive UE system might actually incentivize sound economic policy... if you want to keep those roles down, then create jobs!

No small wonder then, any sort of accountability in DC is poo pooed in polite circles.

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so."  - Mark Twain


[ Parent ]
You will see the entirety of the GOP pre-election playbook (0.00 / 0)
in this one issue:

do they really throw down?

Or do they merely play chicken a hundred times?






USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS