Fed's bank bailouot topped $9 TRILLION in loans--made TARP "pocket change" says Bernie Sanders

by: Paul Rosenberg

Fri Dec 03, 2010 at 10:30


On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve finally released the data on trillions of dollars worth of secret low-interest loans it madeto banks and other institutions during the height of the financial crisis.  Three banks received a total of over $2 trillion each--roughly three times the amount of money authorized for the much more high-profile TARP program:

A total of 23 banks received more that $100 billion each (chart on the flip).

CNN:

The Federal Reserve made $9 trillion in overnight loans to major banks and Wall Street firms during the financial crisis, according to newly revealed data released Wednesday.

The loans were made through a special loan program set up by the Fed in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse in March 2008 to keep the nation's bond markets trading normally.

The amount of cash being pumped out to the financial giants was not previously disclosed. All the loans were backed by collateral and all were paid back with a very low interest rate to the Fed -- an annual rate of between 0.5% to 3.5%.

Still, the total amount was a surprise, even to some who had followed the Fed's rescue efforts closely.

"That's a real number, even for the Fed," said FusionIQ's Barry Ritholtz, author of the book "Bailout Nation." While the fact that the markets were in trouble was already well known, he said the amount of help they needed is still surprising.

"It makes it very clear this was a very serious, very unusual situation," he said.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent who had authored the provision of the financial reform law that required Wednesday's disclosure, called the data that was released incredible and jaw-dropping.

"The $700 billion Wall Street bailout turned out to be pocket change compared to trillions and trillions of dollars in near zero interest loans and other financial arrangements that the Federal Reserve doled out to every major financial institution," Sanders said.

He said that even if the Fed was right to make the loans to keep the economy from toppling into a depression, it should have made stronger demands that the banks help American consumers and small businesses.

"They may have repaid their loans, but that's not good enough," he said. "It's clear the demands the Fed made were not enough."

In fact, in a Huffington Post Op-Ed, Sanders went on to say:

Paul Rosenberg :: Fed's bank bailouot topped $9 TRILLION in loans--made TARP "pocket change" says Bernie Sanders
Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations including two European megabanks -- Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse - which were the largest beneficiaries of the Fed's purchase of mortgage-backed securities.

Deutsche Bank, a German lender, sold the Fed more than $290 billion worth of mortgage securities. Credit Suisse, a Swiss bank, sold the Fed more than $287 billion in mortgage bonds.

Has the Federal Reserve of the United States become the central bank of the world?

The Fed said that this bailout was necessary to prevent the world economy from going over a cliff. But three years after the start of the recession, millions of Americans remain unemployed and have lost their homes, life savings and ability to send their kids to college. Meanwhile, big banks and corporations have returned to making huge profits and paying their executives record-breaking compensation packages as if the financial crisis they started never happened.

What this disclosure tells us, among many other things, is that despite this huge taxpayer bailout, the Fed did not make the appropriate demands on these institutions necessary to rebuild our economy and protect the needs of ordinary Americans.

For example, at a time when big banks have nearly a trillion dollars in excess reserves parked at the Fed, the Fed did not require these institutions to increase lending to small and medium-sized businesses as a condition of the bailout.

At a time when large corporations are more profitable than ever, the Fed did not demand that corporations that received this backdoor bailout create jobs and expand the economy once they returned to profitability.

I intend to investigate whether these secret Fed loans, in some cases, turned out to be direct corporate welfare to big banks that used these loans not to reinvest in the economy but rather to lend back to the federal government at a higher rate of interest by purchasing Treasury Securities. Instead of using this money to reinvest in the productive economy, I suspect a large portion of these near-zero interest loans were used to buy Treasury Securities at a higher interest rate providing free money to some of the largest financial institutions in this country. That is something that we have got to closely examine.

At a time when Wall Street executives are now making more money than before the financial crisis, how many big banks that paid back TARP funds in 2009 to avoid limits on executive compensation received no-strings attached loans from the Federal Reserve?

In fact, the revelations that have come out so far are somewhat similar to the WikiLeaks State Department cables--most of what they show is not really new, it's more a detailed confirmation of what people already knew in broad outline, or else strongly suspected.  But it's also potentially a treasure trove of much more specific and much more damning information to come.

Sanders concluded:

We have begun to lift the veil of secrecy at one of most important agencies in our government. What we are seeing is the incredible power of a small number of people who have incredible conflicts of interest getting incredible help from the taxpayers of this country while ignoring the needs of the people.

This is the same sort of unaccountable elite we see throwing its weight around in Spain, derailing their justice system in the WikiLeaks cables.  Such behavior is utterly intolerable in any democracy worthy of the name.

This is only the beginning.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Glad to see all the attention on this issue (4.00 / 4)
Stoller has been writing some great stuff on the Fed (see my Quick Hit).  Also here.

For all the talk of the importance of independence, it would be nice to see some talk about ends.  The Fed is only independent from the citizenry - would anyone care to defend that knowing that it acts not independently of banks but on their behalf?

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


I fear even more that this might be the end (4.00 / 5)
Of the America you and I grew up in.

This is only the beginning.

The word that the arrest of Assange is emminent:Julian Assange Feels Noose Tightening As Law Enforcement Closes In

And the capitulation of Democratic politicians to enforce the criminalization of the US government is pretty ominous for truth and honesty.

I really don't feel confidant that the people have any viable option to reassert the rights we once had.  We seemed to have fallen into some Orwellian hallucenation with a half-life greater than a human life expectancy.  There really only seems to be two scenarios out.  One is unspeakable and the other would be the hope that the greed and gluttony of these plutocrats will implode, but the timeline for that would be in decades if not centuries and the cost of human lives from the failure of the economic system would probably be even greater than armed rebellion.  

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


Mafia rules (4.00 / 5)
The government as criminal enterprise. No, we're not surprised -- we've all been feeling the effects for decades. For me, the delicate public discussion of means and ends which we're subjected to whenever the topic of our politics comes up among Serious People has always been accompanied by the bitter laughter of ghosts -- the ghosts of victims past, present and future....

All governments lie, all governments keep secrets -- they have to to do their jobs. It throws a monkey-wrench into their good work on our behalf when we wash their dirty laundry in public. Fine, but what exactly IS their work, and on whose behalf is it done? If we knew the real answer to that question, would there be hundreds of bodies in $5,000 suits dangling from lamp posts in Washington and New York, or would we simply retreat to that place which Orwell so eloquently described, to wait until they've had their way with us?

I suppose we could ask Jesus how it's all going to turn out this time. God forbid we should ask history. Marx had something to say about how much good that preference will do us; so did Santayana. Glenn Beck doesn't read those guys, though, and neither do we.


I'm really interested in this part (4.00 / 1)
I really don't know if parts of the program served a useful purpose in a liquidity crisis. But I suspect Sanders is right that a lot of it was a scam:

Instead of using this money to reinvest in the productive economy, I suspect a large portion of these near-zero interest loans were used to buy Treasury Securities at a higher interest rate providing free money to some of the largest financial institutions in this country.

Furthermore, I'd guess the Fed knew that and was happy about it.  

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.


Well It Was DESIGNED To Be A Scam (4.00 / 8)
So I'd be shocked! shocked! if it weren't.

It would have been easy to put rules in place that would have prevented scamming.  They weren't even talked about. Ergo, it was designed to be a scam.  That's what these people do.  They design scams.  They designed the CDOs. They designed the sub-prime mortgages.  They designed the TARP bailouts. And they designed these loan programs.  Everything they design is either intended to be a scam, or to be scammed.  They are incapable of conceiving of anything else.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
If you remember (4.00 / 2)
The first thing Hank Paulsen demanded was that he would be excluded from any future prosecution. Now that had to tell you something way back when.

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
Huh? What? (0.00 / 0)
Obama makes surprise trip to Afghanistan - I'm sorry, what we talking about? I was distracted by the dynamism...very leadershipy.

The MSM has tagged Independents the party of swing-voting 'centrism.' If Democrats no longer represent your liberal values, show America there is still a Left by registering for another left-aligned party.

This was a George W. Bush financial horror - well, one of them (4.00 / 2)
Any GOPers or Baggies commenting on this revelation?  Thank God for Sanders.  It's interesting that the lion's share went to investment banks & 2 foreign banks.  No Conservative outrage over that?  

Did the Catfood Commission recommend an investment transaction tax?  LOL.


What's the point? (0.00 / 0)
I told you all this long ago and the point was that:

Only a broadly based (left and right) populist movement has any chance of forestalling the Death of Civilization that MUST RESULT from criminal rule.

You wasted two years on the Obama Hypothesis when you should have been reaching out to the powerless across America for solidarity and civil disobedience.

I guarantee you won't do squat in 2012 except how we need to elect Democrats to keep the other controlled party out.






USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS