What the U.S.-China Summit Is Really All About (Hint: It's Not About Preserving American Jobs)

by: David Sirota

Wed Jan 19, 2011 at 13:30


No, it isn’t about getting tough on trade and currency manipulation. And no, it isn’t about anything to do with human rights or the environment. As Bloomberg News suggests, it’s all about serving the multinational corporate class that underwrite America’s politicians:

Chief executive officers from Microsoft Corp. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. will be among the corporate leaders the Obama administration is bringing together today for a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao aimed at expanding U.S. business interests in China.

CEOs Steve Ballmer of Microsoft and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman will be joined by General Electric Co.’s Jeffrey Immelt, Jim McNerney of Boeing Co. and 10 other U.S. business leaders for the meeting, the administration announced.

Is there a similar meeting being set up by the White House between President Hu and, say, labor leaders? Do I even need to ask? Absolutely not, especially considering that “expanding U.S. business interests in China” is mediaspeak for “moving production facilities to China” – which, unto itself, is a fancier way of saying “outsourcing more American jobs abroad.”

David Sirota :: What the U.S.-China Summit Is Really All About (Hint: It’s Not About Preserving American Jobs)

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Need a phrase (4.00 / 3)
These are not “U.S. businesses.”  They are for the interests of top management and, to a lesser extent, big stockholders.  They are not for the interest of U.S. workers.  Overseas outsourcing says that loud and clear.  U.S. security?  Hardly, we the people fight wars and support a huge national defense system for these corporate persons.  They pay a lower and lower share of taxes and pollute the atmosphere and water while wrecking the education of our youngsters and the health of everyone.

U.S. based multinationals is a little long winded.  U.s. based robber barons is closer to it.  Not mellifluous enough though.


 
The Atlantic has an interesting article (4.00 / 2)
http://www.theatlantic.com/mag…

wherein they are called the ‘Global Elite’ or ‘the Plutonomy.’  Me, I just call them ‘The Big Money’, after John Dos Passos’ great book of the same name.  

The article is interesting because it shows that plutocrats of any nation feel closer to each other than to the masses in the countries they are ostensibly from.  I was always puzzled, reading European history, how the Spanish, English, Germans, and French plebes were always fighting each other, while at the same time, their royalty was busy marrying each other and extending the family ties to other ‘competing’ dynasties.  Looks like the same deal is going on here, some three to five centuries later.  Sure, the heads of Boeing are competing in one sense against the heads of Airbus, for one example, but really, they feel more gemutlichkeit towards each other than towards any of the little people.

Decarbonize, Deglobalize, Demilitarize


[ Parent ]  
Oh Goody (0.00 / 0)
I just noticed my CEO was amongst those present.  I feel so proud.

 




USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

STATE BLOGS