Senate forecast update: Even with Rossi's entry, Dems still in best position since early February

by: Chris Bowers

Mon May 24, 2010 at 18:30


Senate Forecast update, May 24th
  • Total Democratic seats: 52.08 (rounds to 52, down 6.92 from current)
  • Change from May 19: Democrats up 0.01 seats.
The past week has featured a lot of wild Senate news, meriting another update in the overall forecast.  From post-primary polling in Arkansas, Kentucky and Pennsylvania, to pre-primary polling in California and Nevada, to the Blumenthal scandal in Connecticut, and now to Dino Rossi's likely entry into the Washington Senate campaign against Patty Murray, quite a few things have changed.

Oddly enough, the changes appear to almost precisely cancel each other out, resulting in virtually no change from the May 19th update.  Democrats experienced marked improvement in California, Pennsylvania and Nevada, which offset their backslides in Washington and Kentucky.   Overall, the last time Democrats were in a better position than this was on February 11th.

Note that I am now projecting J.D. Hayworth as the winner of the Republican nomination in Arizona, despite John McCain holding a 11.7% lead over the last three polls of that primary.  The reason for this is that a lead of 11.7% is a pretty bad starting point for an incumbent, much less a former Republican presidential nominee.  With numbers like that, my gut tells me there is no way McCain survives the anti-incumbent and teabagger waves this year.

Thirteen campaigns, from Wisconsin through Kentucky in the chart below, are really and truly competitive right now.  If Democrats were to somehow sweep them all, they would actually gain a seat, and take 60 going into 2011.  If Republicans were to capture them all, they would take a 53-47 majority in the Senate.  This means both that control of the Senate is in play, and also that a huge amount will depend on the quality of individual campaigns from here on out.

Senate forecast overview, May 24th
Dems GOP
Not up for election 41 23
Incumbent party safe 6 10
Sub-total 47 33
Current polling 5.08 14.92
Projected total 52.08 47.92
Notes: Because they caucus with Senate Democrats, Independents Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are considered Democrats.  For now, Charlie Crist is considered more likely to caucus with Republicans, and as such is included in the GOP's overall total.

The 20 Senate seats that might switch partisan control
The chart below looks only at a broadly defined definition of "competitive" campaigns.  Campaigns where incumbent party currently leads by 18.5% or more are considered "safe" and not listed.
State Democrat Republican Margin Current Dem Win %
Wisconsin Feingold Wall* D 11.5 100%
Connecticut Blumenthal McMahon D 9.0 99%
CT Blumenthal Simmons D 17.0 100%
CT R Primary McMahon Even
California Boxer Campbell D 4.7 92%
CA Boxer Fiorina D 8.3 98%
CA Boxer DeVore D 8.7 98%
CA R Primary Campbell +6.0
Washington Murray Rossi* D 2.0 77%
Ohio Fisher Portman R 0.3 45%
Pennnsylvania Sestak Toomey R 1.2 32%
Colorado Bennet Norton R 2.0 23%
CO Romanoff Norton R 2.5 20%
CO Bennet Buck R 0.5 30%
CO Romanoff Buck R 1.0 33%
CO D Primary Bennet +10.5
CO R Primary Norton +11.0
Nevada Reid Lowden R 3.3 15%
NV Reid Tarkanian R 4.0 11%
NV Reid Angle R 5.5 6%
NV R Primary Lowden +6.0
North Carolina Marshall Burr R 4.5 9%
NC Cunningham Burr R 9.0 1%
NC D Primary Marshall +2.5
Arizona Glassman Hayworth R 4.7 8%
AZ Glassman McCain R 19.3 0%
AZ R Primary McCain +11.7
Illinois Giannoulis Kirk R 6.5 4%
Missouri Carnahan Blunt R 7.0 3%
Kentucky Conway Paul R 9.7 1%
Iowa Conlin* Grassley R 11.0 0%
New Hampshire Hodes* Ayotte* R 11.0 0%
Indiana Ellsworth Coats R 15.5 0%
Florida M 17.8 R 31.5 C 34.3 0%
Arkansas Halter Boozman R 20.0 0%
AR Lincoln Boozeman R 23.0 0%
AR D Primary Halter +2.0
Delaware Coons Castle* R 20.5 0%
North Dakota Potter Hoeven R 47.0 0%
Notes in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: Senate forecast update: Even with Rossi's entry, Dems still in best position since early February
Notes:
  1. The methodology can be found here.

  2. * = Faces primary challenge, but currently either clear favorite or no polling available.

  3. The following polls are used in the above averages are not listed in the various links to Pollster.com and Wikipedia.:
    • Arizona includes Research 2000 poll from early May.

    • Connecticut includes recent Blumenthal internal poll

    • Illinois includes early May poll from We Ask America.

    • Kentucky includes recent Research 200 poll

    • Nevada numbers include the recent PPP poll on Republican primary, and the FMMM poll for general election.

    • North Carolina includes May 5th Rasmussen poll.

    • Washington includes recent Washington University poll.
Please let me know how you think the forecast can be improved.  Suggestions are always welcome.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Any thoughts on Florida? (0.00 / 0)
Your forecast predicts that Crist will caucus with the Republicans, if elected. At this point, he won't say who he'll support. I think that if Crist is in the lead, you should count that seat for neither side.

until he says he will caucus with dems (4.00 / 1)
Then I am keeping him in the GOP column.

Would be stunned if he caucuses with neither. That means no committee asignments.


[ Parent ]
If we're predicting probability, though... (0.00 / 0)
Of course he's not going to caucus with neither. But right now your model predicts with 100% certainty that he will caucus with the Republicans. I don't believe it's a given, and if you do, I'd like to hear your reasoning.

If it's an uncertainty, shouldn't that be reflected in the forecast?


[ Parent ]
He'll caucus with whoever promises him the most (4.00 / 1)
Crist is the most self-serving politician on the planet, and that's saying a lot.  The man has no principles.

[ Parent ]
Right (4.00 / 1)
And it's likely the Dems will keep the majority, and they can therefore offer Crist more than the GOP. Putting FL at 0% is the type of subjective assumption Chris tries to avoid with these forecasts. FL should be at 50%.

DemConWatch

[ Parent ]
I think Crist (0.00 / 0)
may run for President in 2012 if he wins the Senate Seat.

If the economy doesn't recover, Obama is going to look increasingly weak.  With the GOP heading right, I think the right independent would have a shot.  I have long thought that if Perot hadn't been a nutbag he might have won in '92.  Crist is a lot saner than Perot, and is a complete opportunist.  

If in January of 2011 the economy looks like it is going to double dip, my guess is he may caucus with neither party to keep his options open.

As of right now Crist is squeezing out Meek for the Democratic vote.  I really wonder if that will last, but if it does Crist can win this seat.  His own personal popularity is still around 50%.


[ Parent ]
Norton could lose the CO-Sen primary (0.00 / 0)
in which case things would look a lot better for us there.

I have to believe PA-Sen is a tossup--I don't see a 2/3 chance of Toomey winning.

I see us with a much better than 4 percent chance of winning the Illinois race too.

We could easily end up with a net loss of only three or four seats.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


its a 4% chance to win if election were held tofay (4.00 / 1)
Not a 4% chance to win if election were held in November.

I only base forecasts on current polling, not future projections. I stand by my methofology. It rpovides an acurrate snapshot.


[ Parent ]
Also, why does Bennet still beat Romanoff so handily? (0.00 / 0)
If I read Chris's chart correctly it says that Bennet is still 10.5% ahead of Romanoff in CO-Sen Dem primary, but I thought I saw news that said Romanoff had just won 60% of the Delegation or something like that while Bennet had only gotten 30% and had actually gotten signatures together in case he didn't pass the minimum threshold for getting onto the ballot.

What's going on here?

Have there been any new polls?  I don't see them on RCP or here or the Denver Post, etc.


[ Parent ]
PPP had a poll our last week... (4.00 / 1)
...with Bennet absolutely crushing Romanoff...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Ah... I see. (0.00 / 0)
So what was all that about Romanoff winning so many more Delegates than Bennet?

Thanks for the info.


[ Parent ]
Ayotte (0.00 / 0)
Kelly Ayotte seems like a nice enough woman who is taking no positions.  Giving her an 11 point lead is accurate but Hodes should be able to easily slice into the lead.

Kentucky Is Changing Fast (4.00 / 4)
I realize this chart is a purely statistical exercise, but the reality in Kentucky today is a lot different than a polling average of all the pre-primary polls plus a single post-primary/pre-implosion/fist-on-the-scale Rasmussen poll would suggest.

I certainly like Conway's chances.


I have never seen so many incumbents (0.00 / 0)
below 50.  I thought 2006 was amazing, but this is well beyond that.

It is only a matter of time before we start hearing about a Democratic "firewall" to hold the Senate.  This would likely include Washington, California, Wisconsin and Connecticutt.

The Senate is very much in play, and Rossi is a pretty good get for the GOP in recruitment.    


How is Sharon Angle doing better than Sue Lowden in NV? (0.00 / 0)


Yeah but this seems like a mere fraction of the wingnuttery (0.00 / 0)
that Angle would bring to the table.

[ Parent ]

USER MENU


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you

Donate to Open Left





QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search